Sentences with phrase «review program performance»

Not exact matches

The managers were then grouped into small task forces around these goals where they worked directly with an executive to create solutions to these problems, which ranged from HR initiatives (resulting in things like new performance review methods and a new attendance system) to customer - level projects (such as a customer referral program).

Independent software review organization AV-Test.org awarded the program perfect scores across the board on factors including protection, performance and usability, and those scores alone suggest the user could do far worst than choosing the Bitdefender option.

monitoring workforce management programs; establishing compensation policies and practices for service on the Board and its committees, including annually reviewing the appropriate level of director compensation and recommending to the Board any changes to that compensation; developing stock ownership guidelines for directors and executive officers and monitoring compliance with such guidelines; and annually evaluating its performance and its charter.

based in part on their business line performance, and thus presented the potential for excessive risk taking, the HRC concluded that the emphasis on overall Company performance in compensation decisions, the existence of robust compliance, internal control, disclosure review and reporting programs and clawback policies, the Code of Ethics prohibition on, and right to discipline employees for manipulating business goals for compensation purposes and its prohibitions on derivative and hedging transactions in Company common stock, and the Company's stock ownership guidelines provided adequate safeguards that would either prevent or discourage excessive risk taking.

Andre Cohen will speak to our North America business product performance and review our key programs for the holiday season.

Other specific duties and responsibilities of the HR and Compensation Committee include reviewing senior management selection and overseeing succession planning, including reviewing the leadership development process; reviewing and approving objectives relevant to executive officer compensation and evaluating performance and determining the compensation of executive officers in accordance with those objectives; approving severance arrangements and other applicable agreements for executive officers; overseeing HP's equity and incentive compensation plans; overseeing non-equity-based benefit plans and approving any changes to such plans involving a material financial commitment by HP; monitoring workforce management programs; establishing compensation policies and practices for service on the Board and its committees, including annually reviewing the appropriate level of director compensation and recommending to the Board any changes to that compensation; developing stock ownership guidelines for directors and executive officers and monitoring compliance with such guidelines; and annually evaluating its performance and its charter.

To measure performance on the franchise side, HuHot utilizes tools such as secret shopper programs, online feedback, social media and operational reviews.

For a more detailed review of the school's academic performance, as measured by the CAASPP program, check back soon for the most current information.

No job description for the job of parenting: Is there any job which has no job description, no training program, no performance review and no orientation program.

Last week, the New York State Assembly Higher Education committee held a public hearing to review the performance of the new Excelsior Scholarship program.

There will also be a review of CD Program Performance, as required by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

Following a review of the available evidence and a public discussion involving the program's faculty, staff, and trainees, the exam's ability to predict student performance seems «weak at best» while it significantly disadvantages women, minorities, and students from low socioeconomic backgrounds, writes Scott Barolo, director of the Program in Biomedical Sciences (PIBS), in the announprogram's faculty, staff, and trainees, the exam's ability to predict student performance seems «weak at best» while it significantly disadvantages women, minorities, and students from low socioeconomic backgrounds, writes Scott Barolo, director of the Program in Biomedical Sciences (PIBS), in the announProgram in Biomedical Sciences (PIBS), in the announcement.

«There are no other cognitive training programs, or «brain games», that have been demonstrated by published, peer - reviewed studies to enhance driving performance,» says Jerri Edwards of the University of South Florida in Tampa, a co-leader of the study.

The head of the review team, John Casani, summarized the findings in a letter to NASA Administrator Charlie Bolden, faulting the project's «budgeting and program management, not technical performance.»

In general, this review of the published evidence suggest that school - based yoga programs may be helpful in reducing student and teacher stress and increasing mood, health, performance and pro-social behavior.

The What Works Clearinghouse, part of the federal government's Institute of Education Sciences, released in September 2006 its review of 55 studies of character education programs, which looked at «student outcomes related to positive character development, prosocial behavior, and academic performance.»

But as the frequency, duration, and failure rate of these exams grew with the implementation of federal programs such as Race to the Top and new teacher - performance reviews...

After a 1995 review of evidence on the performance of federal employment and training programs, the General Accounting Office concluded that «most federal agencies do not know if their programs are working.»

The program will link teacher pay raises and performance reviews directly to student achievement, and even allows a teacher with chronically low - performing students to be fired.

In programs in which fewer than 20 students are subject to the criteria in subparagraph (ii) of this paragraph, the commissioner may review prior years» performance of the program in order to make a determination whether the program shall be considered farthest from meeting the criteria.

Section 641A (a)(1) directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services to review and revise, as necessary, Head Start program performance standards including those standards related to health, parent involvement, nutritional and social services, transition activities and other services.

The commissioner may also place under registration review any school for which a district fails to provide in a timely manner the student performance data required by the commissioner to conduct the annual assessment of the school's performance or any school in which excessive percentages of students fail to fully participate in the State assessment program.

Progressive Discipline and Due Process This program will review critical steps needed to address employee performance issues, ranging from ineffective instruction to insubordination.

The commissioner may also place under high school equivalency program review any program for which a district or board of cooperative educational services fails to provide in a timely manner the student's performance data required by the commissioner to conduct the annual assessment of the high school equivalency program.

A student whose speech impairment adversely affects the student's educational performance shall be referred to the committee on special education for further evaluation and review of the need for special services and programs, pursuant to article 89 of the Education Law.

The state uses its program - approval and - review process to identify low - performing teacher - preparation programs, but it does not hold such programs accountable for the classroom performance of their graduates.

An article on the Philadelphia schools» teacher - accountability program in the Oct. 30 issue of Education Week incorrectly reported the results of Superintendent David W. Hornbeck's performance review.

The programs use multiple methods, including surveys of students, graduates, and employers, external reviews, focus groups and the examination of data, such as pass rates on tests, college GPA, and evaluation on various performance rubrics.

A 2017 multi-state review of voucher programs by Carnoy with the Economic Policy Institute found that students in voucher programs scored significantly lower than traditional public school students on reading and math tests and found no significant effect of vouchers leading to improved public school performance.

Conduct multiple evaluations for each first - year teacher that are integrated with the district's beginning teacher support program and include observations and reviews of student performance data.

9 «Performance — Race to the Top Technical Review,» U.S. Department of Education, March 2013, accessed June 10, 2013, http://www2.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop-assessment/performance.html; Race to the Top Assessment Program: Technical Review Process (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, April 2013), accessed June 10, 2013, http://www2.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop-assessment/technical-review-process.pdf.

The Commissioner of Education shall determine the continued approval of programs implemented under this paragraph, based upon the department's review of performance data.

The Commission of Higher Education is working to: 1) improve the quality of teacher preparation and performance; 2) open the level of dialogue among superintendents and principals and higher education teacher preparation programs; 3) expand communication among vertical teams in P - 16 to support students entering post-secondary education; and 4) review and measure learning outcomes at all levels, including higher education and demonstrate significant value - added for post-secondary options.

Parent Involvement in the School Program 2112.00 Parent Involvement Plan 2112.00 R1 Part - Time Classified Employees 6335.00 Part - Time Employees 6325.12 Payroll Deductions - Tax Sheltered Annuities 3921.00 Payroll Deductions - Tax Sheltered Annuities 3921.00 R1 Payroll Deductions - Tax Sheltered Annuities Approved Companies 3921.00 R3 Payroll Deductions - Tax Sheltered Annuity Deduction Agreement 3921.00 R1E1 Payroll Deductions - Tax Sheltered Annuity Requirements for all Vendors 3921.00 R2 Payroll Deductions - Tax Sheltered Life Insurance 3922.00 Performance Contract (Memorandum) 7116.30 E4 Performance Contract (Memorandum) 6222.10 E4 Performance Contract - $ 1,000 or less 7116.30 E2 Performance Contract - $ 1,000 or less 6222.10 E2 Performance Contract - over $ 1,000 not more than $ 5,000 6222.10 E3 Performance Contract - over $ 1,000, not more than $ 5,000 7116.30 E3 Performance Contract - Procedures 7116.30 R1 Performance Contract - Procedures 6222.10 R1 Performance Contract - Wage / Payment & Vendor / Contractor Determination 7116.30 E5 Performance Contract - Wage / Payment & Vendor / Contractor Determination 6222.10 E5 Performance Contracts 6222.10 Performance Contracts 7116.30 Personal Leave - All Employees 6225.00 R3 Personal Property Authorization 3934.00 E1 Personal Purchases by Employees 3872.00 Personnel Files 6410.00 Personnel Files 6410.00 R1 Petty Cash Purchase 3820.00 Physical Assaults and Threats 5610.00 Physical Examinations 6430.00 Physical Examinations 6430.00 R1 Positive Behavior Supports 8400.00 R1 Positive Behavior Supports and Interventions 8400.00 Post-Issuance Compliance for Tax Exempt and Tax Advantaged Obligations 3510.00 Post-Issuance Compliance for Tax Exempt and Tax Advantaged Obligations 3510.00 R1 Probationary Classified Employees 6343.00 Procedure for Workers» Compensation Insurance 6223.60 R1 Professional Staff Evaluation 6192.00 Program Evaluation 0540.00 R1 Program Evaluation 0540.00 Prohibition of Referral or Assistance Property Claim Form 3934.00 E2 Property Inventory 3220.00 Property Inventory 3220.00 R1 Proposed Guidelines for the Provision of Sex Education 7122.40 Public Complaints or Concerns 9600.00 Public Complaints or Concerns 9600.00 R1 Public Complaints or Concerns - Guidelines 9600.00 E1 Public Information Program 9120.00 Public Information Program 9120.00 R1 Public Records 8310.00 R1 Public Records 9110.00 Public Records 9110.00 R1 Public School Academies (Charter Schools) 2020.00 Public School Academies - Review and Approval of Application 2020.00 R1 Purchasing 3810.00 R1 Purchasing 3810.00 Purchasing - Department Responsibilities 3810.00 E1 Purchasing Cards 3810.00 R14

The AFT has also endorsed a promising way to get rid of bad teachers: peer - review programs in which excellent teachers work with struggling ones to improve performance - but in many instances end up recommending termination of employment.

Another witness today was James Webb, an English teacher from the William S. Hart Union High School District in Santa Clarita and a consulting teacher for the district's performance review program for first - year teachers.

Baltimore, Maryland, and Cleveland, Ohio, have adopted performance - based career ladders that allow effective teachers to assume differentiated roles within their schools, thus supporting colleagues who have less experience or skill; in other districts, consulting teachers both mentor and evaluate fellow teachers in peer assistance and review (PAR) programs.

Findings from literature reviews, case studies, and program evaluations suggest that districts should align recruitment, selection, and hiring procedures to a set of research - based leadership performance standards or competencies.

The Heartland Institute takes a look at Dr. Will Flanders annual review of school performance rankings and notes that, The results of these school choice programs should not be surprising.

The rubric gives structure to the performance review and supports program continuous improvement.

Principles and examples of performance based program review, strategies for efficiently reviewing reports, and examples and strategies for successfully writing the sections of the review will be presented and discussed.

Finally, REA reviewed achievement and other institutional data to assess the program's impact on student performance, including state licensing and certification records, graduation rates, and NYC teacher retention rates.

Data analysis and review of student level data conducted by the intervention team [Texas Education Code (TEC) § 39.106 (a) and 19 Texas Administrative Code (TAC) § 97.1071] is designed to identify factors contributing to low performance and ineffectiveness of program areas.

Some states also use data from performance assessments of principals, which are based on the ISLLC standards, to review and accredit programs as well as to assess the readiness of individual school leaders.

Designing and implementing strategies to improve contracting and bargaining practices, salary and compensation programs, performance review processes, and incentive programs for strong leaders; and

The Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty (WILL) has released its second annual peer - reviewed study of school academic performance across the Badger State, revealing charter schools and private schools participating in the state's school choice programs are outperforming traditional public schools...

Chapter 28, Sections 28.002 (Required Curriculum, 28.0021 (Personal Financial Literacy), 28.0023 (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Automated External Defibrillator Instruction), 28.005 (Language of Instruction), 28.0051 (Dual Language Immersion Program), 28.006 (Reading Diagnosis), 28.016 (Instruction in High School, College, and Career Preparation), 28.0211 (Satisfactory Performance on Assessment Instruments Required; Accelerated Instruction), 28.0213 (Intensive Program of Instruction), 28.0217 (Accelerated Instruction for High School Students), 28.025 (High School Diploma and Certificate; Academic Achievement Record) 28.0254 (Posthumous High School Diploma for Certain Students), 28.0255) Three - Year High School Diploma Pilot Program), 28.0258 (High School Diploma Awarded on Basis of Individual Graduation Committee Review), 28.0259 (Reporting Requirements for Students Graduating Based on Individual Graduation Committee Review Process) and 28.026 (Notice of Requirements for Automatic College Admission and Financial Aide);

The state requires that each local school system design a program incorporating components established by the state, including: an orientation program for new teachers prior to the start of the school year, mentor support such as regularly scheduled meetings during non-instructional time, opportunities for new teachers to observe and co-teach with skilled teachers with follow - up discussion of the experiences, ongoing professional learning activities, and ongoing formative review of new teacher performance such as classroom observation.

- Report program performance back to EPPs to promote continuous improvement - Publicly report on EPPs to increase transparency of EPP performance - Review EPP performance for accountability purposes (e.g., to make program approval or renewal decisions)

The purpose of this review was to assess PHMSA's experience with Integrity Management as a regulatory approach, to identify the challenges with applying Integrity Management in a regulatory context, and to offer suggestions to improve program performance.