Sentences with phrase «right to free speech because»

Tom and Ron, 18, attending the protest, told our reporter: «They [the BNP] don't get to use their democratic right to free speech because that's exactly what they want to take away from other people.

F forcing them along these lines violates their right to free speech because it mandates a behavior, by the Greens, which they conscientiously object to.

Americans will be to scared to exercise there right to free speech because today is the day we lost it america sleep well.

Besides, are you suggesting that we suppress anyone's right to free speech because if you are than you need to move to one of these bass ackward countries where a less than middle school quality production of a total farce can insight people to act as a pack of rabid dogs blaming America for why they live in dirt... We are LUCKY and BLESSED to live in a land where we can smile and walk away from an opinion that we disagree with... that South Park can but Jesus in a boxing ring against Satan and depict Moses as a glowing spinning dreidl... and these nutcases want to burn and pillage because one lunatic makes a childish and stupid play on videotape?

Not exact matches

> I agree with Richard some people just because they profess there faith doesn't mean there trying to push there beliefs on anyone people of faith have a right to free speech also.

So many people who advocate or speak publicly for political or personal reasons aren't acknowledged as much when it comes to religion when someone is wanting to speak out about there faith a light bulb goes off and says we don't want to hear, or talk, or, air any thing that has to do with the mentioning of God but because of the high profile story and because this is the President of the United States it's ok hats off to them for not being ashamed to speak about there faith I agree with Richard some people just because they profess there faith doesn't mean there trying to push there beliefs on anyone people of faith have a right to free speech also.

Corporations are people and have free speech rights, so businesses should be able to deny services to gays because of their beliefs, but if another corporation doesn't want to enter into a business venture because they found out their future partners are anti-gay bigots that is somehow wrong?

Because we have the right to free speech here in the U.S. means that we should be and act responsibly with this right, otherwise... you might get someone killed.

Third, free speech ought not be absolutized because the First Amendment basically protects, not the right of the press to speak, but the right of every citizen to know.

«So, I didn't stand locked in arms, I knelt today, because I wanted to make it clear that our rights to free speech and protest in America can not be muted by the president.»

We uphold the ideal of free speech on reddit as much as possible not because we are legally bound to, but because we believe that you - the user - has the right to choose between right and wrong, good and evil, and that it is your responsibility to do so.

Teachout said she «disagrees» with Cuomo's order this month banning business with pro-BDS companies because, «as a strong advocate for the First Amendment right to free speech, I will stand up for the right of any group to share its views, even when I disagree with it.»

While its obvious that former Vice President Atiku Abubakar respects the rights of free speech, I don't think he believes that such rights should exceed the boundary of reason, because every right exists in relation to other rights.

All children must be guaranteed that right, they argued, because education equips citizens to fully enjoy their free speech and voting rights.

Yet, because of laws that favor powerful unions and «labor peace» over the rights of individuals, millions of public school teachers have lost their rights to free speech and free association.

My initial free - speech interest in this case was a personal one: I have the right to say what I said about Mann, because it happens to be true.

In spite of the tyrant's commands and because they had put their lives on the line to defend their rights, the patriots enshrined free speech in our founding documents; the same documents that gave you your job.

Because most meteorologists are employed directly or indirectly by governement and academia, they are all to often intimidated with retaliation and denied the right to exercise free speech to combat the hijacking fof the profession, their professional associations, and the science by a minority of political activists inside and outside their profession, who have promoted their likeminded collaborationists into positions of leadership.

~ Turning to my own current preoccupation, readers and commentators assume that I see the Mann vs Steyn trial as a free speech case simply because I think I have the right to say what I said about his «fraudulent» hockey stick.

It would not be feasible (or consistent with free speech values) to give people the right to force newspapers — or, say, gossip blogs — to erase non-defamatory content about themselves, simply because it paints them in a less - than - positive light..

This was a milestone in English - American legal tradition, because it not only established the power of the jury to find whatever verdict it wishes, without punishment, but also the rights of free speech and peaceable assembly.

Handlarski, principal of RH Criminal Defence, says there's a «problem» in society with people claiming they have the right to restrict free speech because they feel unsafe.

In short, the Task Force offers a mix of greater restriction of those who appear to abuse the right of free speech, a mechanism for «positive» organized debate and a nicer environment for the students (although one wonders whether those who have no qualms about verbally beating down those who think differently from them will be persuaded to become genteel debaters because they have more space to engage in their activities).

The campaign, dubbed «Consortium for Audiovisual Free Expression» (CAFE), emphasized that music fans should not be forced to relinquish important rights like fair use and free speech because others fear they will abuse those rigFree Expression» (CAFE), emphasized that music fans should not be forced to relinquish important rights like fair use and free speech because others fear they will abuse those rigfree speech because others fear they will abuse those rights.

What you are saying makes no more sense than saying that because state constitutions protect free speech, the constitutional right to free speech «would never come up.»

Because no right, from free speech to private property, is absolute.