Sentences with phrase «reviewing editors by»

Word - of - mouth was equally important for Barnes and Bero, who were both invited to serve as reviewing editors by an editor - in - chief.

Of these many qualified experts, the following were selected for nomination as lead authors or review editors by the United States Government.

Governments, Observer Organizations and IPCC Bureau Members have been requested to submit nominations of Coordinating Lead Authors, Lead Authors and Review Editors by Friday 27 October 2017 (midnight GMT +1).

Not exact matches

Financial statements and annual reports were reviewed by reporter Douglas Elam, accounting specialists Rhona Altschuler, Cappy Lyons and markets editor Kathleen Smyth.

Commentary by Larry Kudlow, a senior contributor at CNBC and economics editor of the National Review.

Only a few days before Trump's Inauguration and The Review's anniversary event, Thiel attended the pro-Trump and heavily alt - right - attended «Deploraball,» which had been in part organized by Jeff Giesea» 97, a former Review editor - in - chief who once worked at Thiel Capital Management.

Moderated by Danny Sullivan, editor - in - chief of Search Engine Land, this kickoff session reviewed the basics of what you need to know in the world of SMM.

I'm not inclined to argue with that judgment by Adam Wolfson, executive editor of the Public Interest, who is reviewing To Empower People: From State to Civil Society (edited by Michael Novak, AEIPress).

The task of reviewing the selection and balance of topics has been made easier by the editors, who have thoughtfully provided what they call a «synoptic outline of contents,» in which the entries are arranged and listed in «conceptual categories.»

James Finn is Senior Editor of Freedom Review, published by Freedom House, a human rights advocacy group based in New York City.

Beegle's first book, The Inspiration of Scripture, proved to be the most controversial book within evangelicalism in the early sixties.25 Published in 1963, it was given ten pages of review in Christianity Today by editor Carl Henry and contributing editor Frank Gaebelein.

[Editor's note: This response to David Pailin's review of Ford book, Transforming Process Theism, was commissioned by the editor of Process Studies after David Pailin had written his review of Ford'sEditor's note: This response to David Pailin's review of Ford book, Transforming Process Theism, was commissioned by the editor of Process Studies after David Pailin had written his review of Ford'seditor of Process Studies after David Pailin had written his review of Ford's book.

A Lutheran pastor who also serves as director of the Visual Education Service at Yale Divinity School, where he has taught courses on media and ministry, Everist has served as editor of Please Copy, has written a soon - to - he published book on Creative Uses of Media by the Church, and has created a four volume review publication, Educaid.

Darren Sherkat was indeed the scholar engaged by the editor of Social Science Research, James Wright, to conduct an internal audit of the review process that led to the publication of Regnerus's findings in the New Family Structures Study.

Almost everybody who has commented on this debate has noted the oddity that the campaign was led by two Brits, Peter Brimelow of Forbes, who is now a U.S. citizen, and John O'Sullivan, editor of National Review, who is not.

WORRIES ABOUT THE MENTAL CAPACITY ACT GUIDE Dear Father Editor, Might I encourage a careful review of the «Practical Guide» to the Mental Capacity Act recently published by the Catholic Bishops» Conference through the CTS.

According to Kenneth Davids, Coffee Review's editor and lead taster, «We selected the top thirty coffees based on quality (represented by overall score), value (reflected by most affordable price per pound), and a ranking of other factors that include distinctiveness and uniqueness of style, certifications such as fair trade or organic, and general rarity.»

Expect all the latest dairy processing news, along with a review of the World Dairy Summit held last week in Rotterdam by our editor Suzanne Christiansen.

Our information was compiled and reviewed by Philip Anderson, a pharmacist and the editor of LactMed, the U.S. National Library of Medicine's drugs and lactation database.

Writing offered for posts will be reviewed by the editors and should meet the following criteria.

Editor's Note: This article was reviewed by Richard Olney, medical epidemiologist at the National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities.

Editor's note: This article was reviewed in by Fern R. Hauck, MD, MS, professor of family medicine and public health sciences at the University of Virginia.

As part of the pre-publication editorial process, this review has been commented on by two peers (an editor and referee who is external to the editorial team), a member of the Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's international panel of consumers and the Group's Statistical Adviser.

As part of the pre-publication editorial process, this review has been commented on by four peers (an editor and three referees who are external to the editorial team), a member of the Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's international panel of consumers and the Group's Statistical Adviser.

As part of the prepublication editorial process, this review has been commented on by two peers (an editor and referee who is external to the editorial team), a member of the Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's international panel of consumers and the Group's Statistical Adviser.

To ensure firms could take advantage of this additional research investment, the chancellor announced a review of intellectual property law, to be headed by former Financial Times editor Andrew Gowers.

The Liberal Democrat year's ups and down are reviewed by Stephen Tall, editor of LibDem Voice website.

The clashes over energy policies at PMQs were reviewed by BBC deputy political editor James Landale with Conservative MP Alan Duncan, Labour MP Vernon Coaker and Daily Politics presenter Andrew Neil.

ENDS Notes to Editors UK Alcohol duty context For a short video summary of the issues around alcohol pricing, please visit: https://vimeo.com/191959217 Following heavy lobbying from the alcohol industry, the last four Budgets have seen real terms cuts in alcohol duty Alcohol is 60 % more affordable than it was in 1980 — the alcohol duty escalator, introduced in 2008, which ensured that duty rose above inflation, helped mitigate this trend, but this progress has reversed since the duty escalator was scrapped in 2013 In real terms, spirits duty has halved, and wine duty fallen by a quarter since 1978 - 9 The Government estimates suggest that the duty cuts since 2013 will cost the Exchequer # 2.9 billion over four years The University of Sheffield estimated that an additional 6,500 people would be hospitalised each year as a result of the alcohol duty cuts in 2015 The report The report was peer reviewed by academic experts the fields of economics, public health and public policy prior to publication.

Notes to Editors The report, «How alcohol industry organisations mislead the public about alcohol and cancer», by Mark Petticrew, Nason Maani Hessari, Cécile Knai and Elisabete Weiderpass, will be published online in Drug and Alcohol Review at 22:00 6 September 2017 The Institute of Alcohol Studies is an independent institute bringing together evidence, policy and practice from home and abroad to promote and informed debate on alcohol's impact on society.

The clashes over women on the Conservative front bench which dominated PMQs are reviewed by the BBC's political editor and the Daily Politics panel.

The BBC's political editor reviewed PMQs» dominated by references to union boss Len McCluskey and Unite's role in picking Labour candidates bidding to become MPs.

The impact of the final PMQs before Parliament prorogues and the Queen's Speech are reviewed by the BBC's political editor and MPs.

The clashes over the number of women on the Conservative front bench which dominated PMQs were reviewed by the BBC's political editor and the Daily Politics panel.

The exchanges at PMQs between David Cameron and Harriet Harman are reviewed by the BBC political editor and MPs on the Daily Politics.

The two will appear in the campaign's only face - to - face debate, sponsored by the Times / Review Newsgroup, at Martha Clara Vineyards on Sound Avenue in Riverhead on Monday, Jan. 7 at 7 p.m. Doors open at 6:30 p.m. for the debate, which will be moderated by Times / Review executive editor Grant Parpan.

The editors in some journals rank the reviews themselves by the quality of their scholarship.

The new theoretical work has been recognized by Physical Review D editors as an Editors» Suggestion, a category reserved for «a small fraction of papers, which we judge to be particularly important, interesting, and well written.editors as an Editors» Suggestion, a category reserved for «a small fraction of papers, which we judge to be particularly important, interesting, and well written.Editors» Suggestion, a category reserved for «a small fraction of papers, which we judge to be particularly important, interesting, and well written.»

However, as an editor I am surrounded by the latest scientific breakthroughs in many areas, and there is a tremendous feeling of satisfaction in nurturing a paper from a study that has some weaknesses to one which gains strength through the review and editorial process.

That is why the editor of The Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry was puzzled by the reviews for manuscripts by one author — Hyung - In Moon, a medicinal - plant researcher then at Dongguk University in Gyeongju, South Korea.

What all these cases had in common was that researchers exploited vulnerabilities in the publishers» computerized systems to dupe editors into accepting manuscripts, often by doing their own reviews.

Most submitted papers are rated for suitability by members of Science's Board of Reviewing Editors.

The effort did not go to waste: the publication describing the achievement was distinguished by the editors of the journal Physical Review Letters.

The event initiated a dialogue on the topic in the community of peer - reviewed journal editors and led to guidelines on dealing with ghostwritten articles that are now embraced by many — though not all — scientific journals.

Reviews are currently only by invitation of the Editor.

Every funding item and personal profile submitted is reviewed by a team of COS editors, which ensures that the information is complete, properly formatted, and optimized.

«We reject something on the order of 90 % plus, and that's the same for Nature, Cell, and Science,» says Robert Shields, an editor at PLoS Biology, and editorial rejections — rejections by the editor without sending the manuscript out for review — make up the majority of those rejections.

Robert Garisto, an assistant editor at Physical Review Letters, says that his publication's efforts are complicated by the increasing specialization of physics subdisciplines, but are nevertheless yielding «some success.»

Only then does the peer review begin, and in this case the reviewers selected by the journal's editors will be publicly known.

A key contrast between reviews and research papers is that reviews tend to be commissioned (i.e., invited) by the editor rather than submitted like research papers.