Sentences with phrase «right out of the book»

There are whole chapters of John's Gospel that I would like to snip right out of the book so that no child ever has to read what John said Jesus said about Jews.

You don't need to go into an interview with practiced lines right out of books with titles like 100 Snappy Answers to Tough Interview Questions.

When Meggie's father reads aloud, characters jump right out of the book into the real world.

We really liked the page turn speed right out of the book!

Not exact matches

It was a play right out of the cellphone industry's book.

In 2006, a fresh - out - of - prison Jordan Belfort chose Leonardo DiCaprio and Martin Scorsese to option his book rights in a $ 330,000 deal based at Warner Bros..

On top of the royalties that come with selling over 400 million books worldwide, she's made the most out of her subsidiary rights.

Your book might turn out to be one of those streams, but it is more likely to help you earn other income than to be a major profit center in its own right.

In his book, Angry White Men, which came out in 2013 but seems even more relevant now, Kimmel surveys the growing rage among neo-Nazis, gamers, right wing talk radio hosts and men's rights activists who define their masculinity and manhood in terms of dominance and power and who believe in their «God - given right» to rule the world.

-- Right On The Money: a book on preparing yourself to come out of the next crisis wealthier than you started

The modern day tycoon can take a few pages out of his book, and still not get it right.

That is no time to be reading a book on the theory of diversification... When you find something where you know the business is within your circle of competence, you understand it, the price is right, the people are right — then you take your thumb out of your mouth and you barrel in» Warren Buffett

The end of the book is not about «heaven out there» but earth right here.

Maybe you can put it out of your mind by steering us to the right books.

But if you look at the bible and how christians use it by picking out what parts they agree with and dismissing the horror of it as «cultural of the times» it says to me that their sense of right and wrong is more evolved than the book they claim is the final authority of right and wrong.

Atheists are not out protesting against equal rights or basing equal rights off of a book written 2000 years ago.

And with over 38,000 different denominations of xtianity out there (all taking something different from the same book mind you) who has it right?

In his review of Walter Kasper's book on mercy, Daniel P. Moloney is no doubt right to point out the strangeness of the apparent opposition between mercy and truth that is operative in that work.

This enemy — with no concept of human rights — threw the rule book out on fighting, and our soldiers had to face that.

It is christians who are out attempting to impose their views (ie: denial of gay rights b / c their book apparently says so; denial of women's rights; using the threat of hell; teaching dis - proven creationism to innocent children) on the public.

Well Right now I'm reading As.sholes Finish First by Tucker Max, just finished «I hope they serve beer in hel.l», right before then I read all the Game of Thrones books (I guess we'll have to cut out book one according to your rules because season 1 is book one), I'm also in the midst of reading the god delusion by DawRight now I'm reading As.sholes Finish First by Tucker Max, just finished «I hope they serve beer in hel.l», right before then I read all the Game of Thrones books (I guess we'll have to cut out book one according to your rules because season 1 is book one), I'm also in the midst of reading the god delusion by Dawright before then I read all the Game of Thrones books (I guess we'll have to cut out book one according to your rules because season 1 is book one), I'm also in the midst of reading the god delusion by Dawkins.

I'll have a separate post about that soon - ish but I'll just say that I was underwhelmed and right out of the gate, I disagreed with the premise so that makes it hard to enjoy the whole book.

For right now, read some of those books, and check out some of the websites.

And if things don't move in that direction - well, you might find he has nice friends, or he might turn out to be right for one of your friends, or you might just have a pleasant evening, or he might introduce you to some new ideas, books, music or interests.

He may also be faced with incomprehension and hostility when he tries to persuade the school not to support «Red Nose Day» or «Jeans for Genes»; when he suggests that asking pupils to stand at the front of the class and shout out the names of intimate body parts is an invasion of their modesty; when he objects to the non-Catholic geography teacher's presentation of solutions for over-population, the «gay rights» agenda seeping in through text books, the chaplaincyco - ordinator's failure to get abortion agency leaflets removed from the library, or the school nurse's distribution of cards with information on how to get the morning - after pill.

tf: Did you once consider that maybe the reason it appears we speak out more against your god than other gods is because it is your gods believers that seem to be at the center of so much in this world??? I don't see Pagan's standing on street corners or attempting to use their holy books to deny equal rights.

If you want to read a rough draft of the content of this book, check out the sections on this page: «Close Your Church for Good» about «Giving up Your Rites» and «Giving Up Your Rights.»

Peter Limper is right to point out, in his perceptive review of MP, that my handling of that theme in the latter part of the book is too sketchy (PS 6:214 - 20).

My constant purpose was and is to adumbrate on every subject I handle a genuinely canonical interpretation of Scripture - a view that in its coherence embraces and expresses the thrust of all the biblical passages and units of thought that bear on my theme - a total, integrated view built out of biblical material in such a way that, if the writers of the various books knew what I had made of what they taught, they would nod their heads and say that I had got them right.

Then John sees, in God's right hand, a book sealed with seven seals; the opening of the seals, and the consequent events, are described in 5:1 - 8:5 (chapter 7 deals with another sealing, that of 144,000 men out of the twelve tribes of Israel).

Spelled out in a lengthy lead editorial entitled «Evangelicals in the Social Struggle,» as well as in books such as Aspects of Christian Social Ethics, Henry's understanding of Christian social responsibility stressed (a) society's need for the spiritual regeneration of all men and women, (b) an interim social program of humanitarian care, ethical proclamation, and personal, structural application, and (c) a theory of limited government centering on certain «freedom rights,» e. g., the rights to public property, free speech, and so on.18 Though the shape of this social ethic thus closely parallels that of the present editorial position of Moody Monthly, it must be distinguished from its counterpart by the time period involved (it pushed others like Moody Monthly into a more active involvement in the social arena), by the intensity of its commitment to social responsibility, by the sophistication of its insight into political theory and practice, and by its willingness to offer structural critique on the American political system.

As the Good Book has warned, there will come an age when people just will themselves choose confusion more than what is right and morally just to preserve their sinful ways instead of seeking the One they need to perfect them as a human person with dignity as a divine image of noble and holy existence, instead do de - basing themselves out of a healthy and happier existence even on earth.

They include the «chilling effects» of libel suits, the perennial conflicts between property and access, the three out of four publishers who intervene in news decisions affecting their local markets, the advertisers» freedom to move their money to where their interests are, industry self - regulation in broadcasting and advertising, the backlash against conveying under duress (as in a hostage crisis) points of view that are never aired as directly without duress, the flareups of book banning and censorship of textbooks, the rout of the civil rights movement, the retreat from principles of fairness and equality (even where never implemented), the attack on scientific and humane teaching, the threat of self - appointed media watchdogs to also spy on teachers in the classroom, and the general vigor of ancient orthodoxies masquarading as neo-this and neo-that.

It shall be when he sitteth on the throne of his kingdom that he shall write for himself a copy of this law in a book out of that which is before the priests, the Levites, and it shall be with him and he shall read therein all the days of his life that he may learn to fear the Lord his God, to keep all the words of this law and these statutes to do them; that his heart be not lifted up above his brethren, and that he turn not aside from the commandment to the right or to the left (Deut.

You know right know in Texas school books they are trying to cut Jefferson out of the equation in history... thought I'd raise that odd point.

Early in the book he tells of a sex educator in one of his classes who burst out with this tirade against Kilpatrick's Why Johnny Can't Tell Right from Wrong: «Even though Kilpatrick has almost convinced me that what I do as a sex educator is counterproductive in many ways, I'd never admit it to him, nor would I change anything I do.

The first couple of books start out as typical «solve - this - murder» sort of books (without being gory or cruel or gratuitous, it's more about the story and the characters)-- very satisfying Saturday night read — but as the books go forward, the layers and complex storytelling becomes even more clear and right around book three or four you begin to realise that everything is connected and everything means something and something major is unfolding and OMG MUST KEEP READING.

You are right about being the Children of Israel and of Ismael out of which came the Jews and the non Jews who you reffered here to by Arabs... The tale of the Books that there will be wars and finally at Jerusalem between two groups consisting of «Believers» who would recognize and believe in Jesus when he returns they are of «Jews / Christians / Muslims» and the second group are the «Non Believers» who wouldn't recognize or believe in Jesus when he returns they are of «Jews / Christians / Muslims»....

I read and underlined all of the books, downloaded podcasts, I wrote and waxed philosophic about discipleship, about the theology of place, about community, sustainability, intentional organic church practices, justice, mercy, redemption, I was seeking an active and inclusive living out of the Jesus - life I knew right now.

And some of the comments on these sites have taken a page right out of Maranatha Campus Ministries» old book.

CHRISTIAN PUBLISHING AND THE PERILS OF PEER REVIEWS Right off the bat I have to tell you that I have a book coming out this summer published by a real publisher, Darton, Longman and...

that book says I only had to die once and then the judgement, but we may have to postpone the Big Day a bit so I can go down there and shed some blood because of those bone - headed followers of mine...» He hasn't gotten back to me... but you're right there, my son, William, they are pretty damn wicked....god - damned I'll tell ya... BTW, William, like your thoughts... If I do come back we'll have to get together... maybe you could be, like, an Aide or something... can't promise you it'll be good pay, but, we can always milk the Televangelist out of a few bucks... let me know...

It's crazy to think that the Pharisees knew the book inside and out yet the Author was right there in front of them and they couldn't recognize Him.

In describing and accounting for the lives of the Religious Right, which we define simply as religious conservatives with a considerable involvement in political activity, the book and the series tell the story primarily by focusing on leading episodes in the movement's history, including, but not limited to, the groundwork laid by Billy Graham in his relationships with presidents and other prominent political leaders; the resistance of evangelical and other Protestants to the candidacy of the Roman Catholic John F. Kennedy; the rise of what has been called the New Right out of the ashes of Barry Goldwater's defeat in 1964; a battle over sex education in Anaheim, California, in the mid-1960's; a prolonged cultural war over textbooks in West Virginia in the early 1970's — and that is a battle that has been fought less violently in community after community all over the country; the thrill conservative Christians felt over the election of a «born - again» Christian to the Presidency in 1976 and the subsequent disappointment they experienced when they found out that Jimmy Carter was, of all things, a Democrat; the rise of the Moral Majority and its infatuation with Ronald Reagan; the difficulty the Religious Right has had in dealing with abortion, homosexuality and AIDS; Pat Robertson's bid for the presidency and his subsequent launching of the Christian Coalition; efforts by Dr. James Dobson and Gary Bauer to win a «civil war of values» by changing the culture at a deeper level than is represented by winning elections; and, finally, by addressing crucial questions about the appropriate relationship between religion and politics or, as we usually put it, between church and state.

It was not to be found in the overtly public (dare I say American) ministry of marching for civil rights and peace, or in his commentaries and books on public culture; but rather it was the interpersonal, interior expeditions of a shared faith (a quintessential Canadian attribute born out of long, cold winters spent indoors).

With hundreds of Christian sects with hundreds of different twists of their holy book, what makes you sure you can pick out the «right one», rather than the one that simply aligns with your preconceived notions?

That's right, this recipe came straight out of the new Weight Watchers cook book AND it's made in the slow cooker.

Maybe it's because things are a little hairy right now with my book coming out (3 more sleeps yikes), or maybe because it's almost Spring, or maybe I just have an inkling of major movement on the horizon, but I have this strong urge to simplify my life lately.

Check out the sneak peek of the book right here on the blog, and see for yourself why you want this cookbook the minute it comes out (click on the link above, the link in the sidebar, or the picture just below to see the whole.

I have discovered that these recipes should be followed pretty closely - every time I try to substitute or add a little less of an ingredient it doesn't turn out the same, and it seems to take me a second try to get each dessert just right, especially for the desserts which don't have pictures in this book.