Sentences with phrase «review whether the charter»

The SCC will review whether the Charter infringement is reasonable.

Not exact matches

New schools chancellor Carmen Fariña said last week she'll review the charter co-locations and openings approved by the P.E.P., but has been vague on whether she and de Blasio will consider reversing the approvals.

Topics included his reaction to Governor Cuomo's statement that he is not planning to approve a specific amount of pre-K funding set forth in the state senate proposed budget, how confident he is of pre-K funding, the status of his administration's review of the city's Sandy relief programs, his reaction to Governor Cuomo's statements on mayoral control of the city school system and charter schools, the current status of site clearing and the investigation into the cause of the East Harlem building explosion, whether New Yorkers should be concerned about gas leaks, his reaction to a tweet yesterday by Council Speaker Melissa Mark - Viverito critical of Governor Cuomo's reaction to the East Harlem building explosion, how the church services he attended this morning for victims affected him personally and the relief efforts being led by his wife, Chirlane McCray, and the Mayor's Fund for NYC.

The superintendent of the school district or principal of the charter school shall review the self - assessment (s) and make a recommendation to the commissioner, in such format and according to such timeframe as the commissioner may prescribe, as to whether the school or school district has made adequate yearly progress.

Require that there will be annual performance reviews of public charter schools created under this measure, and that the performance of these schools be evaluated to determine whether additional public charter schools should be allowed;

I don't know about whether there is anything unlawful going on and harmful is a subjective concept at times like these but the Hartford Courant story does provide us with an opportunity to take a moment to review what we do know about the charter school and education reform effort.

As Kelley notes in his legal review, charter operators often argue that all that matters is whether charter school students do well on standardized tests and that parents are generally satisfied with the schools» performance compared to public schools.

The decision did cite ongoing case law that requires the state to examine a series of issues in reviewing a charter application, including whether it would lead to racial segregation in schools.

NACSA: Special Education Toolkit for Charter School Authorizers Authorizers play a critical role in the lifecycle of a charter school, from reviewing and approving applications for new charters, through ongoing oversight and monitoring practices, and ultimately the decision - making processes to determine whether or not a school has earned the right to continue serving stCharter School Authorizers Authorizers play a critical role in the lifecycle of a charter school, from reviewing and approving applications for new charters, through ongoing oversight and monitoring practices, and ultimately the decision - making processes to determine whether or not a school has earned the right to continue serving stcharter school, from reviewing and approving applications for new charters, through ongoing oversight and monitoring practices, and ultimately the decision - making processes to determine whether or not a school has earned the right to continue serving students.

As voters decide whether to allow more charter schools, a Globe review has found that the schools enroll English - language learners at much lower rates than those in traditional systems, even as many charter schools have been stepping up efforts to recruit more of the students.

In the past, Connecticut law has required that the State Board of Education review and approve all charter schools applications before the schools can begin operating and one of the primary criteria was whether the General Assembly had decided to provide additional funding for charter schools.

These schools will be subject to strict oversight and public accountability, including annual performance reviews to evaluate their success in improving student outcomes and an evaluation at the end of the five - year period to determine whether additional public charter schools should be allowed.

These schools will be subject to annual performance reviews and an evaluation at the end of five years to determine whether additional public charter schools should be allowed.

In addition, all online charters should be reviewed immediately to evaluate the quality of their academic offerings and student achievement to determine whether their charter should continue.

The focus of the OCC's review of consumer complaints against national banks is to determine whether the banks» actions are consistent with banking statutes, regulations or any policies that are applicable to nationally chartered banking institutions.

[56] Thus, «On judicial review, the question becomes whether, in assessing the impact of the relevant Charter protection and given the nature of the decision and the statutory and factual contexts, the decision reflects a proportionate balancing of the Charter protections at play.»

This point goes to a tension in Doré between the duty of administrative decision - makers to consider Charter values and the role of a reviewing court which has to assess the reasonableness of the resulting decision and whether a proportionate balance was reached.

The SCC will review whether the appeal court mischaracterized the magnitude of the Charter breach.

29 That said, where a court of a Member State is called upon to review whether fundamental rights are complied with by a national provision or measure which, in a situation where action of the Member States is not entirely determined by European Union law, implements the latter for the purposes of Article 51 (1) of the Charter, national authorities and courts remain free to apply national standards of protection of fundamental rights, provided that the level of protection provided for by the Charter, as interpreted by the Court, and the primacy, unity and effectiveness of European Union law are not thereby compromised (see, in relation to the latter aspect, Case C - 399 / 11 Melloni [2013] ECR I - 0000, paragraph 60).

Having reviewed the European Charter and the lower court's decision in Goldeneye (International) Ltd v Telefonica Ltd [2012] EWHC 723 (Ch), [2012] All ER (D) 79 (Jul), his lordship concluded that many of the established principles for the grant of a Norwich Pharmacal order were relevant to the assessment of whether disclosure was proportionate under Art 8; the court's duty was to weigh the benefit of the information being sought by the RFU against the effect the disclosure was likely to have on the individual (s) concerned.

A court might specify that a Charter - compliant scheme would include limiting features such as: (1) approximately 30 - day time limits on separation, within which the prison can decide whether and how to arrange a transfer, dispute resolution, enhanced supervision protocols, medical treatment or other technique to facilitate return to the ordinary prison community; (2) a requirement that the prison obtain a court order for any separation that extends beyond the prescribed time limit; and (3) an independent, external authority to review placement decisions, conduct regular inspections of segregation units, and ensure the provision of ordinary programming and health care to segregated prisoners.

Contract — Formation — Negotiations for charter of vessel — Owners» offer expressed to be «Subject to review» of charterer's pro forma charterparty «with logical amendment» — Whether binding contract concluded — Whether any concluded contract void for uncertainty.

Furthermore, the Court did not undertake the usual steps in a constitutional analysis, i.e. by reviewing whether section 43 breached any of Ernst's Charter rights, and if so, whether it could be upheld as a reasonable limit on those rights under section 1 of the Charter.

(judicial review arising from failures of due process in the Bar's disciplinary arrangements discovered by a report by COIC in 2012; time expired disciplinary judges — whether a tribunal «established by law» under ECHR Art. 6 and Art. 47 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights; whether Art 47 now has direct effect in UK; whether laid down selection process of disciplinary judges had to be followed at all; whether prosecutor could partake in selection process of disciplinary judges; whether a disciplinary judge could properly receive an undisclosed salary from the prosecutor; whether logjam in Visitorial appeals process caused unlawful delay; whether proper Art. 6 security of tenure when BSB sits on committee (COIC) with the power to remove disciplinary judges from the «pool» at will; whether «discreditable» conduct should be defined).

Address to the Joint OFL / ONIWG Conference focuses on major problems in Ontario's system: experience rating; OH&S inspection; role of doctors, objective medical evidence and statistics in legal decisionmaking; actuaries; claims procedures — and whether judicial review, Charter are effective legal remedies.

The Senate and House of Commons should review and revise their respective amendment admissibility rules to allow committees to debate and vote on amendments that address Charter concerns regardless of whether they go beyond the «scope and principle» of a bill.

Our litigation review will be consistent with the direction that we have been given to ensure that they are consistent with our commitments — whether that be in the area of indigenous peoples or with respect to veterans or immigration — that they uphold the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and our values.»

[57] On judicial review, the question becomes whether, in assessing the impact of the relevant Charter protection and given the nature of the decision and the statutory and factual contexts, the decision reflects a proportionate balancing of the Charter protections at play.