Sentences with phrase «rich owner nasser»

Each unit will unique to each rich owner's specification and will even receive a new VIN number.

I was out this week talking to friends mate and people, and I said god this country in a mess, and a bloke said yes Manchester Unite are broke, another said we need a new rich owner, and you think people are worried about the economy most do not even know we are in trouble

Face facts, we can't compete financially with the mega clubs unless and until a mega rich owner comes in.

We are at the next level and unless we are bought by an incredibly rich owner like Usmanov our hope is that we are smarter than the top sides and pick top talent before they can demand the sort of moneySanchez has.

This is a decent article, yet the negatives from fans are still there, I would love to see arsenal like I did at the end of the 90's and at the beggining of the 2nd millennium but it doesn't mean in order to do so I would buy all the best players in world, I would get a rich owner to put his filthy money in, change the manager every 2 years to do so, there's so much wrong in football nowadays that yes it's still a sport but there's more focus on the filthy amounts of money being spent on clubs and players that I think attracts more attention than the game itself, now that is wrong and it's very wrong, even our owner though not like the arabs or Russians, yet the yank is clueless about the tradition of our game, it's just sad, so the fact that Wenger has remained for this long through all these changes that have occurred whilst the money game has elvolved, it makes me happy that arsenal do not spend stupid amounts of money on players, we don't try and buy the league, hell we even tight with wages and transfer fees, I'm glad it's like that, though our season ticket is a rip off I still don't mind it because at least we are not like the other supreme teams, there's a bit of tradition left at our club, yet you go to man shitty or Chelski, there is no tradition, it's all about buying ur way all the way to the top, on the other hand spuds don't know what to make of them besides how the heck have they finished above us?

In it their mega rich owner Nasser Al - Khelaifi spoke about a few of his key players and declared that they would all be staying put.

I think fans like u are those gold digging fans that want us to get a rich owner lile city or Chelsea cuz it guarantee wins right?

I know some of you said one rich owner is like any other, but in Dein's case that's not true.

Kroenke has told us that his aims are not the same as us fans, will we continue to spend our very hard earned cash to line the pockets of a very rich owner who does not want to win championships.

If we had a rich owner who was happy to put more money in the club things would be different but Kroenke only takes money out he doesn't put any in (or so it seems).

So the question is, why would a cash rich owner be selling the best players?

He went on to say, «The way things are going even Mr. Burns is thinking of becoming a Democrat,» a reference to the rich owner of the power plant where Homer Simpson works.

Protectionism, for example, not only tends to damage efficiency but redistributes wealth from consumers to rich owners and workers whose wages are well above average.

So it's not just rich owners now with psg we are actually competing against funding from a wealthy country!

Whenever we seem to have money some club get rich owners and ruin the transfer for us.

«New cash rich owners of inter milan sell their top goalscorer» does not somehow have the ring of truth about it.

Maybe that is why our manager has bemoaned these mega rich owners who have changed the face of football in recent years, leading to this previously unthinkable Neymar transfer.

Manchester United transfer news round up: Reds to sign Arsenal target in double Bayern raid, # 65m defensive duo linked & more Premier League's richest owners: Arsenal, Chelsea, Liverpool and Manchester United's billionaire masters revealed

This way, the rich owners of Arsenal supporters group will sell their shares to every fan who wants to own a piece.

At a time when clubs like Chelsea and Manchester City received huge financial backing from rich owners, Arsenal instead chose to invest in their long - term future by building the 60,000 - seater Emirates Stadium; a project of immense cost, which severely hit Arsenal's short - term financial capabilities.

The changing of the FFP rules by Uefa which will once again allow mega rich owners to pump shedloads of cash at their club could be disastrous for the Gunners, as our own man at the top Stan Kroenke has proved himself reluctant to spend a single cent of his own money on Arsenal.

The only reason why Man City and Chelsea have won the league recently and been doing slightly better than Arsenal, is because they have super rich owners who have pumped bottomless pits of money into their clubs.

Whether that will undermine Arsenal so much that kroenke decides to sell is uncertain, but it will probably mean the shackles are off again and unrestricted investment by rich owners could once again become the norm for the biggest teams.

and who seriously refuses these rich owners?

SEE MORE Manchester United transfer news Liverpool transfer rumours Premier League's richest owners: Arsenal, Chelsea, Liverpool and Manchester United's billionaire masters revealed

Mutually assured destruction as rich owners give up the thrill of the chase.

I am happy to bash SS and IG but the stadium was suppose to allow AFC to earn enough to compete but then money rich owners started buying clubs and changed the playing field after AFC had committed to the stadium.

Take your pick of the above but the reality is City and Chelsea are ambitious, aren't run as proper businesses and with the relaxing of the financial fair play rules spend monies thanks to their mega rich owners.

Aston Villa, Portsmouth, Blackburn... these are all clubs, big clubs, that tried the spendthrift approach, then spiraled into mediocrity and irrelevance due to those policies when the rich owners lost interest.

Any reliable article in the media would explain that inter has new cash rich owners who will be putting money in to the club and how selling icardi fits in to this new financial situation.

Having cash rich owners does not mean they will be throwing around money like what Abramovic and the Abu Dabi group do.

There are many clubs which have been brought to their knees by rich owners.

And that has allowed rich owners to splash the cash — hindering Arsenal who Wenger insists have stuck to the letter of the law by operating within their means.

Truth is, we act like porpers (at least Wenger does) whilst having 2 of the richest owners in football and a cash pile that devalues each season as inflation in football increases (another Wengerism, economist my ass).

In any case, football has never been totally fair — for as long as it's been a professional sport there have been rich and not so rich owners of clubs.

Lerner has abdicated but but he has still given Lambert as much money to spend as all but the mega rich owners.

But in the summer of 2012, the club again went on a mass spending spree backed by their rich owners from Qatar, and the arrivals of Zlatan Ibrahimovic and Ezequiel Lavezzi meant that Gameiro dropped down to merely a backup player at the club.

Ambitious rich owners.

You can argue that we've pushed above our weight over the past couple of seasons, matching teams with limitless resources, Chelsea and City with their rich owners and United with their wealth in the commercial side of things.

I mean, we have the 3rd richest owner in the Premier League!

Problem two: The Hyundai Excel was not particularly reliable, a problem exacerbated by the owners: Rich owners can afford frequent oil changes, regular dealer service, and to replace beat - up body panels.

If you can't wait for Aston Martin's new hypercar - not due until 2018 - and you happen to be one of the 24 stupidly rich owners of the company's track - only Vulcan, there is a solution.

Impossibly rich owners will also benefit from a new sound system that allows those in the front to listen to different music to those in the rear.

And Waggs to Riches owner Kim Curler emphasized she used Fletcher Creek only one time and no longer buys puppies from the kennel.

Formerly a traditional manor house owned by the man who discovered the islands, Joao Goncalves Zarco, it now features exhibits of various antiques, paintings and jewellery that belonged to the rich owners who lived there from the 15th to the 19th Century.

A foot of sea - level rise is very unlikely to hurt many poor people, though it might inconvenience a few rich owners of beach - front luxury homes.

Smith said the proposed change in the workers» comp law was intended to benefit «rich owners» at the expense of the athletes «who do all the work.»

Not exact matches

The legislation reduces levies on owners of small businesses, while also cutting income tax rates for the richest Americans to 37 percent from 39.6 percent.

«First, domaining is not a get - rich - quick scheme,» says John Motson, author of the e-book, Domaining Manifesto, proprietor of industry blog DNXpert.com, and owner of more than 1,000 domains, including a few valued at more than $ 100,000.

That bid ultimately lost out to a rival proposition by a group led by Senators owner — and yet another Rich 100 member — Eugene Melnyk (No. 79).