Sentences with phrase «review of the medical research»

Additionally, she provides an extensive review of medical research and many discussions with experts in the fields of nutrition, obstetrics, and anthropology.

Not exact matches

Sun Life will also conduct periodic reviews of the growing body of clinical research supporting the use of medical cannabis for other conditions, and update its criteria if necessary, the company said in a document updating their client base of 22,300 plan sponsors.

While research from the American Medical Association showed that 7.1 percent of all claims paid by insurers in 2013 contained a mistake, patient advocates and other professionals who review medical claims for accuracy put the frequency of billing errors at more like 80 percent or even 90 pMedical Association showed that 7.1 percent of all claims paid by insurers in 2013 contained a mistake, patient advocates and other professionals who review medical claims for accuracy put the frequency of billing errors at more like 80 percent or even 90 pmedical claims for accuracy put the frequency of billing errors at more like 80 percent or even 90 percent.

Board certified in Obstetrics and Gynecology and published in peer reviewed journals, Dr. Chin is the recipient of several research, patient satisfaction and teaching awards, and continues to be involved with the teaching of medical students and resident physicians.

Review of perinatal deaths and home births 1988 - 90 was assisted by a grant from the National Health and Medical Research Council.

A Brown Medical School teaching hospital, Women & Infants is involved in a variety of important research programs, all of which is reviewed by an internal committee that considers the rights and safety of participants.

Although the phraseology Ezzo uses to describe GFI's «survey» of more than 500 infants leaves an impression of rigorous medical research, no actual peer review process, as defined by the scientific community, was employed.

International research on safety of homebirths [1]: «In 2014, a comprehensive review in the Journal of Medical Ethics of 12 previously published studies encompassing 500,000 planned home births in low - risk women found that perinatal mortality rates for home births were triple that of hospital births.

In two separate peer - reviewed research studies, which were published in the medical journals Neurosurgery and Journal of Neurosurgery, respectively, the researchers found an 83 percent reduction in the number of torn fibers in a standard concussion model when the band was utilized.

After the loss of his daughter, Bill began an exhaustive review of the latest medical research and health recommendations for creating a safe sleep environment for babies and ensure other families would not have to experience their same tragedy.

He has served on the editorial boards of medical journals, has published over 90 peer - reviewed articles, and has received over $ 4.5 million in research funding.

A physician who allegedly conducted human brain - activity experiments on people associated with the NXIVM corporation has apparently not published a scientific study in years and there is no indication his private research was being overseen by an independent review board, according to a medical expert and records of the NIH and U.S. National Library of Medicine.

Research «crucial» Mr Cable's speech coincided with a report in the Times newspaper, suggesting that ahead of next month's comprehensive spending review, the Medical Research Council (MRC) is considering plans to withdraw the # 105m it spends every year on cancer.

Goswami agreed with an audience member that data scientists could learn from the field of medical ethics and the institutional review boards that oversee issues such as informed consent in clinical research.

Advocates of biomedical research, professional societies, and patient groups had mobilized to plead for a more careful review, warning that this bill's language was so vague it might hinder research on human stem cells and new medical therapies.

Postpartum psychosis almost always stems from bipolar disorder but is often missed because of its rarity and lack of research on the subject, according to the review from Northwestern Medicine, Stanford University and Erasmus Medical Center in the Netherlands.

In a 2006 review of 842 scientific papers on omega - 3 fatty acids and cardiovascular disease, a research team based at the TuftsNew England Medical Center in Boston concluded that only EPA and DHA seemed beneficial — ALA, their plant - produced precursor, was not.

Yet this is at odds with the latest research from allergy specialists, says Elissa Abrams of the University of Manitoba in Winnipeg, Canada, in a review published this week (Canadian Medical Association Journal, doi.org/8jg).

In a 2006 study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, the authors reviewed 1000 research articles from 10 high - ranking, international peer - review journals and found that up to 11 % of articles had authors who weren't named.

A Robert Wood Johnson Medical School rheumatologist and a clinical psychologist at the University of Michigan's Chronic Pain and Fatigue Research Center reviewed the impact back pain had on the life and death of the 35th president.

Some of Cetero's suspect research made its way unchallenged into the peer - reviewed scientific literature on which the medical community relies.

The statement is based on a review of existing scientific research published in peer - reviewed medical journals that documents a strong association between adverse experiences in childhood and teen years and a greater likelihood of developing risk factors such as obesity, high blood pressure and type 2 diabetes earlier than those not experiencing adverse experiences.

Ivins's name is sure to be mentioned at a public meeting being held today by a National Research Council panel that is reviewing safety issues relating to a proposed expansion of the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases in Frederick, Maryland, where Ivins worked for more than 3 decades.

«To support this goal and accelerate these efforts, changes in directions of research support and funding may be required,» co-authors Padmanee Sharma, M.D., Ph.D., professor of Genitourinary Medical Oncology and Immunology, and Jim Allison, Ph.D., chair of Immunology, said in the review.

«It's clear the review panel have got the message that there are things to be fixed,» Darren Saunders, cancer biologist at the Garvan Institute of Medical Research in Darlinghurst, Australia, told The Conversation.

But the review panel says that scientists should be careful not to make exaggerated claims about the medical impact of such research, and funding organizations should encourage more cooperation between basic and clinical researchers to make sure experimental results have maximum impact.

In response, the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), the Medical Research Council (MRC), the National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs), and the Wellcome Trust commissioned the new review, which asked all 72 researchers who had received funding for research with NHPs between 1997 and 2006 to answer a questionnaire about the outcomes of theResearch Council (BBSRC), the Medical Research Council (MRC), the National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs), and the Wellcome Trust commissioned the new review, which asked all 72 researchers who had received funding for research with NHPs between 1997 and 2006 to answer a questionnaire about the outcomes of theResearch Council (MRC), the National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs), and the Wellcome Trust commissioned the new review, which asked all 72 researchers who had received funding for research with NHPs between 1997 and 2006 to answer a questionnaire about the outcomes of theResearch (NC3Rs), and the Wellcome Trust commissioned the new review, which asked all 72 researchers who had received funding for research with NHPs between 1997 and 2006 to answer a questionnaire about the outcomes of theresearch with NHPs between 1997 and 2006 to answer a questionnaire about the outcomes of their work.

The research, Barriers and facilitators to public access defibrillation in out - of - hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review, was conducted by Warwick Medical School, the University of Warwick; the Institute of Digital Healthcare, WMG, the University of Warwick; Heart of England NHS Trust, Birmingham; London Ambulance Service NHS Trust and Imperial College Neurotrauma Centre, St Mary's Hospital, London.

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) Director Jeremy Berg notes in a comment submitted to the Scientific Management Review Board (SMRB) that he was the only board member to vote on 7 December against creating the new center because of the possible impact on the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR).

A major and wide - ranging government review of the future of Australian health and medical research reinforces Clark's position.

Bob Godt, a professor at the Medical College of Georgia in Augusta who also sits on NIH review panels, describes his grant - writing experience while doing research in Sweden.

Released by Health Minister Tanya Plibersek, Strategic Review of Health and Medical Research in Australia — Better Health Through Research, known as the McKeon Review, recommended strengthening the country's IP system and argued against outlawing patents on human genetic material.

This study was approved the by the University of California, San Diego Institutional Review Board (IRB Project 140072) and conformed to the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects (54).

«Our review represents the first comprehensive analysis of the effect of using surgical safety checklists on major postoperative complications,» said Brigid Gillespie, Ph.D., R.N., National Health & Medical Research Council and Griffith University, Queensland, Australia.

In a recent review, researchers from the French Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM), Atomic Energy Commission (CEA) and University of Paris - Diderot compared the effects of six potential EDs on the function of rat, mouse and human fetal testis at comparable stages of their development.

In a review published in the April issue of Immunity, Kevin J. Tracey, MD, president of The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, says it's time to take a fresh look at the medical community's approach to treating sepsis, which kills millions worldwide every year, including more than 200,000 AmeMedical Research, says it's time to take a fresh look at the medical community's approach to treating sepsis, which kills millions worldwide every year, including more than 200,000 Amemedical community's approach to treating sepsis, which kills millions worldwide every year, including more than 200,000 Americans.

The Trinity research group, led by Smurfit Professor of Medical Genetics, Professor Seamus Martin, has just published its findings in the peer - reviewed Cell Press journal, Cell Reports.

Acknowledgement: We thank the following individuals for their many suggestions on this project and their review of the manuscript: John Brundage, MD, MPH, Army Medical Surveillance Activity, US Army Center for Health Promotion, and Preventive Medicine; Carl Castro, PhD, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Washington, DC; and Charles C. Engel, MD, MPH, Walter Reed Army Medical Center and Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences, Bethesda, Md..

He was commissioned for several international advisory activities, including a research program site review at the National University of Ireland (commissioned by the Science Foundation of Ireland) and grant reviews for the Medical Research Council in the United Kingdom, the Agence Nationale de la Recherche in France, and the Wellcome Trust in the United research program site review at the National University of Ireland (commissioned by the Science Foundation of Ireland) and grant reviews for the Medical Research Council in the United Kingdom, the Agence Nationale de la Recherche in France, and the Wellcome Trust in the United Research Council in the United Kingdom, the Agence Nationale de la Recherche in France, and the Wellcome Trust in the United Kingdom.

10/7/16 - Micheala Aldred, PhD and her team at the Cleveland Clinic Genomic Medicine Institute (GMI) were awarded a Peer Reviewed Medical Research Program Discovery Award from the Department of Defense towards her research on Hereditary Hemorrhagic TelangiectasiResearch Program Discovery Award from the Department of Defense towards her research on Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasiresearch on Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia (HHT).

They reviewed every issue of six top - tier international journals (JAMA, Lancet, the New England Journal of Medicine, Cell, Nature and Science), and four mid-ranking journals (British Medical Journal, JAMA Internal Medicine, Journal of Cell Science, FASEB Journal), chosen to represent the clinical and basic science aspects of research.

In his latest deception - published on 7 March 2015 - Olmsted directly tricks his readers, suggesting that the father of one of the children in Wakefield's research had attacked my peer - reviewed January 2011 series in the British Medical Journal.

The National Committee for Human Medical Research reviews and approves applications of all genetic research projects inResearch reviews and approves applications of all genetic research projects inresearch projects in Israel.

This study, based on existing medical surveillance data, was conducted under a protocol approved by the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research Human Use Review Committee that deemed it exempt from informed consent.17 Analyses using SAS version 9.1 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, North Carolina) were conducted.

In a substudy, review outcomes were also compared across different types of clinical research, based in large part on the designations and definitions derived from a number of sources, including a report by Nathan, 14 the Institute of Medicine, 20 the NIH Director's Panel on Clinical Research, 9 the Association of American Medical Colleges and American Medical Association, 21 and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.22 All 3599 R01 applications involving human subjects that were submitted to NIH for the October 2002 council were categorized into 1 of the following: (1) patient - oriented studies of mechanisms of human disease (bench to bedside); (2) clinical trials and other clinical interventions; (3) patient - oriented research focusing on development of new technologies; (4) epidemiological studies; (5) behavioral studies (including studies of normal human behavior); (6) health services research; and (7) use of deidentified humanresearch, based in large part on the designations and definitions derived from a number of sources, including a report by Nathan, 14 the Institute of Medicine, 20 the NIH Director's Panel on Clinical Research, 9 the Association of American Medical Colleges and American Medical Association, 21 and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.22 All 3599 R01 applications involving human subjects that were submitted to NIH for the October 2002 council were categorized into 1 of the following: (1) patient - oriented studies of mechanisms of human disease (bench to bedside); (2) clinical trials and other clinical interventions; (3) patient - oriented research focusing on development of new technologies; (4) epidemiological studies; (5) behavioral studies (including studies of normal human behavior); (6) health services research; and (7) use of deidentified humanResearch, 9 the Association of American Medical Colleges and American Medical Association, 21 and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.22 All 3599 R01 applications involving human subjects that were submitted to NIH for the October 2002 council were categorized into 1 of the following: (1) patient - oriented studies of mechanisms of human disease (bench to bedside); (2) clinical trials and other clinical interventions; (3) patient - oriented research focusing on development of new technologies; (4) epidemiological studies; (5) behavioral studies (including studies of normal human behavior); (6) health services research; and (7) use of deidentified humanResearch and Quality.22 All 3599 R01 applications involving human subjects that were submitted to NIH for the October 2002 council were categorized into 1 of the following: (1) patient - oriented studies of mechanisms of human disease (bench to bedside); (2) clinical trials and other clinical interventions; (3) patient - oriented research focusing on development of new technologies; (4) epidemiological studies; (5) behavioral studies (including studies of normal human behavior); (6) health services research; and (7) use of deidentified humanresearch focusing on development of new technologies; (4) epidemiological studies; (5) behavioral studies (including studies of normal human behavior); (6) health services research; and (7) use of deidentified humanresearch; and (7) use of deidentified human tissue.

As you may know, the lion's share of medical research funding in the U.S.A. comes from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), which is a government organization that reviews grant applications from scientists around the country and around the world and provides research funding for the best of those projects.

Researchers from the University of York, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, South African Medical Research Council and Stellenbosch University carried out a Cochrane review to assess the impact and effectiveness of school - based interventions.

Online ratings that review physicians — just like ratings for restaurants, movies and mechanics — can influence what doctor a patient chooses, but most patients rank insurance acceptance and convenience as more important factors, according to U-M research published Feb. 18 in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

What the research shows: A new review in The Journal of the American Medical Association showed that compared with a placebo, people who took Qsymia lost up to 9.3 percent of their body weight in a year; those on Belviq lost on average about 3.2 percent over placebo, while folks on Xenical lost slightly less than that.

Supported by grants from the American Diabetes Association, the Minnesota Beef Council, and the Colorado and Nebraska Beef Councils and by Merit Review Funds from the Medical Research Service, Department of Veterans Affairs, Minneapolis.