Sentences with phrase «reviewed general science»
Science has the largest paid circulation of any peer - reviewed general science journal in the world.
https://www.aaas.org/ Not exact matches
A general review of the endnotes from Gunter's paper reveals a fair number of sources who will corroborate the claim that Bergson's scientific views are nor only not outdated, but go very» much to the heart of current scientific methods and insights, but particularly, see A. C. Papanicolaou and Pete A. N. Gunter, eds., Bergson in Modern Thought Towards a Unified Science (New York: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1987), and for important background on how Bergson came to be seen as dated when he was not, see also, Milic Capek, Bergson and Modern Physics, (cited above) and The Philosophical Impact of Contemporary Physics (Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand, 1961), and the volume edited by Gunter, Bergson and the Evolution of Physics (cited above).
I don't know how science journals work in general, but in my field, papers wait months for review, acceptance, and publication.
The attorney general of Maryland last week sent a letter to the chairman of the House Science, Space and Technology Committee urging him to end a review of investigations being conducted by New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman into ExxonMobilegeneral of Maryland last week sent a letter to the chairman of the House Science, Space and Technology Committee urging him to end a review of investigations being conducted by New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman into ExxonMobileGeneral Eric Schneiderman into ExxonMobile Corp..
Mark Ferguson, director general of the funding agency Science Foundation Ireland (SFI), says the projects were first reviewed for scientific excellence by a panel of leading international researchers.
Founded in 1880 with the support of American inventor Thomas Edison, Science has grown to become the world's leading publication for cutting - edge research, scientific news, and commentary, with the largest paid circulation of any peer - reviewed general - science jScience has grown to become the world's leading publication for cutting - edge research, scientific news, and commentary, with the largest paid circulation of any peer - reviewed general - science jscience journal.
In his review, Crosbie Smith praises Stanley for producing a well - researched tome that is sure to «challenge the general reader and stimulate academic discussion,» but questions his use of Maxwell as a representative example of a theistic practitioner of science.
As for the science behind alternative medicine in general, «The peer - reviewed research is coming.
Each week Science reviews books, and occasionally work in other media, in all fields of natural and social science, as well as work relevant to the world of science in gScience reviews books, and occasionally work in other media, in all fields of natural and social science, as well as work relevant to the world of science in gscience, as well as work relevant to the world of science in gscience in general.
As a general guideline, we included only those who have completed a Ph.D. science degree and have published at least one peer - reviewed paper in a peer - reviewed journal.
Modern science depends on peer review and science in general has always required the ability of other scientists to duplicate your results.
Although as a general rule, dietary supplement labeling and marketing are not allowed to make disease prevention or treatment claims, the U.S. FDA has for some foods and dietary supplements reviewed the science, concluded that there is significant scientific agreement, and published specifically worded allowed health claims.
Boston, MA About Blog The Rheumatoid Arthritis page contains articles and information from the New England Journal of Medicine.The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) is a weekly general medical journal that publishes new medical research and review articles, and editorial opinion on a wide variety of topics of importance to biomedical science and clinical practice.
Boston, MA About Blog NEJM is a weekly general medical journal that publishes new medical research findings, review articles, and editorial opinion on a wide variety of topics of importance to biomedical science and clinical practice.
While the focus is on life sciences to prepare students for high school biology, to ensure they have the skills for projects and labs, students spend time reviewing general principles of science, the scientific method, measurement, and measuring using the metric system.
The What Works Clearinghouse review of Spelling Mastery for the Students With Learning Disabilities topic area includes student outcomes in nine domains: alphabetics, reading fluency, reading comprehension, general reading achievement, mathematics, writing, science, social studies, and progress in school.
Boston, MA About Blog The Rheumatoid Arthritis page contains articles and information from the New England Journal of Medicine.The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) is a weekly general medical journal that publishes new medical research and review articles, and editorial opinion on a wide variety of topics of importance to biomedical science and clinical practice.
If one does climate science, one has to be up on all the contributing disciplines at least to the extent that one knows the basics, the real experts, and could at least review a paper for general interest in the field.
What was KEY here is that she undertook to ensure my material was immediate sent to the State Scientist who was then responsible for summarizing the «science» for the Government to complete their Review of Gas Fracking and it's implications and a general RISK ASSESSMENT and Economics of it.
disambiguation, to be clear: both the NWF and the WWF produce both peer - reviewed science and more general blogs and columns.
Generally, the public forms views by what it sees in the media and internet (not peer - reviewed journals, academia, scientific conferences, or the consensus from the major science academies) and what I see in the general media a pretty even mix, with many outlets covering contrarians exclusively (such as the WSJ op - ed columns to name one of many).
Modern science depends on peer review and science in general has always required the ability of other scientists to duplicate your results.
So, not to blow sunshine up anyone's kilt, but, basically, this is science working as it should: 1) A crappy paper gets though the peer review process and gets published 2) Its subject matter is of sufficient general interest that it attracts the attention of experts who actually know what they are talking about.
* G. A. Schmidt, et al. (2004) «General circulation modeling of Holocene climate variability» Quaternary Science Reviews 23, 2167 — 2181.
It's clear he's not a huge fan of politically independent science in general; for example he wants to gut peer - review in the National Science Foundation's choices on what research to fund (instead, only allowing those that are politically appscience in general; for example he wants to gut peer - review in the National Science Foundation's choices on what research to fund (instead, only allowing those that are politically appScience Foundation's choices on what research to fund (instead, only allowing those that are politically approved).
In general, anyone who writes that they can dismiss some field of study practiced in research universities and published in peer - reviewed journals as «not really science» on the basis of a one - paragraph description of what science really is, is talking out of their ass.
But like I'm always telling those who write for Skeptical Science, peer - reviewed figures try to cram as much info as possible into a single graph while figures for the general public need to be as simple as possible.
Each contribution was reviewed externally and within the editorial structure of Climatic Change for accuracy in its portrayal of historical context and underlying science, but every author has been allowed to express his or her own opinion about how well the IPCC in general and the uncertainty guidance documents in particular have served IPCC's various clients — readers of the full assessments, readers of the technical summaries, and readers who have confined their attention to the overarching summaries for policymakers and synthesis reports.
Based on the findings of an investigation by Columbia University (CU) and additional analysis conducted by the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) during its oversight review, ORI found that Bengu Sezen, former graduate student, Department of Chemistry, CU, engaged in misconduct in science in research funded by National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), grant R01 GM60326.
A more nearly realistic characterization of the GCMs, relative to that portrayed by the quoted sentence and Climate Science in general, has been recently summarized in this peer - reviewed paper: Christopher Essex, Does laboratory - scale physics obstruct the development of a theory for climate?
Trump's pick to lead the Environmental Protection Agency, Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt, is a prominent denier of climate science, writing in the National Review in May that «the debate is far from settled» over whether human activity has contributed to the warming of the earth.
Professor Jones» review concluded with regard to science coverage: «in general, its output is of high quality».
Title XIV: Miscellaneous - Subtitle A: General Provisions -(Sec. 1401) Expresses the sense of Congress that federal agencies assessing risks to human health and the environment from energy technology, production, transport, transmission, distribution, storage, use, or conservation activities shall: (1) use sound and objective scientific practices in assessing such risks; (2) consider the best available science (including peer reviewed studies); and (3) describe the weight of the scientific evidence concerning such risks.
Too many elements of (thermo --RRB- mathematical maturity are missing from the Makarieva et al. manuscript, and missing too from critical reviews of it... and missing especially from skepticism of climate - change physical science in general!
They say three independent reviews into climate science - the key one being the Inter Academy Council review of the IPCC reports, due by August, will assuage doubts about climate science — adding that the IPCC's general meeting in October and its reports, due out some time in H2, on renewable energy and managing the risks of extreme events will also provide opportunities for a confidence boost.
By releasing the code, and opening it to general review and criticism, the report has allowed us to illustrate and discuss general problems in science software development, and to work towards resolving them.
The American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)-- the world's largest non-governmental and general scientific society and the executive publisher of the respected peer - reviewed journal Science — released a report on global warming on Tuesday.
Among other positions, Prof. Dr. Nakicenovic is Member of the United Nations Secretary General High - Level Technical Group on Sustainable for Energy for All Initiative; Member of the Advisory Council of the German Government on Global Change (WBGU); Member of the International Council for Science (ICSU) Committee on Scientific Planning and Review; Co-Chair, Scientific Steering Committee of the Global Carbon Project (GCP); Member of the Board, Climate Change Centre Austria (CCCA); Member of the Working Group of the Austrian Panel on Climate Change (AG - APCC); Member of the Panel on Socioeconomic Scenarios for Climate Change Impact and Response Assessments; Member of the Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century (REN21) Steering Committee; Member of the International Advisory Board of the Helmholtz Programme on Technology, and Member of the Earth League.
RIVERS:» [T] he general way to feel certain that you're getting good science is that you put your ideas out in a straightforward way in a peer - reviewed publication and you allow others who are doing the same work to make comments, to criticize, to replicate your findings.
A professor of medicine at Harvard and Director of the Tobacco Research and Treatment Center at Massachusetts General Hospital, Dr. Rigotti is a prominent tobacco - cessation researcher and the author of a February 2018 National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine Report that examined over 800 peer - reviewed scientific studies on the health effects of e-cigarettes.
In addition to assisting individual candidates, Nicole has provided SES consulting and / or editorial services to DHS Human Resources, DHS Science & Technology Directorate, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Professional Development Center, HUD Office of the Inspector General Human Capital Management Division, and NIH Center for Scientific Review.
Boston, MA About Blog The Rheumatoid Arthritis page contains articles and information from the New England Journal of Medicine.The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) is a weekly general medical journal that publishes new medical research and review articles, and editorial opinion on a wide variety of topics of importance to biomedical science and clinical practice.
Boston, MA About Blog NEJM is a weekly general medical journal that publishes new medical research findings, review articles, and editorial opinion on a wide variety of topics of importance to biomedical science and clinical practice.