Why would an atheist want to believe in God, because if they did, they would have to change their lifestyle and they don't want to do that — that would take away what they consider, their freedom to do anything they choose not to mention the fun they get out of
ridiculing believers.
I don't like how some atheists
ridicule believers, because they have faith in something or someone that can't be proven — that's what faith is all about, and I know that.
Atheists
ridicule believers, rather than tolerating them.
Why are the foaming - at the mouth angry atheists coming out of woodworks to bash and mock and
ridicule believers?
Using select verses of the Scripture as slingshot ammunition in vain attempts to
ridicule believers is juvenile.
Not exact matches
Ridicule Gary and other
believers in mythical gods?
It's arrogance to consider yourself a better person than, say, a
believer, and that you have the right to
ridicule them.
There is much that could be said about this, but I will stick with one thing, based on discussion at about the 2 minute mark: When atheists insist that atheism does not drive behavior, and then then campaign on behalf of atheism,
ridicule religion and religious
believers in the name of atheism, seek to change laws in favor of their atheistic positions, recommend the extermination of religion, and practice falsehoods like Dawkins's in support of atheism, they prove that their atheism drives their behavior and that their premise is false, disingenuous, and (as far as I can tell) useless for anything but giving atheism rhetorical cover from being implicated in atheists» atrocities.
believers of God are
ridiculed by the «rational» «free thinking» atheist for choosing # 2, while they are at peace with their highly «intellectual» conclusion of option # 1.
Not only do they not believe in a God, and sit here and
ridicule everyone that don't sgree with them, but the same God they don't believe in, is the first thing they will throw out at a
believer, who gets some righteous anger towards thier folly?
The ridiculous part of your argument is why are you atheists and Satanists so determined to hunt down
believers to call them names and
ridicule their beliefs?
Your constant
ridicule of God and
believers should make you wonder why if there is no possibility of God must you fight so hard against it.
I agree with @Luke in his post as far as peer pressure, and potentially opening yourself to abuse and
ridicule by «
believers» should you not comply.
After I read the article by Evans, it occurred to me that perhaps one of the many reasons that there is so much hate,
ridicule and criticism generated by Satan and spewed by the non-
believers on this forum is because in a small way they can witness the hope and peace of mind that
believers have and for some reason they resent those that have that which they do not have, as did Evan's mother had for his father after he had accepted Jesus as his Lord and King and Savior.
Out of all the postings on this site today, I found «Derp's «post the most fascinating and informative, as well as deeply revealing.Even after boasting of what seems to be a practically perfect live by any measure, he informs us that he takes pleasure in mocking and
ridiculing those of faith who are presumably his opposite; I can only wonder if, given all his supposed accomplishments, he is smart enough to realize how deeply revealing of his true character his remarks are.As a
believer, I rarely engage in arguments with my atheist friends, and like to think I wouldn't lower myself to the level of juvenile name - calling and personal attacks against whatever my atheist friends hold dear.Most of the time we simply agree to disagree; when they hold forth with misinformation or ignorance on their assumed «knowledge «of my faith, I try to gently correct them; I certainly don't allow any disagreements we have to devolve into hateful insults and name - calling.
In fact, quite the reverse of what you suggest is true; i.e., the situation today is that many scientists ARE
believers, but they dare not «come out of the closet» for fear of being
ridiculed and / or losing government and / or academic grants.
I think that an honest answer is «yes,» some of us known the discrimination that is practiced by
believer upon non-believers, the
ridicule.
The difference is that most
believers are not compelled to force others to believe as they do, however non-
believers feel strongly compelled to
ridicule and try to convince
believers that their beliefs are unfounded.
CC «The difference is that most
believers are not compelled to force others to believe as they do, however non-
believers feel strongly compelled to
ridicule and try to convince
believers that their beliefs are unfounded...» ---- Oh, of course.
Yet when religions talk about alternate states of being and planes of existence, they are
ridiculed by
believers in «science.»
They are so bold and so brave in attacking and mocking and
ridiculing Christian
believers and Christian scripture and Christian doctrine Christian diety.
Delusional people should be called out and, since they are the majority in the US, laughed at and
ridiculed the same as I would do to flat Earthers, astrolgers, horiscope
believers, etc..
The fact is, that last decade's crop of «new» atheists (not so new any more now, some of them dead), have sent our their adherents to go specifically go out and be rude,
ridicule any and all
believers in some kind of God / god, and spare no rhetoric.
There's only a handful of atheists who are continually
ridiculed by the majority of
believers.
And
believers in God don't constantly
ridicule your stew pid balogna day after day, do we?
If you are a non-
believer or a
believer in the occult or some other belief that I do not believe in and I do not deride or
ridicule you for your belief or non-belief and do not try to disallow your expression of such, why do you feel it is appropriate to make comments about my belief or the expression thereof and feel my belief should be restricted?
Believers have been
ridiculed for millennia, no biggie.
[The communist regime confiscated religious property,
ridiculed religion, harassed
believers, and propagated atheism in schools.
But they never see themselves being hateful when they mock,
ridicule and belittle
believers, calling them all kinds of derogatory names, even using profanities.
You said, «Why do you deluded masses call atheists «angry»» My guess is that the emotion
believers feel when atheists question, or
ridicule their silly beliefs, is very similar to what they feel when someone is angry at them while they think they did nothing wrong.
I know others have been
ridiculed, shamed, or judged for choosing to breastfeed, formula - feed, or «option C.» I am a firm
believer that «fed is best,» and for me, that meant exclusively pumping.
If you're speaking with someone who is a
believer, there might be a common reference point of
ridicule, which is a nice avenue to open up a conversation.
Steve has been studiously non-political throughout this controversy, but it could be he's being drawn into an ideological war between the true
believers at UWA and those who are trying to verify what looks like abuse of psychological methods to
ridicule and defame people who are not
believers.
The Post and other «true
believers» ignore or
ridicule a growing body of evidence rebutting their beliefs.