Not exact matches
Lengthy and expensive
reviews that are «methodologically robust» but unusable in practice often fail to inform, inspire, or influence.55 A recent systematic
review of diabetes risk scores revealed that the authors of most studies were primarily concerned with the intellectual concept of improving the
predictive value of the score but had given little or no thought to how their score might be used, by whom, or for what — nor what the implications would be for real people who would be designated «at risk» by the score.56
«Indeed, even those litigation professionals who have experienced frustration with emerging eDiscovery technology promises — such as
predictive coding and other technology assisted
review applications — have found the
value of EDA.»
And Richard Sander's groundbreaking Stanford - Law -
Review article described how combined LSAT scores and undergraduate G.P.A.s have a
predictive value for bar exam performance of 35 percent.