Sentences with phrase «reviewed scientific research papers»

The author of Eat Stop Eat — Brad Pilon — has studied over 317 peer reviewed scientific research papers.

The author of Eat Stop Eat — Brad Pilon — has studied over 317 peer reviewed scientific research papers.

The author of Eat Stop Eat — Brad Pilon — has studied over 317 peer reviewed scientific research papers.

Not exact matches

Does an academic's use of legal threats to stop a critical paper from being published subvert the peer review process, which is fundamental to modern scientific research?

Science Watch, a review of the Web research tool Essential Science Indicators, found a decline in U.S. representation among the world's published scientific papers, dropping from 38.5 percent in 1990 to 33.3 percent in 2004.

In response, a spokesperson for Nature, which published the papers being scrutinised (DOI: 10.1038 / nature12968; DOI: 10.1038 / nature12969), says: «The editors select research for publication on the basis of scientific significance, and each published paper undergoes robust, rigorous peer review.

In a 2006 review of 842 scientific papers on omega - 3 fatty acids and cardiovascular disease, a research team based at the TuftsNew England Medical Center in Boston concluded that only EPA and DHA seemed beneficial — ALA, their plant - produced precursor, was not.

So, the research team introduced a chronology developed by collecting established fossil dates reported in dozens of already - published and peer reviewed papers in an array of scientific journals.

«I was surprised to see as much effect as there was,» said Adrian Melott, professor of physics at the University of Kansas, who co-authored the new paper appearing The Astrophysical Journal Letters, a peer - reviewed express scientific journal that allows astrophysicists to rapidly publish short notices of significant original research.

This review sets the stage for the potential research the scientific community can do to allow for safe long term space exploration» said Afshin Beheshti, an author of the paper and a Bioinformatician at NASA Ames Researchresearch the scientific community can do to allow for safe long term space exploration» said Afshin Beheshti, an author of the paper and a Bioinformatician at NASA Ames ResearchResearch Center.

The LIGO Scientific Collaboration cited O'Shaughnessy's research in the paper announcing its third discovery of gravitational waves that published in Physical Review Letters on June 1.

That paper, which appeared in the journal Critical Reviews in Toxicology, reviewed the IARC findings and concluded the scientific research didn't support claims that glyphosate posed a risk of genetic toxicity.

The report, titled «Knowledge, Networks and Nations: Global Scientific Collaboration in the 21st Century,» analyzes peer - reviewed science papers with abstracts in English to assess which countries were claiming slices of an expanding research pie.

Ocean Science (OS) is an international open - access scientific journal dedicated to the publication and discussion of research articles, short communications, and review papers on all aspects of ocean science: experimental, theoretical, and laboratory.

The research paper, «GW151226: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a 22 Solar - mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence,» by the LIGO Scientific Collaboration and the Virgo Collaboration, has been accepted for publication in the journal Physical Review Letters.

A number of scientific results suggest a biological basis for sexual orientation, but these results do not point to one simple biological or genetic explanation.2 Perhaps the best recent reviews of the scientific research relevant to this issue are found in a special issue of the journal Frontiers of Neuroendocrinology, the official journal of the International Neuroendocrine Federation and the American Neuroendocrine Society, that was published in April 2011.3 The papers in the special issue make clear that substantial evidence exists in animals for biological bases of sexual partner preference based on sex.

Varmus, a Nobel Laureate, President and CEO of Memorial Sloan - Kettering Cancer Center, and member of the Academy's President's Council, led the team of biomedical scientists who set out in October 2000 to liberate access to scientific research in their field by petitioning publishers to post peer - reviewed papers in free, public online archives.

He has delivered lectures at prestigious conferences and seminars in his research field and has published and reviewed papers for leading scientific journals.

Acknowledgments: This review paper was supported by the Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences Division, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy; PNNL's Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program; and EMSL, a national scientific user facility.

His government research funding dried up, and, for many years, most peer - reviewed scientific journals refused to publish his papers.

So, when a scientific paper is published, its authors list other studies that they had reviewed while doing their research.

A paper describing the research was published in the scientific journal Physical Review Letters.

It is currently the largest dog research group in the world, has over 100 publications in peer - reviewed journals, with several papers in the highest ranking scientific journals such as Science, Current Biology and Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

Dr. Ghannoum's scientific research has resulted in over 400 peer reviewed scientific papers, and his publications have been cited over 18,000 times.

Please read my Forks Over Knives review for more information on what's wrong with the conclusions drawn from Campbell's casein / aflatoxin research, and if you'd rather look at peer - reviewed research than the words of some random internet blogger, see my collection of scientific papers based on the China Study data that contradict the claims in Campbell's book.

Professor Khalid Khan of Queen Mary University has reviewed dozens of scientific research papers on attraction and dating.

So I took advice from a scientist at Queen Mary University, Prof Khalid Khan, who has reviewed dozens of scientific research papers on attraction and online dating.

Because so much of what we do hasn't been done before, the line between research This scientific journal is dedicated for the publication of peer reviewed research papers, all scientists are invited to contribute with new scientific

Sharing a paper with sympathetic colleagues is no substitute for a system of blind peer review — a bedrock principle of scientific research.

It contains news, opinion, letters, scientific reviews and original research papers and communications on a wide range of veterinary topics, along with disease surveillance reports, obituaries, careers information, business and innovation news and summaries of research papers in other journals.

OrthoPets has conducted significant research and has published a peer reviewed scientific paper describing the successful use and outcome of an OrthoPets Stifle Orthosis (dog knee brace).

Professor Mann's research papers have been published in well respected peer - reviewed scientific journals.

«The IPCC does not do scientific research itself, but builds its assessments on peer - reviewed and published scientific papers.»

Of course it is worth knowing that 97 % of research papers and / or their authors attribute global warming to humans but as the video says, it's the science behind it that counts, and just because the papers are peer reviewed in itself proves nothing about whether the scientific proposal / theory is necessarily right.

A recent scientific paper, Cowtan and Way (2014) used in - filling to contradict other peer - reviewed research that determined a pause to global warming for the past 15 years or more.

Dr. Singer has published more than 200 technical papers in peer - reviewed scientific journals, including Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Energy & Environment, EOS: Transactions of the AGU, Geophysical Research Letters, International Journal of Climatology, Journal of Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, Nature, and Science.

Two of the papers conduct no actual scientific research but merely review social aspects of climate science.

For our research, we reviewed and analysed thousands of scientific papers on global warming and climate change.

It may not be a part of the scientific process (peer review, etc.) for authors of published papers to put their research into context, but it would lead to better reporting.

c. Bear in mind, that these «skeptic scientists» are, believe it or not, generally highly qualified, not just dumb «science deniers», either because they managed to survive the test of long «research funding drought» and extreme hard scrutiny of their papers in the peer review process (as opposed to papers supporting «consensus» compatible views, Naomi Oreskes may introduce a weighing factor in their paper count), or because they just can not be ignored due to their high scientific merits / awards or because they are financing themselves, or because they are already retired or semi retired, now independent from funding.

Peiser has long opposed mainstream science's conclusions about anthropogenic global warming; in 2005 Peiser said he had data which refuted an article published in Science Magazine, claiming 100 % of peer - reviewed research papers on climate change agreed with the scientific consensus of global warming.

Our peer - reviewed paper Quantifying the Consensus on Anthropogenic Global Warming in the Scientific Literature is freely available at the Environmental Research Letters (ERL) website.

For the story, I reviewed dozens scientific research papers, and used information and quotations from two interviews.

On October 12, 2006, Peiser admitted that only one of the research papers he used in his study refuted the scientific consensus on climate change, and that study was NOT peer - reviewed and was published by American Association of Petroleum Geologists.

«Co-authored and co-edited by Dr. Craig Idso, Professor Robert Carter, and Professor S. Fred Singer who worked with a team of 44 other climate experts, this document cites more than 1,000 peer - reviewed scientific papers to show that the IPCC has ignored or misinterpreted much of the research that challenges the need for carbon dioxide (CO2) controls.

Scientists involved in those studies said they would welcome new peer - reviewed research, but they contend that Muller is violating scientific protocol by publicizing his project, underway for months, before it produces any vetted scientific papers.

I am also wondering whether Hansen's explicit policy advocacy, coupled with a scientific research paper (esp one that had not undergone peer review), contributed to distrust of the research?

One approach would be to review how research papers are treated here at RC by both post authors and by the commenters, perhaps with an eye to comments that do not address anything scientific and thus arguably reflect bias such as calling people «ignorant food tubes» and such.

Climate of the Past (CP) is an international scientific journal dedicated to the publication and discussion of research articles, short communications, and review papers on the climate history of the Earth.

A search of the Science Citation Index, the comprehensive scientific journal database that indexes virtually every citation a journal article gets in the peer - reviewed scientific literature, reveals that this paper, which Dr. Singer calls a «key research publication», has been cited exactly zero times, as of 2004 (for comparison, Dr. Steven Schneider's 1988 publication in Nature on the same topic, «Simulating the climatic effects of nuclear war», has gotten 16 citations).