Sentences with phrase «review research grant applications»

Not exact matches

AHRQ shares the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant application and review processes, including those for research studies (e.g. R01, R03), training (K - series), and small business.

Your grant applications test the feasibility of your research; peer review tests the soundness of your scientific arguments; undergraduates test your patience.

Based on Duke's investigation and ORI's review, officials concluded that Potti had included false research data in a grant application, a submitted manuscript, and nine research papers.

The Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation, for example, received more than four times its usual number of applications owing to cuts in NIH spending on breast cancer research, according to Paula Witt - Enderby, a researcher at Duquesne University in Pittsburgh and a member of the charity's grant review panel.

In addition, Shah might be able focus USDA on funding peer - reviewed, competitive research; the Gates Foundation is known for the rigor with which it reviews its grant applications.

The government has also struck a requirement, introduced by former research and education minister Daniel Funeriu, that international panels review grant applications and that applicants have papers published in an internationally ranked peer - reviewed journal.

T. A. Kotchen et al, «NIH Peer Review of Grant Applications for Clinical Research.»

Q: What measures are NSFC putting into place to promote research integrity and reduce misconduct in grant application and review of proposals?

Applications will be reviewed by subject matter experts at NIH and other health agencies to see if «they show a reasonable potential to meet the statutory goals,» says NIH's Jo Anne Goodnight, who oversees NIH's small - business research grants.

It's the first stop for any grant application; indeed, your grant application will be reviewed for scientific merit entirely within the CSR, regardless of which institute ultimately funds (or decides not to fund) your research project.

It's the first stop for any grant application; indeed, usually your grant application will be reviewed for scientific merit entirely within CSR, regardless of which institute ultimately funds (or decides not to fund) your research project.

As at the University of Arkansas, PIs at UMBC fill out most of the online grant applications themselves before research administrators review, complete, and submit the final applications.

A lower court's 23 August preliminary injunction halting hESC research «has a profound impact» that «disrupts not only the processing of grant applications currently under review by NIH, but it disrupts many of its currently funded grants, and it has already threatened ongoing programs to educate physicians and physician - researchers,» the brief states.

Paul's proposed solution starts with adding two members who have no vested interest in the proposed research to every federal panel that reviews grant applications.

Since 1946, the CSR mission has remained clear and timely: to see that NIH grant applications receive fair, independent, expert, and timely reviews — free from inappropriate influences — so NIH can fund the most promising research.

Based on a review of R01 grant applications during 2 review councils in 1994, Williams et al19 concluded that applications for patient - oriented research fared less well than laboratory - oriented research applications.

CSR organizes the peer review groups or study sections that evaluate the majority (70 %) of the research grant applications sent to NIH.

In 1996, in response to these concerns, Varmus, then director of NIH, impaneled a group of experienced clinical investigators and academic health center administrators to make recommendations that might guide the NIH toward policy changes to alleviate the concerns in the clinical research community.14 Several of the panel's recommendations have been implemented, including increased support of the General Clinical Research Center budget, expanded support of training in clinical research, and the establishment of NIH - sponsored educational debt relief programs for clinical investigators.15 - 18 The panel also recommended restructuring of NIH peer review groups so that patient - oriented grant applications would be evaluated by study sections in which at least half the grant applications involve patient - oriented rresearch community.14 Several of the panel's recommendations have been implemented, including increased support of the General Clinical Research Center budget, expanded support of training in clinical research, and the establishment of NIH - sponsored educational debt relief programs for clinical investigators.15 - 18 The panel also recommended restructuring of NIH peer review groups so that patient - oriented grant applications would be evaluated by study sections in which at least half the grant applications involve patient - oriented rResearch Center budget, expanded support of training in clinical research, and the establishment of NIH - sponsored educational debt relief programs for clinical investigators.15 - 18 The panel also recommended restructuring of NIH peer review groups so that patient - oriented grant applications would be evaluated by study sections in which at least half the grant applications involve patient - oriented rresearch, and the establishment of NIH - sponsored educational debt relief programs for clinical investigators.15 - 18 The panel also recommended restructuring of NIH peer review groups so that patient - oriented grant applications would be evaluated by study sections in which at least half the grant applications involve patient - oriented researchresearch.

As you may know, the lion's share of medical research funding in the U.S.A. comes from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), which is a government organization that reviews grant applications from scientists around the country and around the world and provides research funding for the best of those projects.

Although earlier reports emphasize that the percentage of NIH extramural grant dollars devoted to clinical research depends on the inclusiveness of the definition of clinical research, 5,14,18,29 the primary purpose of the current analysis was to describe outcomes of the scientific review of grant applications rather than to provide a comprehensive overview of extramural NIH funding for clinical research.

Nevertheless, there is a continuing perception among clinical investigators that the NIH peer review process may discriminate against clinical research.11 The purpose of this analysis was to describe recent trends and outcomes of peer review for grant applications requesting support for clinical research.

Conclusion Although physicians compete favorably in the peer review process, review outcomes are modestly less favorable for grant applications for clinical research than for laboratory research.

This is in contrast to the current modus operandi in which applications for research grants can take a year or more to make their way through the review system and are typically for multiyear projects.

In order to make sure samples are wisely used, OFA has arranged with CHF and the Morris Animal Foundation to review applications for sample grants to assure the scientific value of the research and that the samples will be used in a way that should benefit purebred dog health.

Grant seekers will find the information that they secek concerning the Foundation's grant application and review process and guidelines for research and education propoGrant seekers will find the information that they secek concerning the Foundation's grant application and review process and guidelines for research and education propogrant application and review process and guidelines for research and education proposals.

Academic reputations hinge on an ability to get work through peer review and into leading journals; university presses employ peer review to decide which books they're willing to publish; and federal agencies like the National Institutes of Health use peer review to weigh the merits of applications for federal research grants.

Re # 12: I think most of us would be quite surprised if the scientists reviewing US grant applications for climate science research (those who decide which proposals are funded) were really ``... the most antagonistic to evidence of AGW...».

• Develop and implement departmental administrative procedures • Manage calendars and schedules • Organize meetings and seminars and handle material acquisition duties • Ensure that university executives are appropriately prepared for meetings and conferences • Provide needed administrative support to student services • Plan the various logistics of university events such as budgets, speakers, promotions and communications) • Provide administrative support to HR by assisting with interviews and providing needed information • Provide administrative support to accounting department by preparing forecasts and reconciling budgets • Write and coordinate grant applications • Draft correspondence and prepare presentations • Take and record minutes of meetings • Prepare notices, memos and university agendas • Research information and record research summaries for university staff • Assist in designing and implementing university policies and procedures • Coordinate university affairs and events • Serve as a liaison to faculty, staff and alumni • Open, review and distribute incoming mail • Plan and arrange conferences and communicate arrangements to appropriate individuals • Supervise, monitor and coordinate activities of administrative staff • Take dictation from staff and faculty to prepare manuscripts and correspondence • Proofread and correct documents • Entertain visitors in the absence of supervisors • Maintain inventory of office supplies and equipment • Order supplies and manage paperwork necessary for purchasing • Design office filing systems and handle office records • Compile information provided by staff and faculty and organize it in the form of reports • Resolve routine conflicts • Follow up and track work flow and provide needed support to various projects • Train subordinates and assign appropriate work duties • Answer, screen and route incomiResearch information and record research summaries for university staff • Assist in designing and implementing university policies and procedures • Coordinate university affairs and events • Serve as a liaison to faculty, staff and alumni • Open, review and distribute incoming mail • Plan and arrange conferences and communicate arrangements to appropriate individuals • Supervise, monitor and coordinate activities of administrative staff • Take dictation from staff and faculty to prepare manuscripts and correspondence • Proofread and correct documents • Entertain visitors in the absence of supervisors • Maintain inventory of office supplies and equipment • Order supplies and manage paperwork necessary for purchasing • Design office filing systems and handle office records • Compile information provided by staff and faculty and organize it in the form of reports • Resolve routine conflicts • Follow up and track work flow and provide needed support to various projects • Train subordinates and assign appropriate work duties • Answer, screen and route incomiresearch summaries for university staff • Assist in designing and implementing university policies and procedures • Coordinate university affairs and events • Serve as a liaison to faculty, staff and alumni • Open, review and distribute incoming mail • Plan and arrange conferences and communicate arrangements to appropriate individuals • Supervise, monitor and coordinate activities of administrative staff • Take dictation from staff and faculty to prepare manuscripts and correspondence • Proofread and correct documents • Entertain visitors in the absence of supervisors • Maintain inventory of office supplies and equipment • Order supplies and manage paperwork necessary for purchasing • Design office filing systems and handle office records • Compile information provided by staff and faculty and organize it in the form of reports • Resolve routine conflicts • Follow up and track work flow and provide needed support to various projects • Train subordinates and assign appropriate work duties • Answer, screen and route incoming calls

Research Foundation, City University of New York, New York City College of Technology, Location 2006 — 2007 Grants Specialist Instrumental as a point - of - contact for faculty and staff for development of new grants and contracts applications, review drafts of proposals, budgets and other supporting documentaGrants Specialist Instrumental as a point - of - contact for faculty and staff for development of new grants and contracts applications, review drafts of proposals, budgets and other supporting documentagrants and contracts applications, review drafts of proposals, budgets and other supporting documentations.