Sentences with phrase «right people on your side»

In any decision to purchase commercial space make sure you have the right people on your side and involve them at all stages of the decision.

When a sudden and traumatic injury or loss due to someone's negligence impacts your life severely, it's important to have the right people on your side.

Well a big part of that is getting the right people on your side.

Not exact matches

Because most people are right handed, and Americans drive on the right side of the road, most people move through a store from right to left.

Staying on the right side of the law will keep you focused on the business instead of on the people threatening to sue you.

Republicans are faced with a choice — be on the right side of history and stand with the American people who support a free and open internet, or hold hands with the special interests who want to control the internet for their own profit.»

You can meet face to face and connect with your workers right then and there, and you have a better grasp on the «people» side of your business.

This, combined with the fact that America drives on the right, makes people more likely to purchase items on the right - hand side of the aisle.

Total Due Most accounts - receivable forms list this number on the right side of the page, but I'm convinced that people pay the most attention to details listed on the left.

These detours are easier to deal with when you encourage the person on the other side of the table to also smile while finding the right solution.

When you mouse over the right side of the comment and click the x, you will be given several options: highlight it, allow it to be seen, hide it or delete it and ban that person from commenting on your page again.

On the right hand side of the pop - up menu it'll show which people currently like your page or not.

[16:00] Pain + reflection = progress [16:30] Creating a meritocracy to draw the best out of everybody [18:30] How to raise your probability of being right [18:50] Why we are conditioned to need to be right [19:30] The neuroscience factor [19:50] The habitual and environmental factor [20:20] How to get to the other side [21:20] Great collective decision - making [21:50] The 5 things you need to be successful [21:55] Create audacious goals [22:15] Why you need problems [22:25] Diagnose the problems to determine the root causes [22:50] Determine the design for what you will do about the root causes [23:00] Decide to work with people who are strong where you are weak [23:15] Push through to results [23:20] The loop of success [24:15] Ray's new instinctual approach to failure [24:40] Tony's ritual after every event [25:30] The review that changed Ray's outlook on leadership [27:30] Creating new policies based on fairness and truth [28:00] What people are missing about Ray's culture [29:30] Creating meaningful work and meaningful relationships [30:15] The importance of radical honesty [30:50] Thoughtful disagreement [32:10] Why it was the relationships that changed Ray's life [33:10] Ray's biggest weakness and how he overcame it [34:30] The jungle metaphor [36:00] The dot collector — deciding what to listen to [40:15] The wanting of meritocratic decision - making [41:40] How to see bubbles and busts [42:40] Productivity [43:00] Where we are in the cycle [43:40] What the Fed will do [44:05] We are late in the long - term debt cycle [44:30] Long - term debt is going to be squeezing us [45:00] We have 2 economies [45:30] This year is very similar to 1937 [46:10] The top tenth of the top 1 % of wealth = bottom 90 % combined [46:25] How this creates populism [47:00] The economy for the bottom 60 % isn't growing [48:20] If you look at averages, the country is in a bind [49:10] What are the overarching principles that bind us together?

Alternatively, people on the Right side of the quadrant are Business Owners and / or Investors and pay as little as 0 % to 20 % in taxes.

We've always had a history of true toleration of people on various sides, but when you feel that you're morally right, it's very tempting to tell the other person, «Shut up.

A few people in the town took issue with the practice, and the case has been boiling ever since, with both sides saying their religious rights are on the line.

It is adorable though that you have some sympathy for Hitler, I'm sure you're going to fall on the right side of history this time, because for the lat 60 years you've got the shaft, what with the whole wanting to kill people and hating on others.

It might seem strange the people can simultaneously hold both ideas mentioned above; namely, that the poor man represents Jesus Christ on earth, and therefore all the right is on his side, and he is the only one who must be considered; but at the same time, that poverty is a scandal, and we must do our best to get rid of this scandal and to put the poor into a «normal» situation; that is, put an end to poverty.

People within each denomination who support abortion rights and take liberal stances on numerous issues, meanwhile, have formed similar bonds on the Democratic side.

I have no doubt that many of the people who opposed abolition, interracial marriage, protection of indigenous people, black civil rights, women's suffrage, etc. believed wholeheartedly that God was on their side and they were simply being faithful to God's Word.

Projecting devices: «Let me suggest that each person draw a sketch showing where he is «feeling-wise» right now... (Later) On the other side of the paper draw the way you'd like to be a month from now... Tell the group about both.»

You said: «As a Christian, this was a bad idea from the start... basically through the people on the fence about God right over to the non-believers side.

I think it's time for people both inside and outside the religion to take a step back and question what's really going on, if it's okay or not and what we can do to protect the rights of both sides.

Out of the other side of their mouth, people on the right keep screaming, «our government shouldn't be forcing me to help the poor and disabled!»

if you can lie to yourself with immunity, you might be an atheist if you think the indifferent support your side, you might be an atheist if you don't think at all, you might be an atheist if you are drawn to religious discussions thinking someone wants to hear your opinion, you might be an atheist if you copy paste every piece of crap theory you find, you might be an atheist if you think you are right no matter what the evidence shows, you might be an atheist if you can't hold your water when you think about science, you might be an atheist if you can't write the word God, with proper capitalization, you might be an atheist if you think your view has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you think The View has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you live in a tar paper shack, writing manifestos, you might be an atheist if you think you're basically a good person, and your own final authority you might be an atheist if you think your great aunt Tillie was a simian, you might be an atheist if you own an autographed copy of Origin Of The Species, you might be an atheist if you think that when you die you're worm food, you might be an atheist if you think the sun rises and sets for you alone, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is Charles Darwin when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is you when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if you attend a church but palm the offering plate when it passes, you might be an atheist If think this exhausts all the possibilities of definition, you might be an atheist.

In response to the original letter about Christian songs being empty of meaning and causing people to hug and sway, you are right in that it is lop sided on the side of being all happy, happy all the time.

Why can't we all just mind our own business when it comes to peoples bedrooms and wedding albums, neither side get's to preach in schools, though I understand how you would think of it as the atheist getting his way by just not having you preach your God to his children in a publicly funded school, but he's not sending an atheist spokesman to influence your children, he just doesn't feel it's right to allow the religious spokesman into the schools to influence any children on his tax dollar.

Second, generally, when people draw the progress of the spiritual life, they put a cross on the left side, and heaven on the right side, and a squiggly line between the two that goes up and down, hopefully trending upward.

Religious proponents of international law could draw on the prophets for biblical support: Amos, Hosea, Micah and others discerned Yahweh's law as both impartial and international, striking against the arrogant pretensions of all people and nations who violate human rights in the belief that God is on their side.

if bloomeberg admits there are people of goodwill on both sides of this highly emotional issue, then right course is a compromise that mr. patterson is trying.

But a decade later, I've become aware that 12 - step programs are home to people from every religion, denomination, sect, cult, political tilt, gender identity, sexual preference, economic strata, racial and ethnic background, believers in gun rights and abortion rights and the right to home schooling, drinkers of coffee and tea, whiskey and mouthwash, people who sleep on their sides or their stomachs or sidewalks.

Hundreds and thousands of people who have been stripped of all they possess and who have the right entirely on their side will at last be heard.

To take a simple example, people gain the freedom to travel a two - lane road only by giving up one of the lanes — they must always drive on the right side.

You sound just like the people in the dark ages did when they were against civil rights for African Americans and women, you're the one on the wrong side of the moral debate with no facts to back yourselves up.

The vocal insistence of the religious right on biblical «creationism» and such doctrines as the inerrancy of the Bible is likely to create a one - sided impression of the Christian faith and to turn away people who are not aware of other Christian views.

Although Lincoln is often praised for this remark by those who oppose the mixing of religion and politics, it contains three of the most controversial ideas in American politics: that it is legitimate to invoke the name of God within the realm of political discourse; that God's existence isn't merely symbolic, but that he is always right; and that since God takes sides on certain issues, some people will be divinely justified while others will stand in opposition not only to their political opponents but to the very Creator and Sustainer of the Universe.

I guarantee the reason for them... is not just because the few on one side or the other, are so much smarter... and have the right to classify the other billions of people, convenientlly as idiots... or that all religion is imaginary fairy tales or all science is against God or that any of its truths are not in harmony with a higher concept of God.

In the bones of people who lived long lives, one finds arthritic knees, worn right shoulders and bad lower backs, especially on the left side, because everyone worked hard.

And in our country, on colleges, because of the laws of free speach, I can speak to people about anything, but the minute I bring up Christianity, the police have to come by my side and protect my right to free speach because if they were not there, I would be beaten up.

ok, ok, ok, i get it both sides think they are telling the truth there are no lyers here on this blogs only misinform people talking about two separate subjects yet thinking they are talking about the same thing the existence of god... one side believe the other doesn't what's wrong with that... sooner or later they'll changed their minds and one side will believe and the other won't so the arguement will forever be the same about two separate aguement on the same blog... but its definitely entertaining to read the comebacks... keep up the good work you all... its just as fun to read what the believer have to say as to what the nonebeliever have to say... after all it keeps all getting to know eachother better on what we believe right???

The conservative mass of people, recovering from the shock of civil war, acknowledged that Luther might be in the right on many matters but were waiting to see whether, after the war, an excommunicate and an outlaw still had might on his side.

Per is very slow, I wish he was faster atimes but ppl under rate him a lot and please football is not all about pace; Per plays with his brains and we tend to applaud players who play with more aggression unfortunately he doesn't; I will use an eg, if it was Per marking Hazard instead of Koscielny in d build up to the chelsea penalty, he would have probably gone backwards trying to stay on d right side of hazard so he doesn't shoot and narrowing d angle so that our goalie easily picks up d ball, that's how Per plays and to me that's subtle but intelligent option in that scenario but that style of play doesn't get plenty credit.

I considered Sanchez a Walcott replacement and was happy to see Walcott leave after his signing, but he seems to be on the left side most of the time instead of his stronger right flank, so we have people like Ramsey playing out of position to cover for Walcott.

they will need a new Head coach / manager to be able to listen to their opinion since they have been involves them in football but in wenger's case the bucks stop to him which is not right at all Ivan is very intelligent guy like the way he put it «we need new infrastructure» which states we cant have a whole club direction on football side on single person hands those are things of the past and they have been proven for over 10 years not practically working!

«Being back in there, being on the other side, running out the other side of the tunnel, seeing people that I became close with, seeing my family that I can't really much right now because I'm in Oklahoma City — my son, my wife — seeing them, having them be there is very important.

For a long time, there was only one thing people knew when they heard the name Coss Marte: By age 19 he was making $ 2 million a year as a drug kingpin, selling weed and ecstasy and cocaine and crack on the Lower East Side, right around the corner.

I hope people understand now how important is Ramsey on that right side and why Walcott & Ox don't start in that position.

Thats is not his strength, I think you need a person on the right who can bring Sanchez level quality on that side.

Nothing like one underachiever blowing smoke up the ass of another... we know that Ozil has some incredible technical gifts, but to be considered the best you have to bring more than just assists to the table... for me, a top player has to possess a more well - rounded game, which doesn't mean they need to be a beast on both ends of the pitch, but they must have the ability to take their game to another level when it matters most... although he amassed some record - like stats early on, it set the bar too high, so when people expected him to duplicate those numbers each year the pressure seemed to get the best of our soft - spoken star... obviously that's not an excuse for what has happened in the meantime, but it's important to make note of a few things: (1) his best year was a transition year for many of the traditionally dominant teams in the EPL, so that clearly made the numbers appear better than they actually were and (2) Wenger's system, or lack thereof, didn't do him any favours; by playing him out of position and by not acquiring world - class striker and / or right - side forward that would best fit an Ozil - centered offensive scheme certainly hurt his chances to repeat his earlier peformances, (3) the loss of Cazorla, who took a lot of pressure off Ozil in the midfield and was highly efficient when it came to getting him the ball in space, negatively impacted his effectiveness and (4) he likewise missed a good chunk of games and frankly never looked himself when he eventually returned to the field... overall the Ozil experiment has had mixed reviews and rightfully so, but I do have some empathy for the man because he has always carried himself the same way, whether for Real or the German National team, yet he has only suffered any lengthy down periods with Arsenal... to me that goes directly to this club's inability to surround him with the necessary players to succeed, especially for someone who is a pass first type of player; as such, this simply highlights our club's ineffective and antiquated transfer policies... frankly I'm disappointed in both Ozil and our management team for not stepping up when it counted because they had a chance to do something special, but they didn't have it in them... there is no one that better exemplifies our recent history than Ozil, brief moments of greatness undercut by long periods of disappointing play, only made worse by his mopey posturing like a younger slightly less awkward Wenger... what a terribly waste

«Hopefully we get to start a game together and hopefully then we can show people that pace on the right - hand side and obviously just help the team,» Bellerin told Arsenal.com.