The religious
right are in the courts fightnig to cotrol women's reproductive rights, keep their pastors out of jail for se x ual misconduct, and for misappropriation of funds.
The religious
right are in the courts fighting for control over women's reproductive rights, defending their pastors for illicit se x ual indiscretion and misappropriation of funds.
The religious
right are in the courts fighting for 1) control over women's reproductive rights.
Not exact matches
As such, the
court reasoned that they «fall well - within» the common definition of commodity as well as the CEA's broad definition of commodity, which includes «all other goods and articles... and all services,
rights, and interests...
in which contracts for future delivery
are presently or
in the future dealt
in.»
As politicians and businesses fight it out
in court over aquifer
rights, towns
are drying up.
And last year, the E.U.'s top
court has ordered it to allow a «
right to
be forgotten»
in its searches.
A lawyer representing Schrems, James Doherty, told the
court that a referral to the European Court was «unnecessary or at least premature» as the Irish regulator had not fully investigated the complaint and had not used all tools in its power to restrict data flows where consumers» rights were threat
court that a referral to the European
Court was «unnecessary or at least premature» as the Irish regulator had not fully investigated the complaint and had not used all tools in its power to restrict data flows where consumers» rights were threat
Court was «unnecessary or at least premature» as the Irish regulator had not fully investigated the complaint and had not used all tools
in its power to restrict data flows where consumers»
rights were threatened.
«A ruling by a single judge
in one circuit can not and does not undo the years of clear legal precedent nationwide establishing that transgender students have the
right to go to school without
being singled out for discrimination,» said a statement from five groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), that have filed «friend of the
court» briefs on behalf of transgender students.
In last June's 5 - to - 4 Hobby Lobby ruling, which
was divided along ideological lines, the high
court said closely held companies have a
right to special religious exceptions when it comes to the benefits they
're required to offer their employees under the ACA.
Although Thiel implies
in his essay that the Gawker story about Hogan's sex tape would not have
been published by any
right - thinking journalistic outlet, and that the First Amendment doesn't and shouldn't protect such behavior, two higher -
court judges ruled before the Hogan decision that the Gawker piece
was clearly covered by the Constitution's free - speech protections.
The findings of racially motivated mapmaking satisfied Democrats and minority
rights groups, who
are now pushing a separate federal
court in Texas to determine that the voter ID law
was also crafted with discriminatory intent.
Uber (uber) will defend its
right to operate
in London
in a
court hearing on Monday after the app
was deemed unfit to run a taxi service and stripped of its license
in its most important European market.
In addition,
courts (though not human -
rights tribunals)
are raising the burden of proof for mental injury, which will likely limit the number of claims.
A
right to use a portion of a public good for private gain — the private gain part
is a key element
in the consideration and also
in how a
court would look at the transaction.
Dale, also a lawyer, fought this
in court too, but an Ontario judge ruled that TREB
was within its
rights.
«The patent system
is based on a «bargain,» or quid pro quo: the inventor
is granted exclusive
rights in a new and useful invention for a limited period
in exchange for disclosure of the invention so that society can benefit from this knowledge,» the
court said.
Its public relations machine seemed to run completely off the rails
in May, when the European
Court of Justice enshrined the «
right to
be forgotten» — a concept Google had said amounted to censorship and which it had fought to undermine.
The company
was stunned
in May when a
court said it would have to accept Europeans» «
right to
be forgotten» online and field their requests to delete links to personal information
in search results.
Abortion
was legalized
in the United States
in 1973, when the Supreme
Court declared that a woman's constitutional
right to privacy protected her decision to end a pregnancy.
The law, known as Senate Bill 4,
is slated to take effect Sept. 1, but has
been challenged
in court by
rights organizations and localities that say the law infringes on local governments» constitutional
rights, and will sow fear through immigrant communities by dissuading people from reporting crimes or testifying as witnesses out of fear they will
be deported.
Davis sought Supreme
Court review after the 11th U.S. Circuit
Court of Appeals ruled
in May that the failure to obtain a warrant did not violate Davis»
right to
be free from unreasonable searches and seizures under the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
Supporters say Americans have the
right to take complaints to
court, and group lawsuits
are effective
in publicly correcting bad corporate behavior.
What
's more, critics say, these laws
are preemptive measures — offering to steel religious business owners from having to serve same sex couples, should the Supreme
Court in June return a verdict giving same sex couples a federal
right to marry.
Last week a London
court ruled that a plumber
was entitled to full employment
rights despite
being technically self - employed,
in a case seen as a key test which could force employers to start offering irregular workers benefits including pensions and holiday pay.
Same sex marriage
is now legal
in 36 states, and the Supreme
Court will issue a final ruling on whether such couples have a federal
right to marry
in June.
«The
court rejected (the plaintiff's) theory that the newspaper's publication violated her
right to privacy because her post to MySpace
was made virtually to everyone with an internet connection,» Zaller wrote
in a blog post two years ago, asserting the case could apply to situations of employees posting on social media.
Two closed trial sessions took place on August 22 and September 24
in the Islamic Revolutionary
Court of Judge Abolqasem Salavati, who
is known to human
rights organizations for
being an instrument of Iran's security apparatus.
He called on Clinton to release her own list of potential Supreme
Court nominees, as he did this week, and said her list and his would
be «day and night»
in terms of views on gun
rights.
The
Court of Appeal rejected the arguments, saying Mars Canada had an obvious interest
in defending its trademark
rights, and it did sustain actual damages given that its sales
were cannibalized by the grey market products.
In a document called a «friend of the
court brief» which has been submitted to the Supreme Court, the leagues argue that what Aereo does is a violation of their «exclusive retransmission licensing rights.&r
court brief» which has
been submitted to the Supreme
Court, the leagues argue that what Aereo does is a violation of their «exclusive retransmission licensing rights.&r
Court, the leagues argue that what Aereo does
is a violation of their «exclusive retransmission licensing
rights.»
It might
be right: the CRA got thrashed
in the Supreme
Court in 2012 on one of its biggest transfer pricing cases, a long - running dispute with GlaxoSmithKline.
WASHINGTON, April 24 - Foreign corporations can not
be sued
in American
courts for human
rights abuses committed overseas, the U.S. Supreme
Court ruled on Tuesday, refusing to revive a lawsuit claiming Jordan - based Arab Bank Plc helped finance militant attacks
in Israel and the Palestinian territories.
«Since the Heller case, the next great question for the Supreme
Court to decide
was whether there
is a
right to carry guns
in public,» Winkler told the AP.
This decision probably shouldn't have
been a surprise, because it basically said that the
court's 2010 decision
in the Citizens United case, upholding the
right of corporations to spend money
in federal elections, applies to the states as well.
Yum, which will spin off its China restaurants on Oct. 31, said the last quarter started well there — but its stores
were hit by protests after an international
court rejected China's claim to historic
rights in the South China Sea.
WASHINGTON, April 24 - The U.S. Supreme
Court on Tuesday ruled that foreign corporations can not
be sued
in American
courts for human
rights abuses overseas, refusing to revive a lawsuit claiming Jordan - based Arab Bank Plc helped finance militant attacks
in Israel and the Palestinian territories.
May 30: Google launches tool that enables Europeans to request «
right to
be forgotten»
in response to ruling by European
Court of Justice.
«
In the district court, NFIB's standing was established by many individual small business - owners, in addition to Mary Brown, all of whom are members of NFIB and who have exercised their right to not purchase insurance,» says Karen Harned, executive director of NFIB's legal cente
In the district
court, NFIB's standing
was established by many individual small business - owners,
in addition to Mary Brown, all of whom are members of NFIB and who have exercised their right to not purchase insurance,» says Karen Harned, executive director of NFIB's legal cente
in addition to Mary Brown, all of whom
are members of NFIB and who have exercised their
right to not purchase insurance,» says Karen Harned, executive director of NFIB's legal center.
There
's a lot of chatter
right now about Instagram, an iPhone app for adding artsy filters to photos and sharing them across various social - media networks, which has taken the early - adopter crowd by storm and
courted heavy investor interest
in the mobile photo - sharing niche.
After
courts in B.C. and Ontario ruled that same - sex marriages should
be recognized under the Charter of
Rights and Freedoms, Harper charged the Liberals «wanted to introduce this through back channels.
In 2014, Europe's highest
court ruled that people had the «
right to
be forgotten» online, meaning they could ask Google and other digital companies to delete search results about them.
And
right now there
is one particular nondisclosure agreement that has Trump back
in court — the one keeping Stormy Daniels quiet.
CFPB director Richard Cordray announced that
rights of groups of consumers to a day
in court is «a cherished tenet of our justice system» and «that no one, no matter how big or how powerful, should escape accountability if they break the law.»
It
is found
in most collective agreements across the country, and it survived a bitter 1991 Charter of
Rights and Freedoms challenge at the Supreme
Court of Canada.
To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, you agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Daily Harvest, and our respective past, present and future employees, officers, directors, contractors, consultants, equityholders, suppliers, vendors, service providers, parent companies, subsidiaries, affiliates, agents, representatives, predecessors, successors and assigns (individually and collectively, the «Daily Harvest Parties»), from and against all actual or alleged Daily Harvest Party or third party claims, damages, awards, judgments, losses, liabilities, obligations, penalties, interest, fees, expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys» fees and expenses) and costs (including, without limitation,
court costs, costs of settlement and costs of pursuing indemnification and insurance), of every kind and nature whatsoever, whether known or unknown, foreseen or unforeseen, matured or unmatured, or suspected or unsuspected,
in law or equity, whether
in tort, contract or otherwise (collectively, «Claims»), including, but not limited to, damages to property or personal injury, that
are caused by, arise out of or
are related to (a) your use or misuse of the Sites, Content or Products, (b) any User Content you create, post, share or store on or through the Sites or our pages or feeds on third party social media platforms, (c) any Feedback you provide, (d) your violation of these Terms, (e) your violation of the
rights of another, and (f) any third party's use or misuse of the Sites or Products provided to you.
In an emailed statement, James Fitz - Morris, a spokesman for Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada, said Canada
is committed to
righting historical wrongs committed against Indigenous people and that the federal government
is working to resolve the matter out of
court, as it did with the Sixties Scoop survivors» class action.
Mr. Stris contends that his client
was misled and that the contract
was executed under fraudulent circumstances, giving her the
right to sue
in court rather than proceed
in arbitration.
«The DOL has created a new private
right of action,» said Fleckner, who led Goodwin's successful defense of an excessive fee claim against John Hancock
in the 3rd Circuit
Court of Appeals
in 2014, and
was a signatory to an amicus brief filed with the Supreme
Court on behalf of the Securities Industry Financial Markets Association
in Tibble v. Edison.
It also gives him the
right to obtain an injunction barring her from speaking while disputes
are considered
in arbitration or open
court.
They permitted forum selection bylaws while not making Delaware the exclusive forum; seemed to
be limiting appraisal
rights exercises by awarding lower amounts; and
in conferences and outside the
court, indicated a deliberative approach to the fee - shifting issue.