Sentences with phrase «right over wrong»

Choosing right over wrong, ethics over convenience, and truth over popularity... these are the choices that measure your life.

«New York City won't give up, because we will always stand up for right over wrong.»

We just celebrated the festival of Dusshera which marks the win of right over wrong.

Despite the unique horror of our present danger, I can not avoid taking courage from still another source: the unexpected, unforeseeable victories of right over wrong in history.

We demand the triumph of right over wrong!»

Not exact matches

One word that makes us happy: Progress [21:21] We grow because that helps us give more — share it with someone you love, it magnifies it [22:04] More excited about feeding one billion people than any material thing, so much more meaning when it's not just about you [22:19] The challenge is our brain: it's looking for what's wrong, because that helps you survive [22:30] Peak state = high energy, feel extraordinary, producing results is easy [22:46] Low energy state = say things and do things that hurt your relationship [23:39] Peak State = Beautiful state, Low - energy state = suffering state [24:08] Over achievers don't suffer, right?

«There's nothing wrong with the company as it exists right now... I'm not talking about the company as I, kind of, took it over six months ago.

Protesters who torched Paraguay's Congress over the issue last week had the right idea, if wrong method.

You're right or wrong because the business does, or doesn't provide acceptable returns over time.

If Jews want, for instance, to respond to the internal Christian debate over the possibility of salvation for non-Christians, then it is perfectly fair to announce that according to Judaism, one side of that Christian debate is right and the other wrong.

The upshot is drearily typical of the Protestant mainline - a sour estrangement between a self - consciously «prophetic» national bureaucracy and a mostly traditionalist membership that puzzles over what went wrong and wonders what might be done to set things right.

So that means that the collective works of Theologians and Historians over the centuries has been all wrong and walla, here comes this Professor and she has it all right in one book.

State your case and stop crying over who is right and who is wrong.

Unless you think the amounts of the decay element are varying just the right amount to give a false positive to highly repeatable tests and calibrations from samples all over the world (and beyond with meteorites), then you are wrong.

What you don't see if the bigger picture, where government is dictating right and wrong and stepping all over our liberties «for the sake of the people».

Why torment ourselves and others over illusory quests for truth or falsity, right or wrong?

It is a powerful argument in the minds of many to be able to say, «I am right and those people over there are wrong because they don't believe the Bible, and so you better listen to me.»

We take our morals from the obvious... health is preferred over illness; violence of any form is wrong; equal rights for all is good regardless of who they are.

Actually, claims is the right word, and the bible has actually been proven wrong scientifically many times over.

If Jesus weeps over the death of a friend, gone too soon from this earth, then Phaedra is right to weep too for all that has gone wrong in Houston.

Over the years I have mentored many young and older men (and some women but I'm not supposed to in our Church) they all without exception know right from wrong.

Too many corners of the Church have been infected with a legalistic, performance - based view of God in which God stands over our lives with crossed arms and a disappointed scowl, applauding only when we get everything just right and rendering judgment on everything we do wrong.

Which, in turn, over time causes a world - view that «The professor is right... wow... I guess lots is wrong with my viewpoint.»

The critique carries over into ethics as well, with the rejection of the dualism of good and evil, right and wrong.

Not sure i am convinced because how do you explain the verse an eye for an eye in the old testament there have always been consequences for wrong doing and stiill are for sin.If we believe the word then that word is from God not satan.As far as satan is concerned he uses violence as his tools of trade he works on our fears and is limited to robbing stealing and destroying he does nt have anything else.Violence confirms to us that there is a spiritual battle going on both on the earthly plane and in the heavenlys and the battle is over souls.The verse the kingdon of heaven is expanding and violent people take it by force is referring to that spiritual battle and as satan uses violence to expand his dominion so does God use violence to counter him.So what does he mean by that term for me i think it is saying that the the force of evil that satan uses or violence is overcome by a greater violence or force a more powerful one that being the Love of Christ.Through the cross we see that clearly portrayed and in our lives that very same battle is still happening right now for dominion be clear if we walk in the flkesh satan will have dominion over us but if we walk according to the spirit and abide in Christ we have freedom from our old nature.and satan.He can oppose us but he wont be able to influence us if we are in Christ.

This is because «Right and Wrong» has changed over time and is different depending on where you are in the world.

There are over 250 recognized Sects of Protestant Christianity alone, and each is convinced they are the only ones who are right, and all the others, while their hearts are in the right place, are wrong.

The overall problem to this debate over who is right and who is wrong with their faith is where do people put their faith.

I get that I could visit, but that, unless I was willing to turn over responsibility for my own salvation to you and accept your understanding of right and wrong ahead of my own, visiting is all I can do.

using the stoning example or (The «rules» that define right and wrong are different all over our globe.)

The «rules» that define right and wrong are different all over our globe.

There's nothing wrong with being a political magazine, and we reserve the right to give occasional attention to who's up and who's down, who's in and who's out, and the conflicts over the definitions of ideologies.

The debate over who's in and who's out, who's right and who's wrong, was settled long ago.

That's not going to win anyone over to their cause, no matter whether it's right or wrong.

In another context I might include a chapter on «What is Right with Modern Life» as I did some years ago in The Modern Rival of Christian Faith, and most of the things there mentioned are still here and still right.l But along with the good things and some advances over the past years, there is too much that is wrong.

I'm not sure, do whatever you think is best, who am I to decide what's right and wrong, I'm just figuring it out too, you know, and suddenly you've crossed over to false humility.

The Right has always been wrong, and with their waning influence over the youth, you start to see the extremist froth rising to the top.

The argument over the right or wrong of a human being property is a separate issue.

He sometimes thinks, too, about whether it is morally right or wrong, and a loathing sweeps over his soul that he has to do so many things he does not believe in.

And since some people are incapable of knowing right from wrong, and making any choice either way either through age or handicap, the Bible tells us of a special grace that exists over certain individuals should they die.

Morals and ethics change over the years, and with them, «right» and «wrong».

The alternative is the steady courage and imagination that might, over time, restore the difficult but necessary dialectic between the politics of rights and laws and the politics of rights and wrongs.

A person or an institution demonstrates integrity not only by choosing right from wrong in a concrete situation but by maintaining a «commitment to the pattern over a wide range of different actual and potential decisions, in differing situations, with differing consequences and levels of predictability of such consequences.

I'd love to know in what areas you see that, because while I certainly agree that in many ways the human race differs from the Bible's standards of right and wrong, I really don't see that there's been much change over the last couple thousand years — certainly not since the time of the Greeks, when we start having our first comprehensive records outside the Bible.

For a particular behavior to be considered evil, the person committing the act must be in a position to knowingly make a moral choice between doing something wrong and doing something right, choosing the bad action over the good.

And to think that just because he is dependant on his mother's body to survive gives her rights over her life is wrong.

i guess we are lucky are parents were not gay or we would not all be here reading this the book allso says free will and ten comanments to live by its not up to us humans to judge when we all die we will know what we did right and what was wrong until then do what you do best to help keep the devil from taking over remember the devil and god have the same powers but only god can give you peace and love bottom line what or who you sleep with is your choice but don't keep rubbing my nose in it do your job and keep the rest to yourself

Whenever you feel the «urgent» need to jump into a fight over who is right and who is wrong, ask yourself this question: «Would I rather be right, or would I rather be kind?

When the right critters take over the first thing they do is kill off the wrong ones, and after a slight lull the starter starts smelling better and begins acting like a starter should.

WELL i am till trying, ordered in a good stand mixer, use the paddle beater use 9 × 5 pan got a new oven thermometer to make sure oven calibrated right, thermometer to test doneness of bread proofed the dough no more then 20 minutes left bread in oven turned off for awhileafter testing over 200 before getting out bread still didnot raise as high as yours did but it was above pan tested water heat for yeast etc and bread still fell, i have tried this several times and am abt at my rids end what i could be doing wrong