After a thorough
review of the study results including possible consequences and opportunities, it was agreed upon by the three cooperatives to continue working toward a change in the regulatory structure.
Not exact matches
A
study in the Harvard Business
Review indicated that these approaches may inadvertently reinforce biases,
resulting in the need for further and more sophisticated types
of analyses.
Following are a sample
of studies published in peer -
reviewed journals showing that as a
result of participating in MOC activities, physicians have:
Actual
results and the timing
of events could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward - looking statements due to these risks and uncertainties as well as other factors, which include, without limitation: the uncertain timing
of, and risks relating to, the executive search process; risks related to the potential failure
of eptinezumab to demonstrate safety and efficacy in clinical testing; Alder's ability to conduct clinical trials and
studies of eptinezumab sufficient to achieve a positive completion; the availability
of data at the expected times; the clinical, therapeutic and commercial value
of eptinezumab; risks and uncertainties related to regulatory application,
review and approval processes and Alder's compliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements; risks and uncertainties relating to the manufacture
of eptinezumab; Alder's ability to obtain and protect intellectual property rights, and operate without infringing on the intellectual property rights
of others; the uncertain timing and level
of expenses associated with Alder's development and commercialization activities; the sufficiency
of Alder's capital and other resources; market competition; changes in economic and business conditions; and other factors discussed under the caption «Risk Factors» in Alder's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on February 26, 2018, and is available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.
In 2008, Noam Wasserman published an article in the Harvard Business
Review discussing the
results of a recent
study he had conducted on entrepreneurship.
As a
result, I revised Article 4.1 to cite instead a
review by Vanguard using a Morningstar
study for the differences between individual investor returns and the returns
of the funds themselves.
The truth in many peer -
reviewed and stoichmetrically valid research
studies show positive and healthy outcomes as a
result of prayer.
Regulatory bodies have determined safety levels for humans, but those safety levels are currently being questioned or are under
review as a
result of new scientific
studies.
The systemic
review of six previous
studies combined the
results of 255 people with type 2 diabetes to see whether meat free or vegan diets improved blood glucose control.
â $ cents
Results from the
studies reviewed suggest that some patients exhibit symptoms at much lower doses
of gluten than others.
Resources Futures, a research think tank, undertook a broad literature
review in 2010 and identified 37 relevant
studies, only 14
of which use methods likely to generate credible
results.
We conducted a systematic
review of studies examining the association
of industry sponsorship with the statistical significance
of results, effect sizes, and conclusions
of nutrition research.
The present
review evaluates the evidence for such a complex system by investigating
studies in which interventions such as elevated temperature, altered oxygen content
of the air, reduced fuel availability and misinformation about distance covered have
resulted in alterations to the pacing strategy.
Two 2003
studies suggest that heading in soccer may
result in weaker mental performance, including a decline in cognitive function, difficulty in verbal learning, planning and maintaining attention and reduced information processing speed, but a critical
review of the literature in 2010 by an expert panel
of the American Academy
of Pediatrics found no support for such a finding, and a 2012
study in the journal Neurosurgery concluded that it was «unlikely» that the subtle cognitive differences detected were sufficient to affect the daily lives
of players.
The
results of a Cochrane
review will be presented, along with a discussion
of what was learned about such
studies in the process.
Even though I am not a researcher or medical professional and the peer -
reviewed study is to appear in the American Journal
of Obstetrics & Gynecology, I thought the
results were a scare tactic.
Sleep experts
reviewed 52
studies of various behavioral treatments that address bedtime problems and night wakings among infants and toddlers; 49
of the
studies showed positive
results.
Park District officials received the
results of a storm - water retention
study Thursday and passed the
study on to city staff for
review.
I think that if you look at the Cochran
Review, which did a meta - analysis
of studies of home birth, they actually rejected those
studies because they skew the
results of the analysis by including those unplanned home births.
Analysis Confirms Rice Poses Higher Risk for IQ Loss from Arsenic Exposure than Alterative Grains We recently released the
results of one
of our case
studies supporting this effort, a robust analysis grounded in peer
reviewed science, which examines the impacts on children's IQ from eating arsenic contaminated rice based foods.
The
study reviewed the births
of nearly 17,000 women and found that, among low - risk women, planned home births
result in low rates
of birth interventions without an increase in adverse outcomes for mothers and newborns.
In order to protect infant safety and ensure the patient and human rights
of mothers and babies, we have built a non-profit organization committed to: (1) the
study of exclusive breastfeeding complications that can
result in brain injury and, in the most severe instances, death; and (2) raising public awareness to signs
of infant hunger and the consequences that can
result based on peer -
reviewed research.
Two
review authors independently assessed for inclusion all the potential
studies identified as a
result of the search strategy.
In future updates
of this
review, if appropriate, for our primary outcomes, we will temporarily remove
studies at high or unclear risk
of bias (using the allocation concealment domain) to examine whether this has an impact on
results.
Two
review authors (H Whitford and T Dowswell) independently assessed for inclusion all the potential
studies we identified as a
result of the search strategy.
Evidence Basis for the Ten Steps
of Mother - Friendly Care in the Journal
of Perinatal Education, 2007, Issue 16, a Special Supplement The
result of a 2 - year research project by a team
of maternity care experts, this important work
reviews 15 years worth
of scientific
studies which and found that the evidence supports complying with each aspect
of the ten steps
of Mother - Friendly Care.
There was no strong evidence
of reporting bias, though this is difficult to detect with the number
of studies in this
review, and whether it exists and the extent to which it affects the
results may be clarified when more
studies have been conducted.
In today's peer -
reviewed Journal
of Midwifery & Women's Health (JMWH), a landmark
study confirms that among low - risk women, planned home births
result in low rates
of interventions without an increase in adverse outcomes for mothers and babies.
Since Dewey's
review was published, two additional
studies have been published with somewhat inconsistent
results, 11,12 although both
studies lacked a clear definition
of exclusive breastfeeding.
Four
of the 6
studies found no relationship between diphtheria - tetanus - pertussis vaccination and subsequent SIDS, 316, — , 319 and
results of the other 2
studies suggested a temporal relationship but only in specific subgroup analysis.320, 321 In 2003, the Institute
of Medicine
of the National Academy
of Sciences
reviewed available data and concluded that «[t] he evidence favors rejection
of a causal relationship between exposure to multiple vaccinations and SIDS.»
Our thought is that, because
of a
result of nondifferential misclassification, which, as we stated earlier, is inherent in many
of the
studies reviewed, the actual effect
of breastfeeding is higher than the one estimated here.
It's not clear why the
study and
results were not submitted to a peer -
reviewed journal
of experts where toxicologists and other professionals could
review the data, the findings and the context for the conclusions.
Two
review authors independently assessed all the potential
studies identified as a
result of the search strategy for inclusion.
There is therefore no strong evidence
of reporting bias, though this is difficult to detect with the number
of studies in this
review, and whether it exists and the extent to which it affects the
results may be clarified when more
studies have been conducted.
A peer -
reviewed study led by Duke University researchers found a measurable reduction in the suicide rate in Connecticut as a
result of a law enacted in 1999 permitting police to seek protective orders and temporarily remove guns.
Those recommendations included the creation
of a peer
review panel
of labor economists to
review the
study's
results and allowing IDA board members to vote on whether to adopt the
study's recommendations.
«Before we can say anything about the effect
of vitamin B12 supplementation in pregnancy, more
of these kinds
of studies need to be done, and the
results should then be summarized in a
review article.
With this kind
of review process, if 20
studies of the effectiveness
of a truly ineffective drug are conducted, and one
of them shows a significant effect with a p - value
of 0.05 because
of chance alone, investigators for the other 19
studies not showing any effect would presumably not be inhibited from writing up and submitting reports
of these for publication out
of fear that they'll be denied publication because
of their nonsignificant
results.
BN: At least five psychology journals are inviting people to submit plans for replicating specific
studies, which will then get peer -
reviewed on the basis
of their designs [rather than their
results].
That may change, thanks to the
results of three
studies presented here last week at the Fifth International Congress on Peer
Review and Biomedical Publication, organized by the Journal
of the American Medical Association and the British Medical Journal (BMJ) Publishing Group.
The new rules are «a tremendous step forward,» says Ebright, who says the obligation for prior
review of research proposals is «critically important» and should prevent cases such as the two H5N1
studies, whose potential biosecurity and biosafety implications were raised only on the eve
of publication
of their
results.
Preliminary
results of the
study were presented at a World Health Organization (WHO) evidence
review group meeting, while UNITAID has issued a call for further research into the use
of endectocide class drugs,
of which ivermectin is currently the only one registered for human use, as new vector control tools in the fight against malaria and other mosquito borne disease.
(Although the analysis has not been peer
reviewed, it builds on a methodology and includes
results from a peer -
reviewed 2014
study of forest carbon in indigenous territories in the Amazon.)
In an accompanying editorial, Elliott Bennett - Guerrero, M.D.,
of the Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, N.C., comments on the
results of the systematic
review performed by the authors
of this
study.
Efforts to change the consent process can lead to better
results, a
review of 44
studies finds.
That's when a women's health
study, stopped early after a data
review, published
results linking a common hormone therapy to an increased risk
of breast cancer, heart disease, stroke and blood clots.
The
study's
results suggest consumers who have a high level
of trust in other people distinguish between these two types
of errors in online
reviews.
Published in Physical
Review Letters, the
study «provides the most precise estimate
of the mass
of the Higgs boson yet known and is the
result of collaboration between two teams that operate detectors at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN, Europe's particle physics lab near Geneva, Switzerland.»
Such changes, Li and colleagues suggested while
reviewing a number
of related
studies, are consistent with anatomical changes that can occur in the brain as a
result of learning a second language, no matter the age
of the learner, as they reported in a recent issue
of Cortex.
«Our
review of the literature showed several positive trial
results, but we also found important research limitations in the
studies, indicating a need for higher quality, more definitive trials on antidepressant use for postsurgical pain.»