Sentences with phrase «revolves around the science»

With that career behind him, Hardwick called his manager and said he wanted to work on programming that revolved around science, technology or pop culture — nothing else.
My career has revolved around science and people; and my parents had a great impact on influencing my choices.
Reading popular media, one might think the virtues of maker - centered learning revolve around science, math, engineering, and technology skills.
Units revolve around science and social studies topics.
Indeed, Otto maintains that «Americans find themselves in an absurd and dangerous position: in a time when the majority of the world's leading country's largest challenges revolve around science, few reporters are covering them from a scientific angle.»
And keep listening to Science Friday for this quote: «The world doesn't revolve around your science — it's about money!»
F.lux even took a stand for its own work, which revolves around the science of sleep.

Not exact matches

That ongoing debate revolves around whether the lack of women in high - growth entrepreneurship is partly attributable to the fact that only 18 percent of undergraduate computer science degrees are earned by women.
Historically speaking, every time the two have intersected, Science has come out as the winner (chariots pulling the sun across the sky, the Earth being flat, the Sun revolving around the Earth, etc.) To any of you who believe ID should be given equal time, please present even one single experiment that has * positively * indicated it.
A study done in 2005 by Dr. Jon D. Miller of Northwestern University, an expert in the public understanding of science and technology, found that one in five American adults thinks the Sun revolves around the Earth.
Although what he writes is open and unapologetic «heresy», at least Jack Mahoney has highlighted the fact that the question of science and religion is not some purely academic issue revolving around a few specialised philosophical and theological discussions.
God created science, as He created the universe Dimanchi... The Bible is very clear that the earth revolves around the sun.
remember, it was once «modern science» that proved the world was flat and the sun revolved around it.
11 - You believe in a book (New Testament) that was written 80 years after your Messiah died by men who never met him and who believed the earth was flat and the Sun revolved around the Earth, but continuously deny modern science books.
Science history; the sun revolves around the earth (wrong), the earth is flat (wrong), what goes up must come down (wrong).
So you still believe that epilepsy is caused by demon - possession, and that the sun revolves around the earth, regardless of what science says?
Every time the church has went against science (e.g., the earth revolves around the sun) science has won.
Just as those who wrote the Biblical texts had no concept of the science that would prove the earth actually revolves around the sun, so they had no concept of homosexuality (which wasn't defined until the 19th century.)
The questions we have treated in this book (such as whether nature has purpose; whether biology is reducible to physics and chemistry; whether and how chance comes into play in the cosmos; and now the epistemological question of how science relates to religion) revolve around the issue of whether our universe is one - dimensional or hierarchical.
Well, it comes from a 2000 year old book, contradicted by other 2000 year old books, no updates, can be interpreted in so many different ways depending on how the reader perceives his world (and how science has progressed... I'm sure if you were alive before galileo told you the earth did not revolve around the sun and had only the bible as your reference you would come to the same conclusion as the Vatican who said the sun revolved around the earth....
I forgot... the sun revolves around the earth (which is flat, by the way) and science and medicine are witchcraft.
Thus the issue of science and religion revolves very closely around the question of the legitimacy of hierarchical thinking.
You say that Science has disproved stories from the Bible, well Scientists once said that there was an edge of the world and you would fall off of it if you went to the edge... they said that the Earth was the center of the universe and that the sun revolved around us... You are all so quick to throw out Christianity because you think 1 story doesn't make sense to you and couldn't have happened how it says in the Bible, yet so willing to follow scientists that constantly revise their theories and change what you inevitably believe.
The history of science provides many examples of this combination of analogy and innovation in the creation of models which were useful in generating theories.4 The «Bohr model» of the atom, in which «planetary» electrons revolve in orbits around a central nucleus, resembles the solar system in certain of its dynamical properties; but the key assumption of quantum jumps between orbits had no classical parallel at all.
One protester's sign quipped «Science: running everything since 1543,» a reference to Nicolaus Copernicus's treatise that year arguing our planet revolves around the sun, instead of the other way.
William Shakespeare may well have been more aware of his era's science — including the Copernican view that the planets revolve around the sun — than has generally been thought
Many people erroneously believe that the dark ages were caused by the Catholic Church and its hatred of science / love of superstition, and its dominant The liturgical life of the Catholic Church revolves around the Eucharistic sacrifice and the sacraments.
Autómata is yet another film that would be considered a science - fiction film revolving around a dystopian future.
There actually is a story (savvy science fiction addicts have compared it to the similarly - premised 1951 short story, «The Marching Morons», by Cyril Kornbluth) within the film, revolving around an average - intellect military librarian named Joe (average Joe, get it?)
With just three actors, minimal special effects, and few locations, McDowell creates a bizarre science - fiction universe that revolves around a mysterious break in the space - time continuum.
The four - week program revolves around the development of literary, math and science skills through the FIRST Robotics Camp, and a Solar Car Building Experience.
And, all Achieve3000 lessons revolve around topics in science, social studies, arts, humanities, careers, and current events, ensuring that students in English language arts build discipline specific and cross-disciplinary vocabulary in every lesson.
Her research interests revolve around the intersection between the literacies and texts youth are asked to learn in the disciplines (particularly in science and social studies) and the literacies and texts they experience outside of school.
And, all Achieve3000 lessons revolve around topics in Science and Social Studies, ensuring that Spanish - speaking students build discipline - specific and academic vocabulary across all subjects.
The most important element of the game is the system of fifteen abilities, most of which are focused on different fields (e.g. history, science, occult) and talents revolving around interpersonal relations.
The first pack is called «Science Friction» and revolves around Hulk's story line with six different episodes available.
The salon style evening started out with wine and light bites, followed by the conversation style discussion on the subjects of science, culture, media, sexism in science, and a host of other interesting topics that were explored revolving around the theme of the event.
Session topics revolved around the six Grand Science Challenges of the WCRP and addressed the specific need for, and role of, climate observations from space.
Barnes wrote: «However, much of climate science revolves around data that are more rough stones than potential gold nuggets.»
It was just a comment and it does seem that much of the debate about this topic revolves around «philosophical arguments» or discussions that appear rather pedantic about some terminology, rather than actually discussing the science (not that philosophy and terminology aren't relevant, just that you don't prove that some science is wrong by simply quoting Popper — not that you did this though).
Wotts — It was just a comment and it does seem that much of the debate about this topic revolves around «philosophical arguments» or discussions that appear rather pedantic about some terminology, rather than actually discussing the science (not that philosophy and terminology aren't relevant, just that you don't prove that some science is wrong by simply quoting Popper — not that you did this though).
A career in the field revolves around ensuring the safety and efficacy of medicines, and usually requires a life sciences degree with a Masters or PhD.
As a fresh graduate who's looking for a job in biomedical science, you want your resume to revolve around your academic accomplishments.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z