Not exact matches
Mostly poor West African
nations may be responsible for the growth of cocoa, but it's mostly people in
rich countries
consuming it.
But the true battle
consuming leaders from 198 governments at a U.N. global warming conference that concluded yesterday after two weeks of negotiations and 32 hours of overtime debating was really about just one thing: balancing responsibilities between poor,
rich and
richer nations.
She rightly suspected that wanting and
consuming, as
rich nations do, don't necessarily lead to happiness.
The U.S. with 4.5 % of the global population can not continue to
consume roughly a quarter of Earth's resources; similar statements apply to the other
rich nations.
Perhaps Blomqvist — or anyone at the Breakthrough Institute — could explain why they think that
rich, high -
consuming nations (like the US, for instance) need to keep growing their GDP (forever?)
But a new report confirms that this is an accounting illusion - with more emissions being «exported» to developing countries, who increasingly make the goods
consumed by the
richer nations.
And when increasing GDP is unquestionably equated with progress and development — as has become the case in many
nations both
rich and poor — it simply feeds into the cult of more, which is at the root of humanity
consuming on average 1.5 planet's worth of resources, and five Earth's resources in the US.
Many commentators argue that focusing on where emissions are produced is unfair, because much of the carbon output of countries such as China are generated as a result of producing goods that are ultimately
consumed in
richer nations.
People in the poorer
nations argue that the average person in the
rich countries eats more food,
consumes more energy and poisons the air more than they do.