Sentences with word «revocability»

So while the article in itself is probably revocable, «the Supreme Court interpretation is likely to be that Article 50 is non-revocable, and therefore any case for revocability is going to be a lot harder to make».

Following Sanchez - Graells» argument, it seems clear that requirements (ii) and (iii) of the CILFIT test are not fulfilled: Article 50 TEU has never been interpreted by the court, and the silence on revocability means that there is reasonable doubt as to its application.

On a related note, the potential revocability of the loan forgiveness eligibility letters strikes me as teeing up the mother of all promissory estoppel cases.

However, I would challenge Sanchez - Graells» statement that «it is inconceivable... to argue that the... (ir) revocability of a notice under (Article 50) is irrelevant for the adjudication of this case».

In the present proceedings in (R) Miller, I would argue that the UK Supreme Court is not under an obligation to refer the question of the revocability of a notice under Article 50 TEU to the Court of Justice of the European Union.

As an initial point, therefore, it could be argued that the question of revocability will not come up for determination before the Supreme Court as neither party will raise the argument.

Davis Polk's Intellectual Property and Technology lawyers give strategic advice to our clients with respect to IP and technology matters arising from their licensing, collaboration, research and development activities, including issues concerning the scope of their licenses, revocability and transferability of applicable agreements, the effect of corporate structure on such activities and bankruptcy - related issues affecting their IP rights under such agreements.

Article 50 litigation — UK Supreme Court rules on the limits of the prerogative and devolved powers The Dublin case — Brexit and the revocability of Article 50

On the issue regarding the revocability of the Article 50 withdrawal notice, according to the latest report capturing the views of 31 legal experts published by the NarusReport, a legal periodical, 74 % consider that the UK can unilaterally revoke the Article 50 notice.

If this is correct, then there is no need for the Supreme Court to refer a question to the CJEU as to the revocability of the Article 50 notification.

I share Francesco's doubts about the relevance of revocability.

Regardless of the terminology, it is the timing of the consent / surrender and its revocability that are important.