Sentences with phrase «right side of the dispute»

Whether in Calgary, Edmonton or outside of those two major urban centres, roughly four - in - five Albertans say their government is on the right side of the dispute.

Not exact matches

Kerrisdale Park is definitely the right side of the tracks, but residents were dismayed earlier this year when CP Rail announced that, after 15 years of dispute with the City of Vancouver, it would again begin routing trains through the Arbutus Corridor, which bounds this neighbourhood on its North and West sides.

The right - back is currently in a major dispute with the German side, and reports had claimed that he was sacked after violating the club's code of conduct.

If the «creditor» claims to have solid evidence of the debt but the «debtor» disputes that, the reporting agency will not attempt to determine who is right, but will give both sides a chance to state their case for anyone reading the report.

See related: Know your rights: Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, The ugly side of debt collection, Survey: Debt collection calls growing more frequent, aggressive, How to dispute credit report errors

Every deal starts with the best of intentions on both sides of the Contract, but failure to agree appropriate business terms in advance can often lead to disputes that could have been avoided with the right advice from the outset.

First of all, you must have the right attorneys on both sides of the dispute.

No matter which side of the dispute you are on and how much is at stake, you can never have enough knowledge of your legal rights and available choices.

The firm also handles cases involving commercial, business, and insurance disputes, borrower - side loan litigation and arbitration, employment discrimination and discharges, unpaid overtime, governmental liability, civil rights, and a wide variety of civil disputes.

First of all, you must have the right attorneys on both sides of the dispute.

In summary, the collaborative divorce process can be a wonderful means of resolving divorce disputes without giving up the right to have a lawyer involved in each step of the process (having your lawyer by your side as you negotiate with your spouse).

The lawyers employ the adversarial process, where each side in a dispute has the right to present its case as persuasively as possible, subject to the rules of evidence, and a judge decides the outcome.

So, what the learned, but possibly biased (remember, the 50/50 rule pro or con here) Judge has publicly stated as reasoning for the continuance of Dale's suit is, in «my» own words, that... «In my mind (according to how I personally see things in my own biased mind (I am human after all) from my own psychological / political perspective re how I want to apply the wording of the law in this particular case), Mr. Dale has the «legal» right to continue with his lawsuit because I, being the sole judge of the presented facts and tactics of persuasion as presented by both sides in this dispute, side with Mr. Dale more so than with TREB and CREA for the following reason (s):