Sentences with phrase «review purposes then»

To be fair I can't even afford all the clothes I feature, if I didn't get to share clothes sent for review purposes then content would be much lighter these days!

Not exact matches

Following this approach, the speaker first states the purpose of the presentation, and then shares why presentation is important by reviewing implications and possible outcomes.

What then is the purpose of constitutional review?

Thanks to the dugout feed, every team has access to video for review purposes, but the Red Sox then took that information and relayed it to players via Apple Watches instead of by the usual methods like signs or codewords or holding up a dry erase board.

A while ago I received this new I'm from Ginseng Serum from Wishtrend for reviewing purpose and I've been using it every day since then.

Students define 4 - 5 words, create crossword puzzles with a free online tool, and then share their puzzles for review purposes.

Purpose built for schools, kura and Communities of Learning Kāhui Ako, The Navigator is a self - evaluation tool utilising each of The Education Review Office (ERO) evaluation indicators to determine the status of your school and then use your data to plan your journey towards educational success.

1) First off... Read Jan Heine's article» Who pays for your subscription» 2) Then come around to the realization that NO review done by any magazine either online or in print is either unbiased or accurate 3) Which is to say these are the facts FCA / Alfa Romeo mandates anyone reviewing their product must print 4) Which is to say... there are no facts to be found here... only bought and paid for rhetoric with a healthy dose of the manufactures marketing spin mildly rewritten 5) Which is to say in conclusion... wake up and smell the fertilizer... magazines today's sole purpose is A) To market you to their advertisers... and A) To be a source of mildly information based entertainment... not the dissemination of facts specs and unbiased opinions

It is very apparent that a very tiny population of ACX users are potentially abusing the program, where they sign up as an «author» and then submit recordings of their «books», and in exchange are given a bunch of vouchers they can use to gift people copies of their book for free for review purposes.

I; m am very unsure if that paper has the ability to provide the core info / knowledge needed to address the seriousness and speed of «impacts»... sounds quite limited and the typical time - delay in punching out various models then analyzing the outputs and getting all that through all the science review hoops sounds inherently problematic and not fit for purpose, well imho but what would I know?

Literature reviews of previous studies serve a purpose as do the plethora of separate studies by acousticians, sleep experts and physicians, many of which draw the conclusion there is a strong prima facie case that low - frequency noise generated by wind turbines causes chronic sleep deprivation in some people which then degenerates to adverse health impacts.

We could then engage in a lengthy review of cases finding that «objects that have perfectly peaceful purposes may be turned into dangerous weapons and that such use may be punished under the federal assault statute.»

We would then regale readers with a review of possibly every case in the United States that has dealt with «whether body parts can constitute dangerous or deadly weapons for purposes of... assault and battery statutes.»

Binnie J. calls for a collapse of the two step approach (select the standard of review and then apply it) such that the 4 pragmatic and functional factors (privative clause / statutory right of appeal; relative expertise; purpose of the statutory scheme; nature of the question) are applied to assess the level of deference within a reasonableness review.

Using my Sony Reader I was then reviewed the transcript and made notes for cross-examination purposes.

This small subset was then batched to foreign language document reviewers with a certified fluency in German to review for substantive issue codes, privilege, and for overall case strategy purposes with outside counsel.

I mean, sure, at full disclosure, most of them are sent to me for review purposes, so therefore it is my job to wear them and then write about them, but out of...

If you are an individual on whom a HireRight client has requested a background screening investigation, and have submitted personal information to HireRight at the request of such client for purposes of procuring a background report, then you can review your HireRight file in accordance with your file disclosure rights under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, California Civil Code Section 1786.22 and any other applicable state laws by contacting HireRight's Customer Service Department at [email protected].

If you are an individual on whom a SmartStart client has requested a background screening investigation, and have submitted personal information to SmartStart at the request of such client for purposes of procuring a background report, then you can review your SmartStart file in accordance with your file disclosure rights under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, California Civil Code Section 1786.22 and any other applicable state laws by contacting SmartStart's Customer Service Department at [email protected].

However, if a spouse only wants an attorney to provide intermittent legal advice outside of the mediation sessions or only wants to retain an attorney for the purpose of reviewing a marital settlement agreement, then those are also options.

McKnight and Kashdan (2009) suggested that a clear purpose in life might facilitate the selection of goal - consistent behavior, which then may suppress goal - incongruent behavior (such as avoidance behavior evoked by negative affect), based on their review of recent findings about purpose in life.