He's just refuting
the ridiculous assertions by some creationists to refute clear evidence of evolutionary theory, or suggest that the Earth is only 6,000 years old.
Probably the best examples are
the ridiculous assertions by various companies, including General Electric, that «the quality of our earnings is supported by our cash flow», and that «Cash is cash.
But then, newspapers have often been more than happy to print
ridiculous assertions by their favorite politicians, so that's not really anything new.
Not exact matches
One of the book's more
ridiculous assertions is that the so - called Sangreal documents, held
by the Priory of Sion, include «the legendary «Q» Document,» which «even the Vatican admits... exists.»
... much like your
ridiculous assertions on a return man being as good a CB as Lattimore based on his AV, which was the inflated
by his return stats.
When I asked Malliotakis about that allegation today she responded with a mashup of replies, first saying that she would «stay on topic today,» then dismissing Dietl's
assertion as «outrageous» and «
ridiculous» and ending
by saying «there's no comment on that... it's frivolous» as her staffer moved to end the press conference.
We don't get any closer to science
by denying the significant possibility that we are causing significantly adverse changes in climate than we do
by the
ridiculous assertion that we understand the chaotic complexity of climate well enough to say with certainty how many parts per millions of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere will lead to how many degrees of global warming.
He / she / they are doing this
by posting
ridiculous assertions (including untrue paraphrases that grossly distort the words of others) and
by changing the subject whenever the daft nature of the
assertions is pointed out.
Ultimatley defending the credibility of the report
by reference to the actual report's
assertion that it is credible is
ridiculous.