Sentences with phrase «reviewed by a panel of judges»

The certification process consists of a 4 module test, including a mock resume and cover letter which is reviewed by a panel of judges.

Not exact matches

All entries are reviewed and judged by a prestigious, independent panel of international judges throughout the value chain.

All the wineries participating in IBWSS London and San Francisco will get a chance to be reviewed by the LWC panel of judges.

For TECH Challenge II, a panel of expert judges selected by Duke CTSI, in collaboration with FRI, reviewed and provided feedback on 85 proposals all focused on improved protective equipment.

More also, entries received for the competition will be reviewed by a distinguished panel of judges made up of professors from reputable Nigerian Universities, who will then shortlist 12 best essays for further assessment.

Jepsen, also a Democrat, announced in December 2013 that he was suspending an effort to get the U.S. Supreme Court to review a ruling against the state by a three - judge panel of the U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals in May of that year, and instead said he would try to limit the state's exposure to damages by seeking to negotiate a settlement with SEBAC.

Liff noted that the County's screening panel, which includes representatives from the borough's many smaller bar associations, has in the past rejected the prefered candidate of former party boss Vito Lopez and typically find the same judges to be qualified as the peer - review committees run by the bar associations.

The challengers — an alliance of energy and fossil fuel companies and coal - producing states — wanted the court «to do something that they candidly acknowledge we have never done before: review the legality of a proposed rule,» wrote Judge Brett Kavanaugh of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in an opinion unanimously backed by a three - judge pJudge Brett Kavanaugh of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in an opinion unanimously backed by a three - judge pjudge panel.

All nominations were reviewed by the Edison Awards Steering Committee and the final ballot sent to an independent judging panel comprised of more than 3,000 professionals from the fields of product development, design, engineering, science, marketing and education, and representing a wide variety of industries and disciplines.

The risk with these competitions when carried out by the Office of the Secretary is that they become politicized, that they are judged by review panels without methodological competence, and that they are overseen, once awarded, by career staff in program offices that do not have the background to monitor what is, at root, a program evaluation grant.

Judging Criteria: Entries will be reviewed by a panel of qualified judges.

More than 1,400 products across 13 judging categories were reviewed for consideration by a panel of specialty - equipment industry veterans.

In a dramatic twist, after being narrowed down by an expert three - judge panel, the top 10 finalists actually chose the ultimate SEMA Battle of the Builders winner in a frenzied but thorough peer review of vehicles at SEMA Ignited.

708 of the games moved on to finals where they were reviewed by an all - star judging panel composed of international mobile gaming experts and journalists, such as Ian Gregory (Witching Hour Studios), Kadri Ugand (Gamefounders), Alexander Fernandez (Streamline Studios), and Alysia Judge (IGN).

Every single work submitted is reviewed by Whitechapel Gallery curators and those shortlisted are judged by an expert panel of artists, critics and collectors including Angela de la Cruz, Nicoletta Fiorucci, Ben Luke and Jake Miller.

Applications were reviewed by panels of outside experts convened by NEA staff and each project was judged on its artistic excellence and artistic merit.

Every single work submitted is reviewed by Whitechapel Gallery curators and those shortlisted are judged by an expert panel of artists, critics and collectors

The judging panel for the 2017 NEON Curatorial Award are: Ben Eastham, Editor of The White Review; Nadia Schneider Willen, Collections Curator at Migros, Zurich; Tina Sotiriadi, independent curator, H+S Projects; chaired by Dr. Nayia Yiakoumaki, Curator Archive Gallery, Head of Curatorial Studies and Project Manager of NEON Curatorial Exchange & Award.

The eventual winner, Weismann's 2015 painting Library Guide was selected by a judging panel including Oliver Basciano, Deputy Editor of Art Review, Elizabeth Neilson, Director of Zabludowicz Collection, and Nathan Eastwood, winner of the East London Painting Prize 2014.

A panel reviewing a decision of a single judge under s. 680 (1) is to be guided by three principles: absent palpable and overriding error, the review panel must show deference to the judge's findings of fact; the review panel may intervene and substitute its decision for that of the judge where it is satisfied the judge erred in law or in principle, and the error was material to the outcome; in the absence of legal error, the review panel may intervene and substitute its decision for that of the judge where it concludes the decision was clearly unwarranted.

In contrast to virtually all of the other awards at tonight's event, the shortlist was put together by Legal Week «s editorial team, with the selected firms invited to make submissions which were then reviewed by our independent judging panel.

On appeal, these proceedings «by indictment» are reviewed by the Court of Appeal for Ontario usually before a three member panel of appellate judges although in rare cases a five member panel will sit.

Judging is based on a rigorous scoring methodology that includes a review by an independent panel of IAOP customer members with extensive experience in selecting outsourcing service providers and advisors for their organizations.

Rather, they are reviewed by three - judge panels of the district courts of appeal.

The CLE event featured an in - depth discussion by a panel of federal judges, offering a unique judicial perspective on the use of technology - assisted review.

* The nominees will be reviewed and selected by an independent panel of judges appointed by ACEDS management.

A refusal by a senior immigration judge to order reconsideration of a case by a panel of the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal can therefore only be reviewed under the statutory review procedure by a High Court judge, whose decision on the review is final, and judicial review of the refusal to order reconsideration is not available.

The court cited remarks by Edward L. Greenspan in a comment on a panel discussion at a law school in 1984, a criminology article that suggests that the media can be a source of victimization, and even a law review piece about the outrageous farce of the O.J. Simpson trial before the hapless Judge Lance Ito.

Asylum petitioner's voluntary withdrawal of petition for review following en banc reargument in the Ninth Circuit «threatens the integrity of our processes by inviting manipulation by parties unhappy with the questions at oral argument and fearful of the result they believe the court is going to reach»: So asserts Circuit Judge Alex Kozinski in an interesting dissent joined by three other judges on the fifteen - judge en banc pJudge Alex Kozinski in an interesting dissent joined by three other judges on the fifteen - judge en banc pjudge en banc panel.

Unlike my very favorable view of certain specialist tribunals like bankruptcy appellate panels (BAPs), I am a strong believer in review of social security disability denials by federal district judges.

21 These bases for en banc jurisdiction suggest that individual FISC judges must give stare decisis effect to any en banc panel decision that is not overturned by the Court of Review because, absent such a practice, the en banc panels would not fulfill one of their two statutory purposes: to secure or maintain uniformity.

All winners from around the world will be reviewed by a global panel of judges, and the finalists will be invited to an awards gala in New York on April 21st, where the global winners will be announced.

The CJC's new process is being used to consider the conduct of now Federal Court Trial Division Justice, and former Alberta Provincial Court Judge, Robin Camp, whose conduct of a sexual assault trial in 2014 led to a complaint being filed with the CJC by me, professor Jennifer Koshan (Calgary), professor Elaine Craig (Dalhousie), and professor Jocelyn Downie (Dalhousie) The CJC has struck a review panel to assess Justice Camp's conduct.

Justice Brown lamented an apparent increase in motions seeking panel reviews of decisions made by single judges of the Court of Appeal as follows:

Finally, in 2363523 Ontario Inc. v. Nowack, Justice Brown lamented an apparent increase in motions seeking panel reviews of decisions made by single judges of the Court of Appeal.

Nevertheless, the majority of the appeals court judges saw that the three - judge panel that overturned the case six months ago did not follow the U.S. Supreme Court limits on the scope of its review by examining outside evidence, as per Reuters.