Sentences with phrase «ridiculous assertion of»
Oddly, what looks like intelligence to some people looks like an entirely ridiculous assertion of opinion without any evidence, reason, or evident perspective to back it up.
http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/ Not exact matches
The worst kinds of false news aren't even the most obvious kinds — the clear fakes or ridiculous assertions — the Microsoft researcher and former fellow at Harvard's Berkman Center says:
Probably the best examples are the ridiculous assertions by various companies, including General Electric, that «the quality of our earnings is supported by our cash flow», and that «Cash is cash.
Interestingly, though, Myerson's ridiculous assertion in a roundabout way shows how you change culture... In this case, Nadella effectively shunted Windows to its own division with all of the company's other non-strategic assets, leaving Myerson and team to come to yesterday's decision on their own.
He's just refuting the ridiculous assertions by some creationists to refute clear evidence of evolutionary theory, or suggest that the Earth is only 6,000 years old.
The ridiculous assertion that because Christians follow their religion they are somehow outside of basic human rights is absolutely criminal... We are doomed if what you three have posted becomes the common belief.
So many things which once had distressed or revolted him — the speeches and pronouncements of the learned, their assertions and their prohibitions, their refusal to allow the universe to move — all seemed to him now merely ridiculous, non-existent, compared with the majestic reality, the flood of energy, which now revealed itself to him: omnipresent, unalterable in its truth, relentless in its development, untouchable in its serenity, maternal and unfailing in its protectiveness.
The type of atheists, like most on this post, that continue with the ridiculous assertion that there can be nothing greater than us that exists above or outside of our little physical realm, are simply either intellectually stunted individuals, or more likely, bitter people who have gotten their panties in a bunch because some religious text contains some apparent condemnation of their lifestyle.
Ironically, the only books I am aware of that makes ridiculous assertions about the origin of life popping into existence are the Torah and it's derivatives, the Bible and Qu» ran.
You may wonder how it is possible for a person like myself to find these sorts of assertions ridiculous.
Your assertion of hypocrisy is ridiculous, and borne of complete ignorance.
One of the book's more ridiculous assertions is that the so - called Sangreal documents, held by the Priory of Sion, include «the legendary «Q» Document,» which «even the Vatican admits... exists.»
In any case how can we be sure that the people who make such outrageous assertions are, indeed Arsenal supporters when many of them often use ridiculous names?
When I asked Malliotakis about that allegation today she responded with a mashup of replies, first saying that she would «stay on topic today,» then dismissing Dietl's assertion as «outrageous» and «ridiculous» and ending by saying «there's no comment on that... it's frivolous» as her staffer moved to end the press conference.
It should have been taking decisive action but engaged instead in systematic understatement of the danger: it has made ridiculous assertions that the U.S. should not do anything that China does not agree to do and has stubbornly insisted that no action should be taken to improve climate change «if it hurts the economy.»
American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten bashed the report, huffing that it's full of «ridiculous assertions» says,
She promptly bashed the report, insisting that it's full of «ridiculous assertions» and countered with half - truths and threw in a little class warfare as red meat for her members:
This is actually one of the most ridiculous assertions when it comes to Skyward Sword.
This is a ridiculous graph that ignores the stop / start nature of technological progress and adoption and falls in the arena of pure assertion (e.g.there ought to be major spikes corresponding to the widespread postwar adoption of automobiles, etc.) This was discussed with Pratt some time ago and any conclusions based on it are indefensible imaginings.
Such grants have brought us «studies» connecting «dangerous manmade global warming» to dwindling frog populations, shrinking Italian pasta supplies, clownfish getting lost, cockroaches migrating, and scores of other remote to ridiculous assertions.
We don't get any closer to science by denying the significant possibility that we are causing significantly adverse changes in climate than we do by the ridiculous assertion that we understand the chaotic complexity of climate well enough to say with certainty how many parts per millions of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere will lead to how many degrees of global warming.
His opposition stemmed partly from the valid argument that they impose real hardship on Iranians, but also from the very dubious claim that they make war more likely, and from the legally ridiculous assertion that western use of financial tools to block oil sales «is a financial blockade, and blockades are acts of war.»
I'll leave readers to ponder which of these assertions is the more patently ridiculous, but NASA's Gavin Schmidt's comments at RealClimate do shed some light on the former one.
joeldshore makes a ridiculous assertion when he claims the rate of rise in atmospheric CO2 has doubled from 1 to 2 ppm «over the last 40 years».
What I found so terribly ridiculous was the assertion (such as in the headline) that the point of FOI requests was to bog down researchers to delay their future publications.
He / she / they are doing this by posting ridiculous assertions (including untrue paraphrases that grossly distort the words of others) and by changing the subject whenever the daft nature of the assertions is pointed out.
Despite delusions of grandeur [«Steven Mosher is to Climategate what Woodward and Bernstein were to Watergate»] and ridiculous assertions [«He was just the right person, with just the right influence, and just the right expertise to be at the heart of the promulgation of the files»] Mr. Mosher was nothing more than a temporary go - between that he used to inflate his importance in the matter.
LolWot successfully explains why the Moshers, Currys and Fullers of this world are ridiculous: the assertions they make are blatantly internally inconsistent and self - contradictory.
They knew much of the landscape of uncertainty and they went ahead and said 95 % surety when any scientist or even layman with a modicum of interest in the subject could see that was completely ridiculous assertion.
Given all that, I would assert that solving the inverse scattering problem of this epic proportions is impossible, and the assertion that it is «not particularly difficult» is simply ridiculous.
Point taken, but not because any part of it [Trenberth's assertion] requires proof of being ridiculous.
The issue is so polarized, it has come to ridiculous black - and - white assertions from supporters of both sides.
Ultimatley defending the credibility of the report by reference to the actual report's assertion that it is credible is ridiculous.
Interestingly, though, Myerson's ridiculous assertion in a roundabout way shows how you change culture... In this case, Nadella effectively shunted Windows to its own division with all of the company's other non-strategic assets, leaving Myerson and team to come to yesterday's decision on their own.