Sentences with phrase «reviewed by real scientists»

Not exact matches

At least four independent peer - reviewed studies, using different methods, have found that around 95 - 97 percent of climate scientists or their peer - reviewed work agree that global warming is real, caused by humans, and potentially a serious threat.

There are observed temperature variations both on the surface, and sub surface, observed by real scientists called geophysicists, and peer reviewed papers relating to these observation have been published in reputable scientific journals.

The news here is that the previously denied «pause» has been accepted as real by mainstream climate scientists, has forced open the bounds imposed by previous modeling, and has been openly, unambiguously acknowledged by a peer - reviewed paper in Nature.

Real scientists outside of the field might be able to dispell myths faster by even a cursory review of the methods used.

As we have documented in numerous articles on the disinformation campaign on this website, although responsible scientific skepticism is necessary for science to advance, the climate change disinformation campaign has been involved not in the pursuit of responsible scientific skepticism but in tactics that are morally reprehensible including: (a) telling lies about mainstream climate scientific evidence or engaging in reckless disregard for the truth, (b) focusing on unknowns about climate science while ignoring settled climate change science, that is cherry - picking the evidence, (c) creating front groups and Astroturf groups that hide the real parties in interest behind claims, (d) making specious claims about «good science», (e) manufacturing science sounding claims about climate change by holding conferences in which claims are made and documents are released that have not been subjected to scientific peer - review, and (d) cyber bullying journalists and scientists.

He added that Dr. Craig Idso maintains a database of peer - reviewed papers by more than 1000 scientists from more than 400 institutions in more than 40 countries establishing that the medieval warm period was real, was global, and was at least as warm as the present and was probably warmer.

Hopefully his next propaganda film will be seriously reviewed by «real» scientists.

Of course, there is much more to climate science than a few sentences, but today we also know that multiple peer - reviewed studies show that 97 percent or more of climate scientists agree that climate change is real and caused by human activities.

No matter how well informed you are, no matter how many peer - reviewed studies you cite, or how many times you point out the overwhelming agreement based on the evidence that exists among climate scientists that global warming is real and is principally caused by human fossil fuel use, you will get no where.

This is why real scientists look at peer reviewed studies, not work by graduate students that is unreviewed and also outside of the student's field of expertise.

I was trying to ask if you have a reference for the «real root cause of globalclimatewarmingchange» where the reference is peer reviewed in an authoritative climate science journal approved by an approved climate scientist?