The vexing problem relating to the issue of the calculation of compensation payable to commercial agents on termination of their agency agreement has arisen once more in
the revolutionary judgment of the Court of Appeal in the case of Lonsdale v Howard & Hallam Limited [2006] EWCA Civ 63 made on 6 February 2006.
Not exact matches
But in para 99
of its
judgment the
court had laid down a principle which, if not
revolutionary, was novel and unsupported by authority:
[2] In 2003 and 2005 the plaintiffs obtained
judgments against the defendants, The Iranian Ministry of Information and Security («MIS»), the Islamic Republic of Iran («Iran») and The Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corp. (the «Revolutionary Guards»), in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (the «US Judgments
judgments against the defendants, The Iranian Ministry
of Information and Security («MIS»), the Islamic Republic
of Iran («Iran») and The Iranian
Revolutionary Guard Corp. (the «
Revolutionary Guards»), in the United States District
Court for the District
of Columbia (the «US
JudgmentsJudgments»).
On 10 December 2015, the General
Court of the European Union (GC) rendered a
judgment in the Council v. Front Polisario case that was
revolutionary in many regards: not only did a national liberalization movement successfully challenge an EU trade agreement, the
Court also considered the EU Charter
of Fundamental Rights (CFR) applicable to non-EU citizens on a non EU - territory and in the context
of trade policies (see previously, Geraldo Vidigal in EJILTalk).