Sentences with phrase «rhetorical questions so»

I count nine rhetorical questions so far, and I'm not stopping anytime soon.

Not exact matches

Generally speaking, the answers are obvious, so to anyone with a modicum of discernment and common sense, the questions are rhetorical.

The answer to this question can not be found, as is so often claimed, in the inadequacies of the preacher so far as his rhetorical skill, his use of apt illustrations, his logical development of theme, and so forth are in view.

So I suppose I'll happily leave my question as rhetorical.

So of course your question about children's toys is rhetorical and therefore doesn't need answering.

The answers to these rhetorical questions are of course that Jesus IS who he said He is and that these intelligent men that could read and write believed it so passionately that they were willing to die for it.

Often this tension was felt to have been so painful that one or another heretic sought to suppress either the Hebrew or the Hellenic element, as with the efforts of the second «century Marcion to get the Church to excise the Old Testament from the Christian Bible, or, from the opposite side, the sneering rhetorical question from the puritanical pen of the early «third «century Tertullian, «What has Athens to do with Jerusalem?»

So when Jesus says that we must be born of Water and Spirit, and if you believe and are baptized you will be saved, I agree with you that in a strict sense God does the saving and we need only immerse (baptize) ourselves in the grace he offers us, I believe that the statement Jesus made about marriage to be applicable, «Therefore what God has joined together, no human being must separate» and echo Peter's rhetorical question, «Can anyone keep these people from being baptized with water?

That's what I call a rhetorical question, so just add a couple of tablespoons of cocoa powder if you agree (and you do..

so many rhetorical questions!

So in answer to your rhetorical question the world doesn't ALWAYS need another fashion blog but it definitely needs yours.

Occasionally you'll lob in a question, but then her answer will spark a funny memory so you find yourself off again on a rhetorical mission.

That's a rhetorical question, but the answer is «so great.»

It's the small, black comic cut - aways that fall flat; the straight - to - camera rhetorical questions and open - ended sentences that Wes Anderson and Todd Solondz do so well.

Rhetorical questions are also a great way to help them assess and evaluate the problem so that they can make the schematic connection.

Last week, GoodeReader posed a rhetorical question, essentially asking why so many individuals and organizations have voiced their opinions in favor of Apple and several publishers who have been accused of colluding on ebook prices in order to drive consumer traffic away from Amazon.

That's a rhetorical question, by the way, so you can stop putting on the costume.

The question is — inevitably, perpetually — a rhetorical one; in part because so many alternatives to the white cube already exist.

Well, that just throws up so many questions; but I'll merely say that looking at a great deal of old figurative painting, from Giotto to Matisse, seems a lot more real and a lot less rhetorical than the experience of looking at Stella, particularly if you define «rhetorical» as something designed to have a persuasive or impressive effect, but which lacks meaningful content.

She asks the rhetorical question (I paraphrase), Why do we still go to conferences when there are so many media to bring them to us.

Another question (actual question, not rhetorical) is: If you had two ARGO floats connected by a rigid 10 meter pole so that they would have to travel together, up, down, and sideways, and the pair traveled the ocean doing the normal ARGO mission, would the data from the two buoys track within + / - 0.005 C?

Rhetorical questions can be quite powerful in political speeches or philosophical debates, but don't work so well in scientific discussions.

I am not an expert in this subject so I am asking genuine questions, not rhetorical, of you who is one of the world experts on this.

The larger (and more important) rhetorical pattern, though, is projection: denialism begins and ends with bad arguments and unsupported conclusions that are never, ever withdrawn or questioned — so mainstream scientists must be accused of dogmatism and closed minds.

Again, this raises the not - too - rhetorical question of what changed in the laws of nature governing reality in common law Canada — at least reality as it exists outside of the National Capital Region and the boundaries of the various provincial and territorial legislatures — so that the but - for test was now almost Ivory Snow level workable?

That's a rhetorical question because it seems to me obvious, as an experienced litigant who also could not find counsel — to so much as give me the time of day — that the point is to celebrate every example of self - represented litigants who are indeed pursuing frivolous claims in order to promote the idea that many, if not most, self - represented litigants deserve the same disparagement.

Rhetorical question, of course you do, so download the Gboard keyboard.

That's a rhetorical question of course because we all know the answer is that it would be a losing battle, so better to make the real estate industry the scapegoat.