Sentences with phrase «rhetorical excesses»
The phrase "rhetorical excesses" refers to using exaggerated or extravagant language to make a point in communication. It means going overboard by being overly dramatic or using excessive words or expressions to emphasize a message. Full definition
Rhetorical excess seems to have stunted Mr. Reynold's ability to do basic math here.
hudsonvalleyone.com
The first anniversary of Eric Garner's death on Staten Island arrives next week, an event sure to be accompanied by rhetorical excess and unwise policy...
Of course, such rhetorical excess limits the ability of Professor Quiggin to denounce the rhetorical flourishes of others.
None of us is immune to the temptation of rhetorical excess: we all, at one time or another, say more or other than what we precisely mean.
To cover all this in just over two hundred pages, Hibbs leans more on tortured judgments and rhetorical excesses (e.g., a chapter entitled «Seinfeld's Dark God») than argument, in the end coming across as someone who needs to kick back and pop in a video.
The fifth floor will delight fans of the biennials, while for others it will be a reminder of the rhetorical excesses of the past.
Though he is willing to admit to «rhetorical excess,» Roberts is not really taking back what he said about crimes and trials.
Hoping that my colleagues of RealClimate will find real questions and no rhetorical excess in my proposition and looking forward to reading your comments.
Campbell concluded that «neither side in this case has any monopoly over incivility or rhetorical excess.»
Some of the problems in the trial arise from his overreaction to Mr. Groia's needling and rhetorical excess.»
The OSC's application was heard by Superior Court Justice Archie Campbell, who dismissed it and said neither side in the case had «any monopoly over incivility or rhetorical excess.»
He was accused of being strident and sarcastic, rude to the lawyer for the Ontario Securities Commission, and prone to «rhetorical excess» and «petulant invective.»
Samsung's lawyers accuse their colleagues working for Apple of «rhetorical excess» because they «repeatedly incant [ed] broad, vague design concepts» such as «the iPhone's innovative look» rather than properly portray the narrow scope of the three design patents - in - suit.
The underlying philosophy behind the institute's existence is that every argument can be enhanced by obtaining savvy feedback; that even the most silver - tongued lawyer is not immune to rhetorical excess or developing a tin ear when Supreme Court judges commence probing and challenging.