Not exact matches
So throughout the book, especially on the extensive supplement
reviews chapter, Will makes reference to what the studies say and compares that with what the
real world results show.
Taking a neutral stance at this point on work from «NIPCC» (Fred Singer et al.), suggesting that this kind of effort «competes» with the work of several of the
world's climate scientists and a large number of multidisciplinary specialists contributing to IPCC reports combined with the additional scientists and many others who raise
real questions that
result from reading,
reviewing, evaluating and evolving the information in both IPCC summaries and domestic science and discussion of the science, is just not credible, in my humble opinion.
Taking a neutral stance at this point on rehashed work from «NIPCC» (Fred Singer and friends), well known for serial, serious errors in overall interpretation, analysis and communication of the science and transparent but largely unexamined ideological bias at play in their playground «reports» — never mind suggesting that this kind of effort «competes» with the work of the
world's climate scientists and the 2,500 multidisciplinary specialists contributing to IPCC reports combined with the tens of thousands of additional scientists and many others who raise
real questions that
result from reading,
reviewing, evaluating and evolving the information in both IPCC summaries and domestic science and discussion of the science, knowledgeably and in good faith and with open identification of the nature of the social and political issues — is just not credible.
As Mark Chussil points out over at the Harvard Business
Review, it isn't as if you can run a double - blind
real -
world study where one group of people makes one decision and the other group makes another, and you track the
results.
As a
result, many of today's
real -
world emails demand high - confidence responses that readers can instantly rely on without having to extensively
review supporting materials.
While PC
World potentially could have had an advance
review unit, the rest of the article has no
real benchmarks or test
results, so I'm thinking the statement was provided by Fujitsu; would love for someone in the know to comment and clarify.
It's better to look at the performance
results in our
reviews, such as Geekbench, which measures overall performance, as well as
real -
world tests we run.
Review of my credentials will confirm that I am a
results - oriented, retired New York Police Department professional with an extensive background of utilizing
real -
world education and aptitude, with capabilities of applying them to intelligence or security specialties within the college campus arena.
Review of my credentials will confirm that I am a
results - oriented, United States Marine Corp professional with an extensive background of utilizing
real -
world education and aptitude, with capabilities of applying them to intelligence or security specialties within the Federal criminal law enforcement arena.