Sentences with phrase «reviewed climate study»

«Every peer - reviewed climate study goes through that red - team / blue - team treatment,» he said.

Every peer review climate study goes through that red team, blue team treatment.

Not exact matches

«According to the studies [the Government Accountability Office] reviewed, climate change may substantially increase losses by 2040 and increase losses from about 50 to 100 percent by 2100,» GAO wrote in a 2014 study.

According to this meta - study (a fancy name for a literature review), there seems to be a systematic tendency to downplay the economic costs of climate change policies:

Sarah Reece, a malaria researcher at Edinburgh University, UK, who reviewed the study but was not involved in the work, says that although interest in the effects of climate change on the transmission of malaria is increasing, details about the interactions between parasites and mosquitoes are often overlooked.»

«No climate bill has ever had this level of review, and the Obama administration stands behind this analysis,» Boxer said, explaining that EPA spent five weeks studying the House - passed bill and then worked for another two weeks on the Kerry - Boxer approach.

«These areas are most susceptible to climate warming in the coming century in Antarctica, because they are the closest to the melt threshold,» says climatologist Andrew Monaghan of the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colo., who was not involved in this study but reviewed the research.

Yang is lead author of the new study, which was published Thursday in the peer - reviewed journal Nature Climate Change.

«This appears to be a carefully timed attempt to reignite controversy over the science behind climate change when that science has been vindicated by three separate independent reviews and a number of studies.»

The new study published in the peer - reviewed journal Global Change Biology says such increased flow variability has the most negative effect on salmon populations of several climate factors considered.

Sallie Baliunas and Willie Soon of the Harvard - Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics reviewed more than 200 studies that examined climate «proxy» records — data from such phenomena as the growth of tree rings or coral, which are sensitive to climatic conditions.

Richard Muller, founder and scientific director of the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature Study, released a peer reviewed study concluding that climate change trends are due entirely to human carbon dioxide emissStudy, released a peer reviewed study concluding that climate change trends are due entirely to human carbon dioxide emissstudy concluding that climate change trends are due entirely to human carbon dioxide emissions.

He is postdoctoral researcher at the University in Bergen and the Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research in Norway, and lead - author of a new study published in Quaternary Science Reviews.

Meanwhile, a review of about 200 different temperature studies was published in 2003 by Willie Soon and Sallie Baliunas of the Harvard - Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in the journal Climate Research.

This statement stands in stark opposition to the actual findings of the world scientific community (e.g. the various National Academies, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)-RRB-, and the vast majority of actual peer - reviewed scientific studies.

It conducts interdisciplinary, peer - reviewed studies related to air pollution and greenhouse gases in China, from root causes in the energy demands to power its economy, to the chemistry and transport of pollutants in the atmosphere, to their impacts on public health, to policies to protect air quality and limit climate change.

Dr. Anastasios Tsonis co-author of the UW - Milwaukee peer - reviewed paper in March 2009, touted as a study which» Could Realign Climate Change Theory ``.

See Skeptical Science's profile of John Christy for a through explanation of why he is not a credible voice in the scientific community studying climate change, using peer - reviewed climate research as refutation.

James A. Edmonds • Member, IPCC Steering Committee on «New Integrated Scenarios» (2006 - present) • Lead Author, Working Group III, «Framing Issues,» IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (2007) • Lead Author, Working Group III, «Global, Regional, and National Costs and Ancillary Benefits of Mitigation,» IPCC Third Assessment Report (2001) • Lead Author, Working Group III, «Decision - Making Frameworks,» IPCC Third Assessment Report (2001) • Lead Author, Working Group III, Summary for Policy Makers, IPCC Third Assessment Report (2001) • Lead Author, Working Group II, «Energy Supply Mitigation Options,» IPCC Second Assessment Report (1996) • Lead Author, Working Group II, «Mitigation: Cross-Sectoral and Other Issues,» IPCC Second Assessment Report (1996) • Lead Author, Working Group III, «Estimating the Costs of Mitigating Greenhouse Gases,» IPCC Second Assessment Report (1996) • Lead Author, Working Group III, «A Review of Mitigation Cost Studies,» IPCC Second Assessment Report (1996) • Lead Author, Working Group III, «Integrated Assessment of Climate Change: An Overview and Comparison of Approaches and Results,» IPCC Second Assessment Report (1996) • Lead Author, IPCC Special Report, Climate Change 1994: Radiative Forcing of Climate Change and An Evaluation of the IPCC IS92 Emission Scenarios (1994) • Lead Author, IPCC Special Report, Climate Change 1992: The Supplementary Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment (1992) • Major contributor, IPCC First Assessment Report, Working Group III, Response Strategies Working Group (1991).

In addition, New peer - reviewed scientific studies now predict a continued lack of global warming for up to three decades as natural climate factors dominate.

The big takeaway from this study: While there is uncertainty in projections for changes in the climate indices reviewed here (especially El Niño and La Niña), this study serves to alert us to the fact that the climate impacts that our local coastal communities face are based in large part on changes that occur on both a large, global scale and over the long, decadal term.

One of his reasons to claim that «the risk of catastrophic anthropogenic global warming appears to be so low that it is not currently worth doing anything to try to control it» is that he uses a very low value for the climate sensitivity based on non-reviewed «studies», while ignoring the peer - reviewed work.

They are what create individual weather systems, like high pressure cells and storms,» Rutgers University climate researcher Jennifer Francis, who reviewed the new study, said in an email.

Yet you declare that their reviews of statistics, must be ignored because they aren't studying climate science???

The Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory (NWREL) posts a variety of online research, including Kathleen Cotton's ground - breaking 1996 study on small schools, School Size, School Climate, and Student Performance, as well as her December 2001 literature review, New Small Learning Communities: Findings from Recent Literature.

Authors of the analysis, to be published today in Review of Educational Research, analyzed 78 school climate research studies published between 2000 and 2015 to detect trends in findings.

This study reviews existing research on School Culture and Climate.

A recent report from Berkowitz et al (2016) reviewed 78 school climate studies going back to the year 2000.

This study identifies long range transportation planning (LRTP) best practices for climate protection and energy efficiency outcomes, which were selected based on interviews with LRTP professionals, a literature search, and a review of state LRTPs in the 29 states with Climate Action Plans, or gubernatorial initiatives directing state agencies to coordinate planning for climate and energy efficiency ouclimate protection and energy efficiency outcomes, which were selected based on interviews with LRTP professionals, a literature search, and a review of state LRTPs in the 29 states with Climate Action Plans, or gubernatorial initiatives directing state agencies to coordinate planning for climate and energy efficiency ouClimate Action Plans, or gubernatorial initiatives directing state agencies to coordinate planning for climate and energy efficiency ouclimate and energy efficiency outcomes.

This 2013 GMC Sierra 1500 SLE in Silver features: One Owner, 6 - Speed Automatic, 4WD, Ebony Cloth, All - Terrain Package, Body - Color Power - Adjustable Heated Outside Mirrors, Body - Colored Side Moldings w / Chrome Accent, Dual - Zone Automatic Climate Control, Front & Rear Carpeted Floor Mats, Front Halogen Fog Lamps, Heavy Duty Cooling Package, Heavy - Duty Air - to - Oil External Engine Oil Cooler, Heavy - Duty Auxiliary External Transmission Oil Cooler, Heavy - Duty Rear Automatic Locking Differential, Heavy - Duty Trailering Package, Inside Auto - Dimming Rear - View Mirror, Mechanical Brushed Aluminum Accents, Off - Road Suspension Package, Rancho Branded Shocks White w / Red Letters, Skid Plate Package.Awards: * JD Power Initial Quality Study Reviews: * Smooth, quiet ride; comfortable seats; powerful V8 options.

A review of artistic connections from the 80's presented in David Zwirner New York last May is a show, but also an excellent study of one time and cultural climate.

Secondly, the argument that the climate should have naturally «rebounded» with warming during the 20th century defies the actual peer - reviewed scientific studies which, as discussed earlier, suggest that the climate should have actually cooled during the 20th century, not warmed, if natural factors were primarily at play.

Meanwhile, a review of about 200 different temperature studies was published in 2003 by Willie Soon and Sallie Baliunas of the Harvard - Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in the journal Climate Research.

For example, Saunders quotes William Gray's off - the - cuff criticism of a study by Naomi Oreskes that demonstrated the existence of an overwhelming consensus in the peer - reviewed scientific literature on the reality of anthropogenic climate change (see our previous discussion of that study).

This statement stands in stark opposition to the actual findings of the world scientific community (e.g. the various National Academies, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)-RRB-, and the vast majority of actual peer - reviewed scientific studies.

Laken et al. (2012) recently provided an extensive review of the study of the GCR and Earth's climate, from the initial work by Ney (1959) to the latest findings from 2012.

I promoted Keith Kloor «s post on the paucity of coverage of a new peer - reviewed study on the health benefits of nuclear power (compared to coal), co-authored by James Hansen, who retired yesterday after 46 years of planetary and climate science at NASA:

[Update, July 29, 11:30 a.m. Some climate bloggers, led by «Tamino», have harshly criticized me for thinking I am qualified to post a review comment pointing to studies that appear to contradict the «superstorm» argument in the new draft paper by James Hansen and others.

Addendum, July 29, 11:30 a.m. Some climate bloggers, led by «Tamino», have harshly criticized me for thinking I am qualified to post a review comment pointing to studies that appear to contradict the «superstorm» argument in the paper.

Michael Mann of Penn State and Rasmus Benestad, a Norwegian climate scientist, has weighed in on Realclimate.org with a useful review of the new hurricane study in the context of other recent work.

The office of Senator James Inhofe, the Oklahoma Republican and ranking member of the Environment and Public Works Committee, released a report online today listing hundreds of scientists and links to peer - reviewed studies that it says challenge whether humans are dangerously influencing climate.

A new study led by Susan Solomon, a federal climate scientist and co-leader of the 2007 science review by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, is fascinating not only for the revelations, but the underlying lessonclimate scientist and co-leader of the 2007 science review by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, is fascinating not only for the revelations, but the underlying lessonClimate Change, is fascinating not only for the revelations, but the underlying lessons, too.

Related There's a new peer - reviewed study by Lawrence Cathles of Cornell University (on Dot Earth previously) reinforcing existing research pointing to the substantial climate benefit in a shift from coal to gas.

One of his reasons to claim that «the risk of catastrophic anthropogenic global warming appears to be so low that it is not currently worth doing anything to try to control it» is that he uses a very low value for the climate sensitivity based on non-reviewed «studies», while ignoring the peer - reviewed work.

Review here at RC showed the study had some serious weaknesses, but more so for my argument, that one study was touted across the deniosphere as a refutation of anthropogenic forcings and climate change itself.

Pearce makes the assertion (that I've also seen advanced by other authors) that IPCC models (that is, those upon which it bases its reports along with study reviews) do not adequately represent non-linearities in the climate system, & in particular do not correctly represent the potential for abrupt & rapid phase transitions.

Those curious about the senator's stance on the climate forecast can click on this link to a couple of relevant blog posts by staff for the minority on the Environment and Public Works Committee: «Global Warming Will Stop,» New Peer - Reviewed Study Says — Global Warming Takes a Break for Nearly 20 Years?

Finally, with drought and climate change in mind, Keith Kloor conducted an invaluable review of studies of the normal nature of American megadrought last month.

The discussion has centered on a new study reviewing how anthropogenic global warming was characterized in more than 12,000 climate science papers between 1991 and 2011.

For most recent sampling see: New Peer - Reviewed Study finds «Solar changes significantly alter climate» (11-3-07)(LINK) & «New Peer - Reviewed Study Halves the Global Average Surface Temperature Trend 1980 — 2002» (LINK) & New Study finds Medieval Warm Period «0.3 C Warmer than 20th Century» (LINK) For a more comprehensive sampling of peer - reviewed studies earlier in 2007 see «New Peer - Reviewed Scientific Studies Chill Global Warming Fears&raquReviewed Study finds «Solar changes significantly alter climate» (11-3-07)(LINK) & «New Peer - Reviewed Study Halves the Global Average Surface Temperature Trend 1980 — 2002» (LINK) & New Study finds Medieval Warm Period «0.3 C Warmer than 20th Century» (LINK) For a more comprehensive sampling of peer - reviewed studies earlier in 2007 see «New Peer - Reviewed Scientific Studies Chill Global Warming Fears&raquReviewed Study Halves the Global Average Surface Temperature Trend 1980 — 2002» (LINK) & New Study finds Medieval Warm Period «0.3 C Warmer than 20th Century» (LINK) For a more comprehensive sampling of peer - reviewed studies earlier in 2007 see «New Peer - Reviewed Scientific Studies Chill Global Warming Fears&raqureviewed studies earlier in 2007 see «New Peer - Reviewed Scientific Studies Chill Global Warming Fears»studies earlier in 2007 see «New Peer - Reviewed Scientific Studies Chill Global Warming Fears&raquReviewed Scientific Studies Chill Global Warming Fears»Studies Chill Global Warming Fears» LINK]