Sentences with phrase «reviews come to the same conclusion»

Several reviews come to the same conclusion I do: The canopy should have a mesh window to allow for better airflow.

Not exact matches

The Obama administration's State Department conducted the same review two years ago and came to the opposite conclusion.
After reviewing, the task force has come to the same conclusion in its report, due to the principle that organic farming is an integrated system — starting with soil health.
The quick review of studies dating back to 1981 pretty much came to the same conclusion as Elle Woods, «Regular exercise can improve mood in people with mild to moderate depression.
Q: After thoroughly reading and reviewing about Russian women from your site, I've come to the conclusion that Russian women and American women are pretty much the same in their search for love and security.
Presumably the $ 10 additional fee is their service fee (ie, profit), but knowing what I know about the 50 - word «reviews» coming out of Kirkus Discoveries (that's $ 7 a word, in case you're calculating), I wonder if that publisher is coming to the same conclusion their authors are coming to — that paying $ 350 for a bad review kind of... sucks.
Yes, when I wrote my review of the M1 mortgage, I came to the same conclusion that the rates are simply too expensive.
Based on the text of the ICCER (Sir Muir Russell) report, the Review independently came to same conclusions I did — the emails weren't damning on their own, weren't necessarily reliable, and lacked sufficient context to justify the broad conclusions drawn by folks like Montford, McIntyre, McKitrick, et al..
Imagine if you will, someone like me arguing evidence for AGW coming to CFACT and citing an article from, not a top - tier journal, nor even a second - tier, but more like a third - tier journal like the Asia - Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences (which people generally publish in when they can't pass the more rigorous peer review of the more reputable journals), and if that paper were written by a person who's work has had to be corrected by others, not once, not twice, but FOUR times to my knowledge, and every correction takes it back in the opposite direction of what that person was arguing, and if the paper I was citing was this guy making the same old tired argument he's been corrected on before, and if this paper already had evidence of data tampering to get it's conclusions... just imagine the uproar from the usual crowd here.
There are, of course, a number of other reviews of the evidence that have come to the same conclusion, and none published by any credible organisation or journal that has come to the contrary conclusion.
Every peer - reviewed scientific study of the matter comes to the same conclusions
He also stated that in reviewing the cumulative evidence it was not unreasonable to come to the same conclusion, and affirmed the statements about the role of a Commissioner with the media.
Any person reviewing your resume may also come to the same conclusion.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z