Not exact matches
Harold E. Varmus, the director of the N.I.H., said the goal of the revision was to reduce «the amount of budgetary information requested from applications, allowing investigators, research institutions, peer
reviewers, and N.I.H. staff to focus most intently on the science
during the peer -
review process.»
It has come to my attention, on more than one occasion that authors like to nag potential book
reviewers during the book
review process.
Over 100 Contributing Authors submitted draft text and information to the Lead Authors and over 150
reviewers submitted valuable suggestions for improvement
during the
review process.
Some
reviewers, probably skeptics, have reported irregularities with the
review process during the preparation of IPCC reports.
All written expert, and government
review comments will be made available to
reviewers on request
during the
review process and will be retained in an open archive in a location determined by the IPCC Secretariat on completion of the Report for a period of at least five years.
But since, according to various Team members, no
reviewer ever asks for the data
during the
review process (or presumably afterwards either), it obviously doesn't matter if one set of data is substituted for another after the
review is finished.