Sentences with phrase «reviewed research publications»
Our Performance Minerals (metal amino acid complexes) are the most research - proven trace minerals on the market — backed by more than 200 peer - reviewed research publications.
http://www.petbusiness.com/ Not exact matches
The scientists, whose research is slated for publication in Psychological Science in the Public Interest, reviewed over 400 psychology studies and public interest surveys.
Darren Sherkat was indeed the scholar engaged by the editor of Social Science Research, James Wright, to conduct an internal audit of the review process that led to the publication of Regnerus's findings in the New Family Structures Study.
ITASCA, IL (October 31, 2016)-- The publication of third - party, peer - reviewed research in a recent edition of the Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B supports the corrugated industry's commitment to science and facts when communicating about packaging materials.
The publication of third - party, peer - reviewed research in a recent edition of the Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B supports the corrugated industry's commitment to science and facts when communicating about packaging materials.
As a research - driven organization led by nutrition scientists, the McCormick Science Institute is focused on advancing the scientific study of the health and wellness properties of spices and herbs, with all research teams required to submit their findings to reputable, peer - reviewed scientific journals for publication.
It's hard to know, says T. Lawrence Bottom of the psychology department at DePaul University, who looked into what research has appeared in peer - reviewed publications since 1990.
M: I think it is very important that research papers that come from the MANA Stats Project's datasets go through the process of rigorous peer review required for publication in an academic journal.
All academic journals require that researchers go through ethics or IRB review before conducting research, so this process also insures that applicants to the data set will be able to take their work through to publication if they so choose.
Please send information relating to any current research, publications or working papers on fathers that you have written which you feel Lewis & Lamb might not know about and which should go into a review.
Folks in the NCB movement tout «research» but none of it is actually validated or reproduced in any peer - reviewed publication.
Reports by Project Ready researchers have been published in academic journals such as Journal of Youth and Adolescence, Journal of Adolescent Research, Journal of Family Psychology and other peer - reviewed publications.
In addition to the quarterly peer reviewed Journal of Prenatal and Perinatal Psychology and Health (JOPPPAH), the official scientific publication of APPPAH, we publish the APPPAH Newsletter and hold regional and international conferences, promote research, serve the public with valuable directories and resources, and work to enhance the pregnancy experience and maximize the health of both mothers and babies.
To make sure that we represent the science accurately, we have a board of seven expert advisers from a variety of fields (including economics, medicine and policy) who review all of our publications, provide us with guidance, and occasionally collaborate on joint research projects.
On January 12, AAAS responded to a Request for Information by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy on public access to peer - reviewed publications resulting from federally - funded research.
[BOX 5] Alliance of Third Class Non-Profit Mailers, 1981 - 1982 Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs (OES) files I, 1981 II, 1980 - 1981 III, 1978 - 1980 IV, 1979 - 1980 Council of Allied Engineering and Scientific Societies, 1969 - 1981 Council of Allied Engineering and Scientific Societies, 1981 - 1982 Department of Education, 1977 - 1978 Energy Research Advisory Board Multiprogram Laboratory Panel, 10/15/81 -11 / 19/82 Institute of Medicine - I, 1982 - 1983 Institute of Medicine - II, 1979 - 1982 Roger W. Jones Award, 1979 - 1980 W. K. Kellogg Foundation, 1982 Mellon (Andrew W.) Project, 1978 National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA) Files: I, 1981 - 1984 National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA) Files: II, 1981 - 1982 National Committee on Public Employee Pension Systems (PEPS), July 1982 National Governors» Association Meeting - Task Force on Technological Innovation, 2/21/82 National Publication Act of 1979 Office of Technology Assessment, 1972 - 1973 Peace and Conflict Resolution, 1980 Pensions for Professionals, 1971 - 1972 Saturday Review of Science, 1972 - 1979 Scientists and Engineers Emigrant Fund, 1978 - 1979 SOHIO, Standard Oil of Ohio Grant, 1982 - 1986 Technology in Science - Advisory Board, 1981 Tyler Prize, 1984 - 1985 White House Study of Science and Engineering Education, 1980 Znaiye (Soviet Scholarly Society), 1971 - 1977
The new rules are «a tremendous step forward,» says Ebright, who says the obligation for prior review of research proposals is «critically important» and should prevent cases such as the two H5N1 studies, whose potential biosecurity and biosafety implications were raised only on the eve of publication of their results.
The industry coalition won a court order in 2001 after the government mishandled a procedural filing, forcing scientists to turn over all data and drafts of research papers before publication, for a 90 - day review period.
Founded in 1880 with the support of American inventor Thomas Edison, Science has grown to become the world's leading publication for cutting - edge research, scientific news, and commentary, with the largest paid circulation of any peer - reviewed general - science journal.
► «Last month, the National Science Foundation unveiled a plan to require its grantees to make their peer - reviewed research papers freely available to the public within 12 months of publication,» wrote Jocelyn Kaiser in this week's Science.
In response, a spokesperson for Nature, which published the papers being scrutinised (DOI: 10.1038 / nature12968; DOI: 10.1038 / nature12969), says: «The editors select research for publication on the basis of scientific significance, and each published paper undergoes robust, rigorous peer review.
As a non-profit organization with its mission to advance science and serve society, peer - reviewed research content becomes freely available with registration on our website after a 12 - month embargo period from the date of publication.
In order to assess the impact of your publications and research, committees often will study your citations during reviews for promotion and tenure.
... Without the defined academic productivity and rank requirements of the TTT type (e.g., «publish or perish»), clinician — educator faculty who face ever - increasing clinical demands may put less emphasis on producing measurable academic products, such as publications in peer - reviewed journals or grant - funded research.»
In its first six months the Trump administration has suspended or placed under review a total of 47 Obama - era rules, according to a list of Federal Register filings compiled by Rena Steinzor, a professor at the University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law, and law student Elise Desiderio, with additional research by this publication.
The reality is this: the science in the 2015 paper is impeccable and has been replicated and confirmed by other research groups publishing in peer - reviewed journals; data used in the paper were not experimental, biased or improperly archived; and the paper was not rushed to publication.
Following an inquiry into peer review in scientific research, U.K. parliamentarians have concluded that, despite many criticisms and little evidence of its effectiveness, the traditional practice of having research articles evaluated by anonymous colleagues before publication is valued by the community and shouldn't be completely abandoned.
The Review is a super refined weekly web publication curated by subject matter experts from Yale who summarize important research articles from leading natural and social science journals with the hope that people can make more informed decisions using latest research results.The Review launched this week and covers a wide range of topics, like this brief about climate change and biodiversity («Biodiversity Left Behind in Climate Change Scenarios»): They find that simply using the traditional classification of a species in climate change simulations can underestimate the true scale of biodiversity loss.
The panel found that the existing grant review process, in which NHP studies undergo extra scrutiny by NC3Rs, generally works: Most research was justified in its use of NHPs and led to peer - reviewed publications.
The Federal Research Public Access Act (FRPAA), H.R. 5037, builds on NIH's 2 - year - old requirement that grantees submit their peer - reviewed manuscripts to the free PubMed Central database for posting within 12 months after publication in a journal.
Have a strong track record of publications in peer - reviewed journals and have established research collaborators through joint authorship of their research papers.
AAAS Comments on Public Access On January 12, AAAS responded to a Request for Information by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy on public access to peer - reviewed publications resulting from federally - funded research.
According to this standard script, the need for secrecy prevents industrial scientists from pursuing a research career's highest goal: recognition by fellow scientists for priority in significant advances, documented by widely cited, peer - reviewed publications.
To implement these reporting practices, most journals rely on the process of peer review — in which other scholars review research findings before publication — but relatively few journals measure the quality and effectiveness of the process.
Following an enquiry into peer review in scientific research, U.K. parliamentarians have concluded that, despite many criticisms and little evidence of its effectiveness, the traditional practice of having research articles evaluated by anonymous colleagues before publication is valued by the community and shouldn't be completely abandoned.
This research is presented in Concussions, Traumatic Brain Injury, and the Innovative Use of Omega - 3s, a review article from the Journal of the American College of Nutrition, official publication of the American College of Nutrition.
To back up those claims, T.A. Sciences plans to submit research demonstrating TA - 65's effects on bone density, immune function, and age - related biomarkers for peer - reviewed publication this year.
Known for their rigorous, fair peer review and fast publication times, our journals publish the best science, from original research articles to authoritative reviews.
Ocean Science (OS) is an international open - access scientific journal dedicated to the publication and discussion of research articles, short communications, and review papers on all aspects of ocean science: experimental, theoretical, and laboratory.
The research paper, «GW151226: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a 22 Solar - mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence,» by the LIGO Scientific Collaboration and the Virgo Collaboration, has been accepted for publication in the journal Physical Review Letters.
The monthly, peer - reviewed Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine is the official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, a professional membership society that improves sleep health and promotes high quality patient centered care through advocacy, education, strategic research, and practice standards (www.aasm.org).
Veterans of the Gulf War are more than twice as likely to have medically unexplained symptoms known as «multisymptom illness» (MSI), compared to Iraq / Afghanistan War veterans, according to an updated research review in the July Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, official publication of the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM).
The role of research integrity in the very structure of contemporary science, addressing cultural practices in its publication system, current ethical challenges in peer review and its consequences regarding the reliability of the research record.
The contributions and impact of Oehmen's early career research in data - intensive analytics applications have already resulted in 17 peer - reviewed publications in the open scientific literature, 3 book chapters, invited oral presentations at scientific conferences, and the release of the ScalaBLAST software.
His publications have included major contributions to six textbooks and forecast manuals, together with over 100 peer - reviewed research papers.
Her research and activity are well documented in many peer - reviewed publications and reports.
appropriate scientific and professional knowledge required to carry out the research described (documented by peer - reviewed publications);
Most of my posts are in - depth reviews of recent research publications or editorials from my perspective working at at a large - scale sequencing center in the United States.
A BSc (Hons) in Physics or in a related field is essential and applicants must also have research experience in a related field of physics at PhD level (or thesis submitted before appointment) or above and have publications in recognised peer - reviewed journals.
Complaining in particular that «unreasonable or obstructive reviews» and reliance on a limited group of reviewers led to the publication of truly original research being delayed or prevented, Professor Smith organised the writing of a letter of protest, which was signed by a group of key stem cell researchers and sent to leading journals.