Sentences with phrase «reviewed manuscripts»

When multiple peer - reviewed manuscripts provided psychometric data for a given instrument, the preponderance of the evidence needed to be consistent with our definition of «good» for a measure to qualify as «well - established.»

For classification purposes, we only considered psychometric data reported in empirical, peer - reviewed manuscripts, though our reviews include data from nonpeer reviewed manuals, chapters, and peer - reviewed reviews.

The self - report FAD has a very large evidence base arising from peer - reviewed manuscripts and, from quite early in its development, it has been used in medical populations (Kabacoff, Miller, Bishop, Epstein, & Keitner, 1990).

Create Resume JOSHUA LOPEZ 100 Main Street, Cityplace, CA, 91019 Home: [phone] — [email protected] Experience Editorial Project Director September 2009 to Current, Berkeley, CA Edited and reviewed manuscripts at all stages of production Managed updating and production of travel books Copy - edited marketing and catalog material Created assistant editor manual Trained employees in company computer programs -LSB-...] Continue Reading →

About Blog Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases (SOARD), The Official Journal of the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) and the Brazilian Society for Bariatric Surgery, is an international journal devoted to the publication of peer - reviewed manuscripts of the highest quality with objective data regarding techniques for the treatment of severe obesity.

Create Resume AVERY WALKER 100 Main Street, Cityplace, CA, 91019 Home: [phone] — [email protected] Professional Experience Editorial Project Director September 2009 to Current, Berkeley, CA Edited and reviewed manuscripts at all stages of production Managed updating and production of travel books Copy - editedmarketing and catalog material Created assistant editor manual, Trained employees in company computer programs -LSB-...] Continue Reading →

Create Resume Chloe Rodriguez 100 Main Street, Cityplace, CA, 91019 Home: [phone] — [email protected] Professional Experience Editorial Project Director September 2009 to Current Berkeley, CA EXPERIENCE Edited and reviewed manuscripts at all stages of production, managed updating and production of travel books, copyedited marketing and catalog material, created assistant editor manual, trained employees in -LSB-...] Continue Reading →

Reviewed manuscripts on an as - needed basis, assisting editors with revisions and amendments while gaining valuable experience working in a professional editorial setting

(There is one in his e-mail) He said he was working on 3 peer reviewed manuscripts based on these talks.

She has published 3 peer - reviewed manuscripts on sporting dog nutrition and exercise physiology.

Throughout her post-graduate training, she has maintained active research projects that have culminated in published peer - reviewed manuscripts.

Dr. Stepaniuk has authored peer reviewed manuscripts, textbook chapters, and clinical research on clinical topics pertinent and applicable to daily veterinary practice in dentistry and oral surgery.

Dr. Stepaniuk as authored peer reviewed manuscripts, textbook chapters, and clinical research on clinical topics pertinent and applicable to daily veterinary practice in dentistry and oral surgery.

He has authored several peer reviewed manuscripts and book chapters on these topics.

She has lectured extensively on animal behavior and continues to publish peer - reviewed manuscripts and book chapters regarding the ongoing work of the ASPCA.

Description: This 9 - month Assistant Professor or Associate Professor in Elementary Education (emphasis in mathematics) will teach undergraduate and graduate courses in Elementary Education, Special Education, and Curriculum and Instruction; deliver content in an online, hybrid / blended, and traditional face to face format; employ effective teaching and classroom management which enhances the success of diverse learners; develop new curriculum and modify existing courses, and actively seek and participate in professional development opportunities; This person must engage in scholarly work consistent with a well - defined research agenda that yields the procurement of extramural funding, publication of peer - reviewed manuscripts in top - tiered journals, and the facilitation of presentations at well - respected local, regional, and national conferences.

About Blog Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases (SOARD), The Official Journal of the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) and the Brazilian Society for Bariatric Surgery, is an international journal devoted to the publication of peer - reviewed manuscripts of the highest quality with objective data regarding techniques for the treatment of severe obesity.

For reviewed manuscripts, the editors strive to reach a decision in less than 30 days.

DOE is responding to a February 2013 memo from the White House directing federal research agencies to come up with a plan for allowing free access to taxpayer - funded, peer - reviewed manuscripts within 12 months after the paper appears in a journal.

In a victory for open access advocates, two U.S. lawmakers yesterday dropped a bill that would have banned the National Institutes of Health from requiring that its researchers submit their peer - reviewed manuscripts to a public archive.

The Federal Research Public Access Act (FRPAA), which has identical versions in the House of Representatives and the Senate, would expand to other research agencies the National Institutes of Health's (NIH's) 4 - year - old policy requiring investigators it funds to submit copies of their peer - reviewed manuscripts for posting in a public database.

Since 2008, NIH has required its grantees to post their peer - reviewed manuscripts in a free online archive after an embargo of up to 12 months following a paper's publication in a journal.

The Federal Research Public Access Act (FRPAA), H.R. 5037, builds on NIH's 2 - year - old requirement that grantees submit their peer - reviewed manuscripts to the free PubMed Central database for posting within 12 months after publication in a journal.

She started out editing peer - reviewed manuscripts for scientific publishers and has worked for six different medical journals so far — «regular work that kept me going,» she says.

More than nine in 10 of the academics interviewed in an international study said they reviewed manuscripts to play their parts as members of the academic community.

In peer - reviewed manuscripts and during presentations, they must effectively summarize data to introduce new hypotheses and results to their colleagues.

Dr. Williams has published over 50 peer - reviewed manuscripts, 75 conference presentations, and two book chapters in the area of child development and family relationships, including family based interventions to enhance health and well - being of parents and their children.

She reviewed manuscripts for publication, providing technical assistance to the public and professionals, and collaborated with NCHS staff and outside researchers to initiate, plan, design and author special analytic reports and presentations to the public health community.

I was reviewing my manuscript this morning for by book - in - progress, Close Your Church for Good, and was shocked to discover that somehow, somewhere, I lost about 15,000 words.

The authors» responsibilities were as follows — EJB: conceived the research aims, wrote the manuscript, and had primary responsibility for the final content of the manuscript; EJB, SN, and CT - S: analyzed the data; EJB, SN, CT - S, and ER: interpreted the results; EJB and BK: conducted the literature search; EJB, BK, and ER: designed the research, EJB and AJ: conducted the data extraction, and all authors: critically reviewed the manuscript for its content and approved the final version of the manuscript.

For several years, she was a Test Site Administrator and continues to review proposals for the NATA convention program, is an NATA Athletic Training Education Journal Advisory Board committee member, and reviews manuscripts for the Internal Journal of Athletic Therapy and Training.

Under the terms of these agreements, companies are given up to 30 days to review manuscripts.

When an editor asks you to review a manuscript, he or she is looking for a critical analysis of a paper's scientific rigor, significance, and relevance.

Journals give you between 7 and 21 days to review a manuscript and submit your review.

You've never reviewed a manuscript before.

First, reviewing manuscripts will keep you up to date on developments in your field.

I keep my paperwork (reading, writing, and reviewing manuscripts and grants) for the evening, so life is pretty full and hectic.

Yet there is much you can do to prepare, and it's worth putting in the time, because reviewing manuscripts has many indirect benefits.

Reading the scientific literature and participating in journal clubs are great ways to start preparing to review manuscripts.

Reviewing manuscripts means applying your critical skills to research that's often cutting - edge.

Meanwhile, the solution for individual reviewers can be simple: Don't agree to review a manuscript if you don't feel comfortable.

In a two - step system, the journal office receives the manuscript and assigns it to a member of the editorial board, who, in turn, either solicits reviews or reviews the manuscript personally.

Service to your research community — such as reviewing manuscripts and grant proposals, and doing it well — can pay real professional dividends.

This editing process occurs before the advisor reviews the manuscript, so that when the advisor and postdoc meet to discuss the paper, the conversation can focus on the science, not the writing.

He also reviews manuscripts for five journals and last year was invited to sit on the editorial board of the open - access journal PLoS One.

Representatives of the Collaborative Group of the Americans on Inherited Colorectal Cancers and the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons also reviewed the manuscript.

«However, until a peer - reviewed manuscript is published and all the details of the work become available to the scientific community, it is difficult to judge if this advance represents a meaningful leap in the state of the art.»

He is on the Board of Directors of the Cancer Cytogenomics Microarray Consortium and reviews manuscripts for many top journals in his field as well as having over 150 peer - reviewed publications.

Thanks to Dr David Priddel (Senior Researcher, New South Wales Department of Environment and Climate Change) for his oversight and foresight of the project, Dianne Gordon (Team Leader, Discovery and Learning, Healesville Sanctuary) for discussions and educational advice and Dr Tim New for reviewing the manuscript.

A.P., P.V., P.A., J.F., and T.R. analyzed the data and reviewed the manuscript.