Of course, your loved one also has
the right to live without fear and to transfer to a different nursing home or living arrangement if she is unhappy, uncomfortable, or unsafe.
Children have
right to live without fear of climate change and can sue US government, judge rules
Not exact matches
«As a company that is committed
to the principle that everyone deserves
to live without fear of discrimination simply for being who they are, becoming an employer in North Carolina, where members of our teams will not have equal
rights under the law, is simply untenable,» Schulman wrote in an open letter.
Imagine if you were going through
life right now
without someone
to lean on and love, do your best not
to take it for granted.
The visas may be popular with high everyone from Microsoft
to New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, but they aren't completely
without critics, who contend that the program drives down wages and can be exploitative
to visa holders who are dependent on their companies for their
right to live in the country.
This approach recognizes that Americans have an equal
right to clean air and water, no matter where they
live, and allows states
to compete for business
without having
to sacrifice public health or environmental quality.
These instant notifications can use the phone's GPS as well, meaning you're occasionally notified that someone nearby is interested in meeting you
right now — it's almost like real
life,
without the risk of face -
to - face rejection.
Squatters
living in a tent on the golf course because they somehow feel,
without evidence, that they have a
right to live there runs counter
to American entrepreneurship.
Right now, a host who
lives in a unit full - time can rent out spare beds
without restriction in San Francisco, and an absent host can do it up
to 90 days a year.
According
to the Human
Rights Campaign, more than 200 «anti-LGBTQ bills» were introduced across the country in 2016 sessions - most failing
to pass - and more than 111 million people
live in states
without clear state - level protections against LGBTQ workplace discrimination.
(a) Schedule 2.7 (a) of the Disclosure Schedule contains a list setting forth each employee benefit plan, program, policy or arrangement (including any «employee benefit plan» as defined in Section 3 (3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended («ERISA»)(«ERISA Plan»)-RRB-, including,
without limitation, employee pension benefit plans, as defined in Section 3 (2) of ERISA, multi-employer plans, as defined in Section 3 (37) of ERISA, employee welfare benefit plans, as defined in Section 3 (1) of ERISA, deferred compensation plans, stock option plans, bonus plans, stock purchase plans, fringe benefit plans,
life, hospitalization, disability and other insurance plans, severance or termination pay plans and policies, sick pay plans and vacation plans or arrangements, whether or not an ERISA Plan (including any funding mechanism therefore now in effect or required in the future as a result of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or otherwise), whether formal or informal, oral or written, under which (i) any current or former employee, director or individual consultant of the Company (collectively, the «Company Employees») has any present or future
right to benefits and which are contributed
to, sponsored by or maintained by the Company or (ii) the Company or any ERISA Affiliate (as hereinafter defined) has had, has or may have any actual or contingent present or future liability or obligation.
Many factors could cause BlackBerry's actual results, performance or achievements
to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward - looking statements, including,
without limitation: BlackBerry's ability
to enhance its current products and services, or develop new products and services in a timely manner or at competitive prices, including risks related
to new product introductions; risks related
to BlackBerry's ability
to mitigate the impact of the anticipated decline in BlackBerry's infrastructure access fees on its consolidated revenue by developing an integrated services and software offering; intense competition, rapid change and significant strategic alliances within BlackBerry's industry; BlackBerry's reliance on carrier partners and distributors; risks associated with BlackBerry's foreign operations, including risks related
to recent political and economic developments in Venezuela and the impact of foreign currency restrictions; risks relating
to network disruptions and other business interruptions, including costs, potential liabilities, lost revenues and reputational damage associated with service interruptions; risks related
to BlackBerry's ability
to implement and
to realize the anticipated benefits of its CORE program; BlackBerry's ability
to maintain or increase its cash balance; security risks; BlackBerry's ability
to attract and retain key personnel; risks related
to intellectual property
rights; BlackBerry's ability
to expand and manage BlackBerry ® World ™; risks related
to the collection, storage, transmission, use and disclosure of confidential and personal information; BlackBerry's ability
to manage inventory and asset risk; BlackBerry's reliance on suppliers of functional components for its products and risks relating
to its supply chain; BlackBerry's ability
to obtain
rights to use software or components supplied by third parties; BlackBerry's ability
to successfully maintain and enhance its brand; risks related
to government regulations, including regulations relating
to encryption technology; BlackBerry's ability
to continue
to adapt
to recent board and management changes and headcount reductions; reliance on strategic alliances with third - party network infrastructure developers, software platform vendors and service platform vendors; BlackBerry's reliance on third - party manufacturers; potential defects and vulnerabilities in BlackBerry's products; risks related
to litigation, including litigation claims arising from BlackBerry's practice of providing forward - looking guidance; potential charges relating
to the impairment of intangible assets recorded on BlackBerry's balance sheet; risks as a result of actions of activist shareholders; government regulation of wireless spectrum and radio frequencies; risks related
to economic and geopolitical conditions; risks associated with acquisitions; foreign exchange risks; and difficulties in forecasting BlackBerry's financial results given the rapid technological changes, evolving industry standards, intense competition and short product
life cycles that characterize the wireless communications industry.
@ jack3 no you have the
right to believe what ever you want, but we might mock you for believing in something that has talking snakes, a story about the world flooding and being able
to fit all the animals on the planet on one boat, that believes in magic, that believes a person
lived in the belly of a whale, and that people coexisted with dinosaurs all
without any actual proof.
Jesus said; I will show you my faith by my works: Faith
without works is dead: (There is no
life) = If we have the Faith of Christ (a gift from God) then we will have the works that go with it that is evident of our faith; the works will testify
to our faith, then do we produce fruit that will remain: If our heart does not convict us
to do what is
right according the written word, then we are not in faith: Our hearts are far from the
life of Words of our Lord penetrating into our hearts because our hearts are wicked; even Paul who said; follow me as I am of Christ; how was that??? In and by the Holy Spirit, even Spirit of truth as Paul takes us through the Words of the Lord
to have us established in the truth: The Word of our Lord is as refined silver, 7 times in the fire: Jesus is the author and finisher of our faith,
to them who believe: In the Bible one's «belief» and one's «behavior» are often compared.
By framing abortion as a nearly unqualified constitutional
right,
without fully considering the claims of fetal
life, we have not taken a stride
to a more virtuous society.
In both instances the sexual revolution asserts that we have a «
right»
to the mode of
life of our choosing
without regard
to our bodies.
I agree with L.Nielsen's sentiment that you are «almost there» — close
to realising that this is the only
life you have and that all your effort should be directed at
living it well for it's own sake, close
to realising that you are strong enough as an individual
to face the world
without the psychological crutch you call god, close
to realising that you are a good human being in your own
right, close
to realising that your own successes, failures, loves and fears are yours and yours alone, not attibutable
to an imaginary creator.
Its a sad day when our young black men do nt have the freedom
to walk through certain neighborhoods
without being harrased are mudered, no one has the
right to just take a
life just because of the color of your skin we as a people has
to stand up
to injustices such as this no one wants
to hear the truth there is still a racial devide in America and our justice system create laws so that this kind of injustice can continue
to happen rather u want
to admit it are not our young black men are the prey.
Many successful atheist writers
lived long
lives without violent deaths: Arthur C. Clark — 91 yrs.; Kurt Vonnegut — 85; Robert Heinlein — 82; James Randi, still going at 82; and many others that I don't have time
to look up
right now.
If we are
right, then we
lived our
lives to their fullest in intellectual honesty,
without the fear of some tyrant getting their hands on us after we die, and
without having taken some stupid stand against the validity of sound science, or basic human
rights.
Oh, so in the vast known Universe, which reaches out for 15 BILLION light years in all directions, with over 100 BILLION galaxies, containing an average of 100 BILLION stars each, with most of those stars now thought
to have multiple planets orbiting around them, you can't imagine that there would be at least ONE little planet SOMEWHERE with the
right conditions for
life without divine intervention?
But if it is true for a person, such as I,
without a womb, then it is equallly true of women, that they, too, have inalienable
rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
So the real questions are: 1) how can there even be a universal understanding of «
right» and «wrong»
without a creator 2) how can purely random genetic mutations preserved by natural selection have resulted in the desire
to do «
right» even amongst those that do not believe in
life after death?
Theresa keep what you were doing when you reached out
to the homeless lady that was the
right thing
to do that was motivated by the holy spirit do nt follow what the church does do what the Lord wants you
to do and it will bear fruit.Let them do there thing you just keep following the Lord and listen
to him in your heart and let him lead you.People do things for different reasons
to please others for power
to be seen
to do the
right thing all those are the wrong reasons they are just dead works
without the Lord we can do nothing.Dont let others turn you away from what the Lord wants you
to do its him we need
to please always.Be encouraged that the Lord used you
to touch a
life that is awesome.And do nt take the rejection personally because its not you they are pushing away it is the Lord the yare not listening
to him but doing wha tthey want
to do it will bear no fruit.May the Lord bless you and your family in your ministry step out in faith and trust him he will not disappoint you because he is with you.
Without God, we are torn in two directions: universities praise diversity, but students still form cliques; politicians promise a bright future, but our news programmes are distressing; people are obsessed with scientific explanations of everything, and equally obsessed with the sentimental love expressed in pop songs; sexual abuse with a minor is the most shameful of all crimes, but everyone has a
right to complete sexual liberation once they reach the age of consent; we relocate all over the world, preferring
to live anywhere but home, yet we still agonise over our local sports club; we own many things, and still feel we don't have enough; we believe in discipline at school or at work, but we all have a
right to «let ourselves go» at the weekend; we tolerate everything, except people that don't agree with us.
It is in the best interest of this country
to do so, the Government realizes that, and since they can make laws
to make it easier for people
to do so,
without infringing on your
right to live your
life the way you want, it makes sense for them
to make that law.
Yes, citizens have a
right to know «about the people who poisoned their
lives»
without being mired in a near - industrialized settling of old scores in «games organized by the Great Lustrator.»
Non-Muslims who
live in the community in cooperation and peace are looked upon by Islam as equal
to Muslims, each of them holding
to his faith and preaching its aims with wisdom and friendly argument
without bringing pressure
to bear on anyone or encroaching on each other's
rights.
Unguarded, we pry into one another's
lives without having earned the
right to do so.
I've found my people
without the striving and organizing,
without the Official Sanctioned Church Programs, nope, we just all came into each other's
lives,
right at the time when we were meant
to be there, we stayed open
to finding each other, a part of me was always watching for the hints of my people, and so when I found them, I recognised them, I did.
And then yesterday, months, years, a lifetime, and today, into this new
life without fear, I found myself in a room full of women, women I had never met in real
life, and I loved them,
right to Oklahoma and California and Maryland and between.
Nor has any case been made, in the political arena, that it is morally
right to take one's own
life —
without which it is rather strange
to find ourselves saying that it is
right to take or help take the
life of another.
But I think that
to go on
to create
life without intervening (ie place the
right chemicals within lipid bubbles
to create cells) may require a ton of random chance, and could take a lab the size of the ocean, and about a half a billion years
to work.
What about those of us who want
to do what is
right and help others, who
live moral
lives all
without needing your god?
Even when it's a matter of
life and death, our laws do not compel someone
to do something with her body against her will
without infringing on the
rights guaranteed by the Const i tuition.
this just shows that the world is getting weirder by the day... the pope is
right, the world is experiencing amnesia nowadays... people especially in the west tends
to have this amnesia coz they believe that they can
live without God... they believe that they do nt need Him coz, they still able
to survive... BUT what they do nt realize what these are all temporary... just look at the crisis going on
right now... maybe God is still a mystery coz only FAITH can conquer mystery... can anybody out there lead me
to any person who can create simply a tree, a true
living tree... we know for sure that there are some who can create furnitures out from a tree... im really bothered that the world will end sooner than later... GOD FORBIDS... history just keeps on repeating itself... what a pity for the small children and the coming generation...
Since he can't seperate Obama's theology from his philosophy (and he home schools his children, obviously
without a dictionary), what gives this idiot the
right to dictate
to people on how they will conduct their
lives.
These serious, excellent, upright, deeply sensitive people who are still Christian from the very heart: they owe it
to themselves
to try for once the experiment of
living for some length of time
without Christianity; they owe it
to their faith in this way for once
to sojourn «in the wilderness» — if only
to win for themselves the
right to a voice on the question whether Christianity is necessary.»
John Paul II's approach
to east central Europe was based on different premises: that the post-war division of Europe was immoral and historically artificial; that communist violations of basic human
rights had
to be named for what they were; and that the «captive nations» could eventually find tools of resistance that communism could not match, if they reclaimed the religious, moral, and cultural truth about themselves and
lived those truths
without fear.
Children have their «just
rights» within a family, and excessive domination by their parents is neither good psychology nor good religion; yet the undisciplined child suffers severely from his lack of restraint, and
without some coercion there can be no «harmonious relation of
life to life.»
Originally (about two years ago), I wanted
to have at least something posted on every chapter of the Bible before the site went
live, so that anybody could contribute and / or post their insights on any passage of Scripture
right away
without having
to wait for me
to get
to it.
Tim i found it liberating
to just do what the Lord wants you
to do i work within his boundarys and yes i attend church and enjoy it.I love the people and i love hearing the word and worshipping the Lord even if others are still bound up with traditions thats not my walk thats theres.My focus is
to do what the Lord wants me
to do.There have been times i have said no
to the pastor he does nt understand why i choose not
to lead the worship.i query him as well regarding the idea that its not just performing a function because there is a need our hearts have
to be in the
right place so that the Lord can use us but he did nt understand where i was coming from and thats okay because of that i just said no until my heart is
right i am better not being involved in leading.But i am happy
to be an encouragement
to others in the worship team i havent wanted
to be the leader i have done that in the past.So my focus has been just the singing and being part of different worship teams i think the Lord has other plans as the groups i am in seem
to be changing at the same time i am aware that i do nt
to worry about change as the Lord knows whats best.I used
to be quite comfortable leading the music but that was before when i was operating in my own self confidence and pride.The Lord did such a huge change in my
life that i lost my self confidence and that is not a bad thing at all as my spiritual growth has been incredible.The big change was my identity moved from me and what i could do
to knowing who i was in Christ and that he is my strength and confidence.Now i know that
without him i can do nothing in fact i am dependent on his empowerment through his holy spirit all the time in everything.In the weekend i was asked
to lead the music at another church i attend multiple churchs although i attend two regularly one has services in the morning and one has services in the evening so the two do nt really clash.In the weekend i was asked
to lead the music its been two years since i did that and i was worried on how i would go.All i can say is that it went really well and because i stepped out in Faith the Lord really blessed the morning
to the congregation.The difference is knowing that i serve the Lord with the gifts he has given me but my heart has
to be
right and when i do it in his way it builds up the body and it brings glory
to him.May the Lord continue
to show you what he wants you
to do even though others may not understand your reasons i just want you
to know that you do nt have
to pull away completely just work within the boundarys that the Lord gives you and do nt feel pressured by others expectations
to do anything that feel uncomfortable.Be involved just as you feel lead by the holy spirit even if it is in a very minor way take small steps.regards brentnz
Grant us the courage
to defend it,
life,
without which no other
rights are secure.
Obviously it's ridiculous — atheists have very good morals because of an emphasis on empathy, and a lot of our philosophy is based on the knowledge that this is our one and only
life so you'd better
live it
right, but I can understand why it's incredibly disturbing
to someone who literally can not imagine
life without religious belief.
The principle claims that «a people» has the
right to determine its destiny and the disposition of the land upon which it
lives without the intervention of outside parties.
Jesus Christ, is and it will be forever more the unique object lesson of
living, the human being not ever, although we may be Christians we don't leave of
to sin, for the very her writing she says Aerquémonos confiadamente at the throne of your handsomeness in order
to reach forgiving in order
to the perpetual help, in as much as not tenemos one God which not it can feel pity for of we, rather one which fué tempting all over, but
without sin, according
to the letter at the age of Hebrews, and the apostle John she says, whether various hubiere sin, solicitor tenemos in order
to with the parent
to Jesus Christ the that's
right, not ever not any human being it will be the best object lesson not other than The Christ Jesus, nor Buddah bo Mahoma nor none, we don't follow
to humanity rather at a God which fué tempting all over but
without sin, not ever we owe put her scope in the humanity not other than in the.
Jeremy i believe you are on the
right track my take is slightly different but we end up in the same place if we look at the story we see the cross portrayed the condemned sinner judgement for sin condemnation and death Jesus the son of God intervenes on her behalf and forgives her and gives
life restoration and the chance for her
to start again
without guilt or condemnation.That summs up our
life storys.
Natural law is the bridge, so
to speak, for Jews who want
to leave the ghetto
without becoming so assimilated that they abandon their religion: «What a natural law perspective does for Jews at this level is
to enable them
to make
rights claims, but
without having
to adopt the type of all «embracing secularism that is antithetical
to the covenantal basis of traditional Jewish
life and thought.»
The Christians of Thessalonika are
to observe decent self - control in sexual relations,
to respect the
rights of others,
to do their best
to love their neighbors, and
to be honest and industrious so as
to maintain a reasonable standard of
living without having
to keep appealing for charity (like some Christian communities which Paul knew too well).
Consequently, political leaders and military men continue
to advocate these new weapons of mass destruction
without regard
to their incompatibility with the international law of human
rights, let alone the norms of civilized
life on this planet.