O'Donovan was our Erasmus Lecturer last year, and that was the occasion of a very lively and productive exchange on biblical truth and
the right ordering of society.
Not exact matches
According to the Kerner Commission's analysis, racist white America was similarly bereft
of moral resources, such that government, rather than the institutions
of civil
society that had been so central to the classic civil -
rights movement, had to become the principal agent
of enforced social change in
order to deal with the crisis
of an America «moving toward two
societies... separate and unequal.»
Countries and
societies especially the US are carried away with everything under the umbrella
of freedom and
rights your governments should learn from third world countries true values and laws.certain lines should never be crossed and such movements need to be exterminated for the sake
of youngsters that must learn true values and acts in
order to be a well being and not end up in jail and on the long run in hell.
The exercise
of rights and freedoms is limited «for the purpose
of securing due recognition and respect for the
rights and freedoms
of others and
of meeting the just requirements
of morality, public
order, and general welfare in a democratic
society.»
We affirm democracy as the type
of government that holds the most promise for the just and good
ordering of society and that best protects human
rights and dignity.
Modernity's emphasis on secularism involves three elements - a) the desacralisation
of nature which produced a nature devoid
of spirits preparing the way for its scientific analysis and technological control and use; b) desacralisation
of society and state by liberating them from the control
of established authority and laws
of religion which often gave spiritual sanction to social inequality and stifled freedom
of reason and conscience
of persons; it was necessary to affirm freedom and equality as fundamental
rights of all persons and to enable common action in politics and
society by adherents
of all religions and none in a religiously pluralistic
society; and c) an abandonment
of an eternally fixed sacred
order of human
society enabling
ordering of secular social affairs on the basis
of rational discussion.
Marty's new book is a resource for people
of conviction who want to be good citizens in a pluralistic
society: «You want to do the
right thing by your God, your tradition, your country, the public
order, the law and the courts, and your fellow citizens.
The work
of Evangelicals and Catholics Together has continued unabated over the last twenty years, issuing documents pertaining to theological questions (such as the nature
of justification) as well as those affecting the proper
ordering of society (such as the
rights of the unborn).
It is also being asked whether women and youth and minority groups and even white men have to play just the roles they have been assigned in the past in
order to maintain just the
right balance
of energy and repression in an industrial
society.
The
right to life, to inviolability, to freedom is an indispensable part
of any moral
order of society.»
If the point
of religion is to bring peace and guide a culture toward certain specific behaviors, primarily for
order and the preservation
of the good qualities
of society, then how can one say that one religion is better than another or that a «religion-less» person who STILL acts the SAME way (i.e. does
right unto their neighbors, lives according to the thing the bible suggests) but is more tolerant is not as high quality a citizen as another who is associated with a Major League Religious Team?
It follows too that because
of the enduring continuity
of its now definitive social
order, the
society as a whole transcends individual constituent activity and survives in its own
right despite the constant changes in its membership.
«The future
of Burma must be peace, a peace based on respect for the dignity and
rights of each member
of society, respect for each ethnic group and its identity, respect for the rule
of law, and respect for a democratic
order that enables each individual and every group - none excluded - to offer its legitimate contribution to the common good,» he said.
There would be no external standards
of what is
right and wrong, just and unjust, moral and immoral, by which its results could be judged; there would be no guarantee that, even in the absence
of outside intervention, globalization would be a benign process; and there would be no assurance that in a free
society, left to itself, we could count on an evolution
of moral beliefs to generate values which would continue to underpin the market
order.19
«The
order of society» (in mediaeval Christendom), writes David Edwards, «was at bottom upheld by religion... It was God who decreed the acceptance
of the
rights and duties
of each grade in
society.
The very great advantage to this «system» was that
society was organized on a classical and Christian tradition that understood the tension
of human existence, in
right order, as a function
of Plato's metaxy, e.g. the movement
of consciousness between immanence and transcendence.
The worldly church is usually a church which seeks to maintain the old
order in
society and with it the power
of the monarchs and aristocrats,
of the owners
of property and
of other vested
rights.
First, since human
society always employs violence to enforce some set
of standards, Christians» whom Christ called to live out a radically different form
of community, one in which it is the crucified rather than his judges who is vindicated as God's Word» should simply take up the burden
of civic
order and abandon the Gospel where prudentially necessary because, you know, someone absolutely has to kill heretics, and so we should make sure the
right heretics get killed.
To my way
of thinking, the Whig tradition — and particularly the Catholic Whig tradition — offers the world's best statement
of philosophical principles and practical guidelines concerning how and why free citizens should shape new
societies worthy
of their human
rights and
ordered liberties.
I believe we are experiencing in the West
right now an upheaval comparable to that which the fourth century produced, with the end
of the Roman
order and the general spread
of Christianity: the moment when the ancient world was plunged into another world, another
society, another conception
of the universe.
«Drawing on powers vested by Section 45 (1)
of the Constitution, and Section 97a
of the Penal Code, the governor signed an
order declaring the IMN as an unlawful
society in the interest
of public
order and to protect the
rights and freedoms
of all persons in Kaduna State, he said.
Perhaps it is time for mainstream left - wing and
right - wing parties to unify within and across European countries in
order to champion policies that promote inclusivity over exclusivity in their visions
of society.
Professor Aaron Michael Oquaye has written and published journals on several topics including politics In Ghana 1982 - 1992, culture, conflict and traditional Authority in Africa: a Ghanaian perspective in the Political economy
of peace and security in Africa, human
rights in Africa in the new global
order: a dilemma as well as civil
society and the domestic policy environment in Ghana.
I am a 6 and have always
ordered a 6 with Sole
Society - they have almost always fit just
right, except for a couple
of sandals in the summer that ran a bit big.
Isn't it a bit ironic to stay out
of society in
order to find the
right person in
society to spend your life with?I'll admit, I do know people that have met through internet dating that are now enjoying amazing marriages, but I'd like to...
Isn't it a bit ironic to stay out
of society in
order to find the
right person in
society to spend your life with?
In the area
of promotion, activities
of different types are carried out on diverse themes (forgotten conflicts,
rights in the city, emerging
rights, human
rights in the street...) but with a common objective; to spread the culture
of human
rights in our
society in
order to make effective the respect, enjoyment and guarantee
of fundamental
rights.
are necessary in a democratic
society in the interests
of public safety, for the protection
of public
order, health or morals, or for the protection
of the
rights and freedoms
of others (Art. 9 (2), ECHR)
And that's just detrimental to the good and fundamental
order of society,
right?
Other than to its employees, contractors and affiliated organizations, as described above, National Humane
Society discloses potentially personally - identifying and personally - identifying information only in response to a subpoena, court
order or other governmental request, or when National Humane
Society believes in good faith that disclosure is reasonably necessary to protect the property or
rights of National Humane
Society, third parties or the public at large.
In
order to reproduce any images
of Dan Flavin, you must obtain the copyright license from Artists
Rights Society (ARS) by contacting them directly at:
US
society needs to make the
right choices today in
order to assure adequate, affordable supplies
of both energy and water.
Generally what separates the left and
right is that the
right favour preserving the existing
order and tradition
of society, and usually only support modest reforms in line with their goals.
In her reasons, the judge wrote that she has «no doubt that the
right to a climate system capable
of sustainable human life is fundamental to a free and
ordered society,» and that «a stable climate system is quite literally the foundation
of society without which there would be neither civilization nor progress.»
The bitter varieties
of this risk irony are virtually endless; among them is the fact, that, in
order to protect their populations from the danger
of terrorism, states increasingly limit civil
rights and liberties, with the result that in the end the open, free
society may be abolished, but the terrorist threat is by no means averted.
I am involved
right now in a case to which the respondent Law
Society of BC was easily able to secure a court
order sealing the record and denying the public access to any hearings, though it is not clear to us on what basis that
order is supposedly justified.
If a person pretends such a marriage, and proclaims it to others, the law considers it as a malicious act, subjecting the party against whom it is set up to various disadvantages
of fortune and reputation, and imposing upon the public (which for many reasons is interested in knowing the real state and condition
of the individuals who compose it) an untrue character; interfering in many possible consequences with the good
order of society, as well as the
rights of those who are entitled to its protection.
Through their counsel, Mulgrew and Postmedia argued that they should not have to fulfil production
orders by the law
society and turn over notes made by the journalist, because to do so would violate both s. 7 and s. 8
of the Canadian Charter
of Rights and Freedoms.
It presages a law captured by the rhetoric
of the
right to freedom
of expression without due regard to the value underlying the particular exercise
of that
right; a law in which, under the guise
of the
right to freedom
of expression, the «
right» to offend can be exercised without responsibility or restraint providing it does not cause a disruption or disturbance in the nature
of public disorder; a law in which an impoverished amoral concept
of «public
order» is judicially ordained; a law in which the
right to freedom
of expression trumps — or tramples upon — other
rights and values which are the vital
rights and properties
of a free and democratic
society; a law to which any number
of vulnerable individuals and minorities may be exposed to uncivil, and even odious, ethnic, sexist, homophobic, anti-Christian, anti-Semitic, and anti-Islamic taunts providing no public disorder results; a law in which good and decent people can be used as fodder to promote a cause or promote an action for which they are not responsible and over which they have no direct control; a law which demeans the dignity
of the persons adversely affected by those asserting their
right to freedom
of expression in a disorderly or offensive manner; a law in which the mores or standards
of society are set without regard to the reasonable expectations
of citizens in a free and democratic
society; and a law marked by a lack
of empathy by the sensibilities, feelings and emotional frailties
of people who can be deeply and genuinely affronted by language and behaviour that is beyond the pale in a civil and civilised
society.
It provides a set
of principles for the law as it affects persons with disabilities in
order to counteract negative stereotypes and assumptions and reaffirm the status
of persons with disabilities as equal members
of society and bearers
of both
rights and responsibilities: Law Commission
of Ontario, Framework for the Law as It Affects Persons with Disabilities, online http://www.lco-cdo.org/en/disabilities-final-report-framework.
Any act
of terrorism is a painful hit to any
society and its innocent members — it should always be strongly underlined that there is no justification for targeting any human's life due to any form
of extremism, and one must bear in mind that often it is not about the death itself, but to intimidate the nations in
order for them to become more vulnerable, and to limit widely understood human
rights as this kind
of society, namely the threatened
society, is much is easier to be governed.
Both
of these freedoms may be made subject to limitations embodied in statutes, and which are necessary in a democratic
society in
order to maintain public safety, protect health or morality or to defend the
rights of other persons.
It noted the requirement under Article 9 (2) that any limitation placed upon that
right must be prescribed by law and necessary in a democratic
society in
order to serve a legitimate aim, including the
rights and freedoms
of others, which could be invoked by the defendant in this case.
The
order was justifiable under Article 10, since it was both prescribed by law and necessary in a democratic
society in
order to protect the integrity
of the legal proceedings and A's article 3
rights [69]- [76].
The mission
of the ILRC is to work with, educate, and enhance the capacity
of immigrants, community organizations, and the legal sector, in
order to build a democratic
society that values diversity, dignity, and the
rights of all people.
In a recent judgment, Justice Lynne Smith
of the British Columbia Supreme Court identified grounds upon which to reopen the question
of the constitutionality
of the criminal prohibition against physician - assisted dying, claiming, in effect, that while the Supreme Court had at the time
of the Rodriguez been correct in stating that a blanket prohibition on physician - assisted dying would be rationally connected to the goal
of protecting the most vulnerable people in Canadian
society, such a prohibition is overbroad (you don't need to deny everyone the
right to physician - assisted suicide in
order to protect
society's most vulnerable persons) and grossly disproportionate in its effects.
Speech by Sir James Munby (president
of the family courts) to the
Society of editors: - «I have said this many times in the past but it must never be forgotten that, with the state's abandonment
of the
right to impose capital sentences,
orders of the kind which family judges are typically invited to make in public law proceedings are amongst the most drastic that any judge in any jurisdiction is ever empowered to make.
Both solutions will occur because the power
of the news media and
of the internet, interacting, will quickly make widely known these types
of information, the cumulative effect
of which will force governments and the courts to act: (1) the situations
of the thousands
of people whose lives have been ruined because they could not obtain the help
of a lawyer; (2) the statistics as to the increasing percentages
of litigants who are unrepresented and clogging the courts, causing judges to provide more public warnings; (3) the large fees that some lawyers charge; (4) increasing numbers
of people being denied Legal Aid and court - appointed lawyers; (5) the many years that law
societies have been unsuccessful in coping with this problem which continues to grow worse; (6) people prosecuted for «the unauthorized practice
of law» because they tried to help others desperately in need
of a lawyer whom they couldn't afford to hire; (7) that there is no truly effective advertising creating competition among law firms that could cause them to lower their fees; (8) that law
societies are too comfortably protected by their monopoly over the provision
of legal services, which is why they might block the expansion
of the paralegal profession, and haven't effectively innovated with electronic technology and new infrastructure so as to be able to solve this problem; (9) that when members
of the public access the law
society website they don't see any reference to the problem that can assure them that something effective is being done and, (10) in
order for the rule
of law, the Canadian Charter
of Rights and Freedoms, and the whole
of Canada's constitution be able to operate effectively and command sufficient respect, the majority
of the population must be able to obtain a lawyer at reasonable cost.
While at UNL, Ms. Trent - Vilim served as an executive editor
of the Nebraska Law Review, was voted into the
Order of the Coif, a national legal honor
society, and received CALI Excellence for the Future Awards in Appellate Advocacy and International Human
Rights Law.
• Administrative Law • Antitrust & Regulated Industries • Asian Law • Bankruptcy, Reorganization, & Creditors»
Rights • Canadian Law • Comparative Law • Constitutional Law, Jurisprudence & Legal Philosophy Journals • Contracts & Commercial Law • Corporate, Securities & Finance Law Journals • Criminal Law & Procedure • Cyberspace Law • Discrimination, Law & Justice • Employment, Labor, Compensation & Pension Journals • English & Commonwealth Law • Environmental Law & Policy • European Law Journals • Evidence & Evidentiary Procedure • Experimental & Empirical Studies • Family & Children's Law • Health Law Journals • Housing & Community Development Law • Forensic Economics • Immigration, Refugee & Citizenship Law • India Law • Indigenous Nations & Peoples Law • Insurance Law, Legislation, & Policy • Intellectual Property Law • International Law & Trade • LSN Educator: Courses, Materials & Teaching • Law & Economics • Law & Humanities • Law & Humanities / Legal History (Archive) • Law & Positive Political Theory • Law &
Society • Law, Institutions & Development • Law, Norms & Informal
Order • Legal Education • Legal Ethics & Professional Responsibility • Legal History • Legislation & Statutory Interpretation • Litigation, Procedure & Dispute Resolution Journals • National Security & Foreign Relations Law • Nonprofit & Philanthropy Law • Property, Citizenship, & Social Entrepreneurism • Property, Land Use & Real Estate Law • Regulation
of Financial Institutions • Tax Law & Policy Journals • Torts & Products Liability Law • Wills, Trusts, & Estates Law • Women, Gender & the Law • Young Scholars Law