Sentences with phrase «right questions rather»

So for now, although this likely sounds obstructionist and noncommittal, I am still most interested in seeking right questions rather than right answers.

Not exact matches

It might sound like I'm talking about marriage rather than business but how you know when you've found the right investor might be answered in part by the questions asked.

«The candidate who knows the space and is really interested in a company rather than just applying for a job will be able to engage with everyone who's interviewing him or her with interesting questions at the right level,» Baszucki says.

For example, The Economist has devoted this entire week to an open, online discussion devoted to the question: «Should businesses work to advance the rights of LGBT people broadly, rather than focusing only on their own employees?»

He wasn't sure what the right answer to that question was, but suggested that shifting more of the burden to other countries would be a start; rather than Americans paying too much, perhaps people in other Western countries are paying too little.

Talli Sperry: That's a really important question we should probably be assessing sooner rather than later, right?

Like all good coaches, Sheldon doesn't tell you what you need to do, but rather asks you the right questions to help you realize what you want to do.

«I actually think the question is more what is the right regulation rather than yes or no, should it be regulated?

The sooner you, the customer, figure this out, the sooner you start asking the right questions, the sooner you will be on your way to buying your own yacht rather than someone else's.

According to Wisdom Meets Passion, the question is not which is right, but rather how can the two work together?

You do comprehend that all Atheist means is without a belief in a god or gods, right??? I'm not the one claiming a god and given that you refuse to answer any questions, it is rather safe to say you're lying about all you claim.

I have gotten rambling a little here but my question to you your thoughts on this statement: «If money or rather the established institution that is the world market, is the reason that throughout at leastthe past few decades, than it would be right to take from those who have much much more than they need and give to those who are at least the poorest of the world, those in need.»

Rather than comment on the transgender issue (and risk being no - platformed forever), I want to reflect on an even more controversial question: Is there a right to offend?

But when it comes to some of these other issues, I don't think the question is «who is right and who is wrong» but rather, «does this interpretation help us look more like Jesus?»

Rather, Satan questioned Jehovah's right to rule.

I think I am pretty much done with the series on Bibliology, and so rather than move right on to Theology Proper where I summarize and question what I have been taught about God (I'm actually scared to begin this), I am going to go back to my other two writing projects for a while.

I really feel for those who are struggling with adultery and it seems the reoccuring question is the same.Will God forgive me if i have committed adultery and the answer is yes we all are sinners and we all have sinned no sin is worse than the other to God.If you are feeling bad because for what you have done then it is the holy spirit drawing you to him repent and turn from your sin.God wants all of us to draw near to him to get our hearts right to stop making the same mistakes over and over again.If you feel weak he gives the strength to deal with it rather than trying sort it out on our own.He forgives us because he loves us but we may have to bear the consequence of our sin like David and his family suffered for his choices regarding his affair with bathsheba but God forgave him for his sin.

I really question if it can be done within the context of church because the goal of church is often the maintainence of being the most right, rather than healing and sustaining people through love, where ever that takes them.

It is rather a «question book» (Cohn Morris), where we go not to find the right answers but to find the right questions — questions we evade at our peril.

Just for the information, I'm a gay man living in a relationship who accepted that he will probably always live in the «maybe» of this question but who decided to live from grace rather than from «being right».

I learnt very quickly that if I had a question or a problem with the church or theology then it would be my problem not theirs, they would turn it around so that I would have to work thru something in my life — I would be at fault and I got to thinking (rather plaintively I might add) «why cant I be right for once?»

Whenever you feel the «urgent» need to jump into a fight over who is right and who is wrong, ask yourself this question: «Would I rather be right, or would I rather be kind?

We'd rather go and buy something we know that the person in question is longing for and tag it with «you know this is for your Birthday (or Christmas,...)» winking and knowing that this makes him / her happy right at that moment.

Me asking why Seo would be preferred to play on the right rather than left got more up votes than down and considering I get down votes for my arrogance... I would not say the question I asked is clear for everyone, or if it is then it is in favor of what I asked.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

personally i do nt need to see trophies, dats not my point, but i do want reassurance that wer moving in the right direction and at the moment our movement is all southwards mate like iv said before im not bashing wenger the sales / buys are facts since 03 and id rather do raise my questions and worries here in july rather than others who will be lookin for blood in december

In math: rather than a grading scale, ask students how many questions they believe they need to get right in order to feel they've mastered a particular skill.

Leaders are trained to listen and to ask more questions rather than judging what's right for you.

Whether they're right, or whether the doctor was right to pressure them is a rather complicated question.

They take your question at face value and think they have a choice to say, «No, I really would rather not go to bed right now.»

I attribute my ignorance not to his evasiveness but to my own deficiencies as an investigative reporter (Woodward and Bernstein, I'm not), the fact that he and I were essentially having a friendly chat rather than a hard core audit of his books (to which he probably wouldn't have consented at any rate), and the fact that I come to such an interview with only a layperson's understanding of the financial side of running a school food program and probably didn't know all the right questions to ask.

Although Conaghan doesn't cover its development, I don't believe the structure was necessarily wrong but it did perhaps spend too much time looking at rights of the consumer, rather than asking some of the more fundamental questions about the stability of financial institutions here and in different parts of the world.

The rather unexpected rise of the euro sceptic and national - conservative alternatives for Germany, namely the (AfD) might be a serious opponent to the CDU / CSU on the political right, challenging the CDU / CSU not to abandon all of its socially - conservative positions and questioning its recent rapprochement towards the centre - left.

Sunder, I think Denham posed the right question - how do we win people over to the cause of equality rather than just preach at them?

An example that is particularly relevant since the question alludes to the use of the criminal justice system to enforce property rights is that in Germany and some Nordic countries, they punish many less serious criminal offenses with «day - fines» rather than incarceration.

The question is rather focused on how a «democratic» system shapes, and how a «process of democratization» can guarantee the right democratic government.

If that is right - others will have read the reports more closely, so am open to correction on this - then plaudits to the HIMC but also the question of why parliamentary scrutiny should fall quite far short of what we might reasonably expect, (and despite some rather effective evidence gathering particularly by the LibDem parliamentarians).

Setting up your question with the assumption that libetarians are «right» suggests that this question is more about pushing your point of view rather than seeking an answer.

If it takes you this long to make up your mind about something so fundamental and you still have questions, then surely the right option is to stay with what you know, rather than risk our economy and security with a leap in the dark.

«Teachers, parents and the public would be right to question why Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister, is not insisting these provisions are restored now rather than making them a manifesto commitment.»

Whether you consider the press hostile to Donald Trump or hostile to the USA is largely a question of your cultural upbringing and voter persuasion but a case to suggest Breitbart is a better custodian of Democratic First amendment rights rather than the BBC or the New York Times is nonexistent.

«Right,» Cameron said under his breath, rather hoarsely, as the prelude to yet another question.

Rather, it has simply been a question of refocusing its recruitment efforts and «taking more time to recruit the right person.»

The question is, would we rather have this development happen in reasonably well - regulated environments where authorities are at least somewhat accountable to the public, or are we happy to let countries with more questionable human rights records and even more opaque power structures take the lead?

Rather i have a question that i fart to max when i sleep during the night especially as and when i change the side from left to right or vice versa... So your reply will help me understand the problem...

Whenever you feel the «urgent» need to jump into a fight over who is right and who is wrong, ask yourself this question: «Would I rather be right, or would I rather be kind?»

Party occasionally but would rather watch movies with some friends... there's more to me, but you got ta ask the right questions

(It's perhaps worth noting here that the rights to the Deadpool character are owned by 20th Century Fox, so he inhabits the same super-verse as the X-Men, rather than that of the Avengers et al.) What Wade doesn't know is that the procedure in question involves his being tortured to the brink of death for weeks (months?)

Vatra Games are quite within their rights to do that, but it raises the question — at what point does it start to become its own world rather than the one expected in a Silent Hill title?

Chuck has questions about how Stephen always seems to be in the right place at the right time to capture his stranger - than - fiction scoops, but with everyone so enraptured by Stephen's work, Chuck looks like a jealous colleague rather than a journalist following his natural instincts.