First Corinthians 9 contains Paul's defense of
his right as an apostle to receive money from the people he minister among, but his refusal to do so in spite of his rights.
Not exact matches
I am reading your newest posts to your oldest.I have never been to bible school but I consider myself in the journey of education concerning the bible.more than any opinions that you have what concerns me most is how «brothers and sisters» through their comments responds to someone who thinks differently from what is perceived
as absolutes (not sure if that's the
right term) in scripture.I wonder did the
apostle believe half the things that are seen
as church doctirine today?how did the disciples who did not have the new testament or the ability to read follow Jesus?I appreciate your questioning.In my experience we are too quick to try and fix someone or use the scriptures
as a control mechanism and to slow to practise empathy and love..
Though this is not meant to imply that an educated layman ought not also sometimes have the courage, in the
right place and in the
right manner, to give an account of the hope that is in him and,
as the
apostle says, is active in his life.
In fact one (of many) miscues in the gospels is when Jesus is claimed to have ordered his
apostles to «take up the cross» — the cross would not have had meaning to Jesus when he was living... unless of course... oh
right... the cross had been around
as a religious symbol for thousands of years... oops.
Jesus Christ, is and it will be forever more the unique object lesson of living, the human being not ever, although we may be Christians we don't leave of to sin, for the very her writing she says Aerquémonos confiadamente at the throne of your handsomeness in order to reach forgiving in order to the perpetual help, in
as much
as not tenemos one God which not it can feel pity for of we, rather one which fué tempting all over, but without sin, according to the letter at the age of Hebrews, and the
apostle John she says, whether various hubiere sin, solicitor tenemos in order to with the parent to Jesus Christ the that's
right, not ever not any human being it will be the best object lesson not other than The Christ Jesus, nor Buddah bo Mahoma nor none, we don't follow to humanity rather at a God which fué tempting all over but without sin, not ever we owe put her scope in the humanity not other than in the.
Right after the
apostle Paul encouraged Ephesian wives to submit to their husbands
as they would to Christ, and Ephesian husbands to love their wives
as Christ loved the Church, he instructed Ephesian slaves to «obey your earthly masters with respect and fear, and with sincerity of heart, just
as you would obey Christ» (Ephesians 6:5).
This is certainly how Matthew 24:14 has been understood, from the age of the
apostles right through the dawn of the modern ecumenical movement: «And this Gospel of the kingdom will be preached in the whole world
as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come.»
As a philosopher he was an ardent Hegelian, and from his arrival he exercised for three semesters the traditional right of a theological Repetent to lecture on philosophy, lecturing enthusiastically and successfully as an apostle of Hege
As a philosopher he was an ardent Hegelian, and from his arrival he exercised for three semesters the traditional
right of a theological Repetent to lecture on philosophy, lecturing enthusiastically and successfully
as an apostle of Hege
as an
apostle of Hegel.
However, we are told that when Festus asked him if he was willing to return to Jerusalem for trial, the
apostle became alarmed and appealed to Caesar,
as was his
right as a Roman citizen.
Paul may,
as he says in Philemon (vs. 8 - 10), «prefer to appeal» in the name of love; but he does not fail to make clear that in doing so he is voluntarily relinquishing a
right «to command» of which
as an
apostle he is deeply conscious and which he expects his churches to acknowledge.
Decisions had to be made from time to time
as to where or when services of the church would be held; the church needed to be told of the impending visit of an
apostle, or of some prophet or teacher from abroad; a question has been raised
as to the good faith of one of these visitors, and there must be some discussion of the point and a decision on it; a fellow Christian from another church is on a journey and needs hospitality; a member of the local congregation planning to visit a church abroad needs a letter of introduction to that church, which someone must be authorized to provide; a serious dispute about property
rights or some other legal matter has arisen between two of the brothers and the church must name someone to help them settle the issue or must in some other way deal with it; a new local magistrate has begun to prosecute Christians for violating the law against unlicensed assembly, and consideration must be given to ways and means of meeting this crisis; charges have been brought against one of the members by another member, and these must be investigated and perhaps some disciplinary action taken; one of the members has died, and the church is called on for some special action in behalf of his family in the emergency; differences of opinion exist in the church on certain questions of morals or belief (such
as marriage and divorce, or the resurrection), differences which local prophets and teachers are apparently unable to compose, and a letter must be written to the
apostle — who will write this letter and what exactly will it say?
The
apostle Paul states that «We know that the whole creation has been groaning
as in the pains of childbirth
right up to the present time» (Romans 8:22).