Sentences with phrase «right to the point without»

I agree as well that the offer of eternal life is the main point, and you can get right to the point without spending too much time on sin.

Because getting right to the point without first having established some level of comfort does not come naturally to me, I have found that up - front planning prior to the business contact is crucial.

She is confident, purposeful, and gets right to the point without getting distracted along the way.

You know that the best sales pitches get right to the point without wandering off topic and losing the audience.

Not exact matches

That gets right to the point of what you discovered in your reporting, without pretending to be above the fray and reporting what powerful, self - interested «sources» tell you as if it is the gospel?

Kruzel points to Facebook as an example of what can happen when friends start a venture that becomes wildly successful without articulating rights and ownership.

«Much of the tiring pre-purchase journey, which ranges from finding what you're looking for at the right price point to customer support and checkout, can actually be fully automated with the help of a personal A.I. shopping assistant without any human intervention,» said Friedman.

At some point, provided that dividend is safe and investors are convinced it is going to be maintained, the dividend yield on the stock itself is going to be so attractive that it brings in buyers from the sidelines, people who otherwise can not stand to see the yield right there in front of them without doing something about it.

Because of this point, consumers are granted — by the credit bureaus — the right to shop for a mortgage with an unlimited number of lenders without fears of «multiple credit dings».

So, let's just get right to the point here without wasting any

If you're tired of flying economy and want to fly Business or First Class (without paying crazy amounts of cash), you need to earn the right type of points, and then use them in a smart way!

Once historical studies have pointed us in the right direction, however, it is actually quite easy to sketch (in a very loose and general way) the epistemological absurdity of the attempt to found knowledge without the transcendental final cause that is God.

Certainly, Pope Leo XIII's great encyclical, Rerum novarum, was pretty clear, at one point arguing that the government should come to the aid of families only as a last resort: «True, if a family finds itself in exceeding distress, utterly deprived of the counsel of friends, and without any prospect of extricating itself, it is right that extreme necessity be met by public aid...».

They believe that environmental ethics, rightly understood, points to an alternative discipline and an alternative way of thinking in its own right: one that recognizes without equivocation the radical interconnectedness, and the equal value, of all beings.

Also, the point David was making about rights was that the more conservative denominations enjoy the right to be welcomed and affirmed without question, while this is often not the case with LGBT people.

Thirteen governments [of the original states] thus founded on the natural authority of the people alone, without a pretence of miracle or mystery, and which are destined to spread over the northern part of that whole quarter of the globe, are a great point gained in favor of the rights of mankind.

The programme would be greatly strengthened at this point if this was to be made clear, together with the fact that there is no moral right to such counselling, let alone counselling of children without parental knowledge and consent.

They include the «chilling effects» of libel suits, the perennial conflicts between property and access, the three out of four publishers who intervene in news decisions affecting their local markets, the advertisers» freedom to move their money to where their interests are, industry self - regulation in broadcasting and advertising, the backlash against conveying under duress (as in a hostage crisis) points of view that are never aired as directly without duress, the flareups of book banning and censorship of textbooks, the rout of the civil rights movement, the retreat from principles of fairness and equality (even where never implemented), the attack on scientific and humane teaching, the threat of self - appointed media watchdogs to also spy on teachers in the classroom, and the general vigor of ancient orthodoxies masquarading as neo-this and neo-that.

In some cases, as was pointed out in Chapter 10, an absolute right to speak could actually subvert and defeat the democratic process, such as the «right» of an advertiser to misinform the public, or the «right» of a broadcaster to attack someone without allowing an opportunity for that person to reply.

As we pointed out in Chapter 8, we can consider each other to be wrong without necessarily impugning the validity of the other's religious beliefs, if their beliefs lead to right relation with God and people.

lol, yes clay i am an atheist... i created the sun whorshipping thing to have argument against religion from a religious stand point... however, the sun makes more sense then something you can't see or feel — the sun also gives free energy... your god once did that for the jews, my gives it to the human race as well as everything else on the planet, fuk even the planet is nothing without the sun... but back to your point — yes it is very hypocritical of me, AND thats the point, every religious person i have ever met has and on a constant basis broken the tenets of there faith without regard for there souls — it seems to only be the person's conscience that dictates what is right and wrong... the belief in a god figure is just because its tradition to and plus every else believes so its always to be part of the group instead of an outsider — that is sadly human nature to be part of the group.

The Bible points out, he went on, that there will be a day «when you can't buy or sell without the Mark of the Beast, you have to be part of that world system and a very, very few can escape because right now they can go down into the bush in the darkest Africa and hunt you down.»

@Christine «You might want to add to your list of rebuttal points that it's crazy to think that our ability to translate and interpret the bible without bias is somehow greater than our ability to tell right from wrong on our own.»

I got the idea for the sauce from Lindsay's new cookbook — her almond sauce though (for 2 servings) calls for 1/2 a cup of sesame oil (I need to ask her if that is right, because that's a lot of oil and sesame oil can be very overpowering) which would have meant the sauce in her dish would be 17 points per serving, without the food included.

(For your data points, I live in Pennsylvania, which, according to wikipedia, should be right in the middle of ramps country, and I've never seen them at my local food co-op (or at the normal grocery stores, but that goes without saying).)

All Arsenal fans are up in arms about the Gunners dropping two points at Norwich yesterday, and even worse we have sustained three more injuries to key players that we can ill afford to do without right now.

Reading through the lines on AW, s press conformance yesterday, i think he hinted without realizing and said «Arsenal will decide when Sanchez can leave and that he still has 16 months on his contract» this means to me that if Sanchez wants to go to another EPL team they will make him sit on the bench for the whole of the next season, my opinion they will be right to do so even if it means losing 25/30 million to prove a point

Maybe not right now, but at some points during the season because he's going to have moments like Leicester again... And that's absolutely fine, it's part of his journey and he'll be world class by the time he's 25 - 26 even without playing every single game this season.

i really loved it and the fans in the stadium have shown that they will love and stop being quiet if they see that the team fights for it and to the «fans» on here who always repeated that they are happy as long as the tactic and the teams fight and mentality is on point i hope you keep your word and credit wenger and the eleven who are playing right now, show to sanchez and özil what you can do without them, COYG

The Whippets (3rd XV) went without a Varsity Match — Cambridge were unable to raise a men's 3rd team — but at least took «Town» bragging rights with an exciting 34 points to 17 victory over Oxford Brookes 2nd XV at Iffley Road.

In a two - point stance, he lost the explosive get - off that he generated out of a three - point stance and without that head start, so to speak, it was much harder for him to beat right tackles around the corner.

No one revels in our losing no one and to suggest it is just stupid beyond belief... It's been 12 f ****** years without a sniff at the title thats getting close to the worst run in the modern era... I.e. Post 1966... The point is wenger refuses to address longstanding gaps and weaknesses in squad by suggesting the spirit is good or cohesion is right or youngsters about to come good or his bargain basement purchases from ligue I are hidden gems... it's become tiring and time he should join the pensioner ranks and leave this job to someone with a bit of ambition..

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

At some point before Woj's Juventus career comes to an end I'll be able to spell his name without having to look it up to make sure I got it right, too.

Even without the pressure of the fear of the sack, however, as much as Heckingbottom says the right things, he needs to start winning matches to be taken seriously by the Leeds faithful at this point.

It could have worked, but I think Song is too slow a player, and Jack is too inexperienced (right now) right now to use the new system without costing us points this season.

Dad walked around all day with an inflammed and ready to burst appendix without thinking much of it until it was right at the point of bursting and went to his GP.

They argue for a woman's right to breastfeed without interference and point out that breastfeeding is a focal point of infant health and a vital aspect of motherhood.

On the other hand, re-education through labour (RETL)(laojiao (劳教)-RRB-, a draconian detention programme, has long been a focal point for critics of China's human rights record, whereby China's police can sentence an individual to three years (with a possible 4th year extension) in a labour camp without a trial

There is no doubt that, as Tim Farron recently pointed out, no one in their right mind would have interpreted a 52 per cent to 48 per cent win by the remain camp as licence for the government of the day to force through a «hard / clean remain» by joining the Euro or Schengen without another referendum.

My hon. Friend is right to point out that it has done so - without any significant redundancy - by deleting needless posts.

Ozekhome also pointed out that the continuing detention of Suswam without recourse to Court or due process of law constitutes a violation of his fundamental human rights guaranteed under Section 35 (1)(c) and (4) and 44 (1) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) and is therefore illegal and unconstitutional.

A human rights lawyer, Mr. Fred Agbaje, also said Imam was wrong, pointing out that nobody, including, herdsmen, was allowed by the law to carry any kind of weapon without being licensed.

As the New Statesman's George Eaton has pointed out, 35 per cent was enough to deliver victory to Labour in 2005 — and that was with the Lib Dems on 22 per cent, and without a split vote on the right.

Without those components, the mission wouldn't have been able to point its instruments in the right direction to collect data, or point its antennae back at Earth to return the data.

Push your upper body off the ground with that right arm (hips are your point of contact with the floor), then slowly lower without ever fully coming to rest back on the ground.

Creating as many muscle fibers is possible that regard another thing you can do is hack your muscles on that something that I'll do from time to time just to maintain a mind to muscle connection I mean really strength in that connection to the point where you know you can just flash you right path on its on its own without having to look down and an real force it you knows you know during HS look at all sometimes what's my chest and just make sure that everything is you know prop firing properly I'll just to chinos have that connection especially back its it back is a really toughest by far the toughest muscle to maintain that that connection with just because you never really see your back so he changed the.

Get a cloth tape measure (or some yarn and a yard stick) and determine the size of your shoulders right at the top (to where it's almost popping off); your bust at the fullest point (without squishing); then measure your waist just above your belly button; and your hips — slightly below your hip bone and around the biggest part of your bum.

The weird part about it was I didn't pay for my account but at that point in time I was able to message him right back without any charges.

Well, they are right in that regard, which seems to be the real point of the film in the end, as these are people who live from day to day without much to look forward to except to go to work and drink all night, then do it all again the next day.