Sentences with phrase «right wrongs approaches»

Five games and a long offseason later, a chance to right wrongs approaches.

Not exact matches

For example: having a name that clearly cues a category or suggests a benefit can be the right or wrong approach.

With a 5 - to - 1 approach, you can be wrong the majority of the time, you just have to be right once.

Of course, this is entirely separate to trading matters, there are no right or wrong ways to approach the market.

The wrong approach to holiday credit card spending can actually set you up for years of debt, while the right approach makes it manageable from before you even pull out your card.

It goes without saying that I agree with Pete's center - right agenda below, with its mend them, don't end them approach to our minimalist entitlements and its due concern for doing everything that can be done to sustain our nongovernmental intermediary institutions (which, of course can be choked by too much or the wrong kind of government).

Here the field is wide open, not merely for the indictment of wrong in another person or group which is the usual approach, but for the appreciation and creation of right through the spiritual resources released in prayer.

I believe Wright is wrong with his «New Perspective on Paul» idea, but I think he is right on target with this essay and helped confirm some of what I have been thinking about a new (or old) approach to reading the Bible.

«This is different to a bottom - up approach where it has to make moral decisions about how it acts, and you then give it feedback on whether that's right or wrong.

This was never going to last, since heresy and relativism had, of course, never disappeared from the «papal agenda» and neither — perhaps more to the point — had his (and his predecessor's) analysis that disunity in the modern church was the result of a clash between two different interpretations of the Council itself, one right, the other wrong: as Benedict once more explained it, as his first Christmas as Pope approached in December 2005, «On the one hand, there is an interpretation that I would call «a hermeneutic of discontinuity and rupture» [i.e., the line peddled by The Tabletfor thirty years]; it has frequently availed itself of the sympathies of the mass media, and also one trend of modern theology.

And indeed there is a right and wrong way of approaching religion.

The standard of «affirmative consent» (the much - mocked gradualist approach of Antioch College), and renewed inquiries into how alcohol erases agency (and how a prospective partner can gauge inebriation), are not wrong, but they're a long way from being fully right.

No single approach is either right or wrong when it comes to demonstrating food and farming sustainability, writes David Green.

Hockey people reluctant to fault the system typically take an approach like Winnipeg GM Kevin Cheveldayoff, who said, «Whether the format itself is right or wrong, if you want to win the Cup, you have to find a way to get through this format.»

As it stands, this squad is fairly well positioned to compete for the Wenger Cup and make a deep run in the Europa, if and only if we play first stringers in Europe and use the bench for the League and FA Cups... that being said, and based on the fragility of the manager and the team in recent campaigns, it's more likely that Wenger will focus on a top 4 finish and the FA Cup... while the reasons for such an approach may appear logical, it would confirm a rather disturbing trend and appear counter intuitive for any team which claims to have higher aspirations... I feel that Wenger simply can't afford to put all his eggs in the Europa basket because if he fails the potential backlash could cripple any top 4 chances due to the aforementioned fragile psyche that tends to rear it's ugly head like our own personal groundhog day each and every February... furthermore, can you even imagine Wenger bringing in the necessary recruits to adequately supply top quality lineups in a Thursday / Sunday dominated schedule; based on everything I've seen in recent years, I can't see that happening... in fact, mark my words, it's more likely that we see Lacazette playing out wide in Alexis's position with Giroud at striker, than we see Wenger make the necessary moves to right this ship... god, I hope I'm wrong but is it really that far - fetched considering what we've witnessed for past several years

Key individuals right across the team are approaching or are already on the wrong side of 30, namely Gerard Pique, Sergio Busquets, Javier Mascherano, Andres Iniesta, Luis Suarez and Lionel Messi.

There is still time for another twist or two, though, and if the Gunners are going to make it happen then we need to approach the remaining eight games with just the right attitude of defiance and determination to prove people wrong.

There was nothing wrong with Klopp's approach - it made perfect sense and is what Liverpool have done all season - but that ever - so - slight weakness down the right was their undoing.

Her strengths - based approach ensures that counseling addresses not just what's going wrong, but identifies and nurtures what is going right.

Her strengths - based approach ensures that treatment not only addresses what's going wrong, but also identifies and nurtures what is going right.

There is no one right or wrong way to approach feeding your baby once he or she has arrived.

If you are implying that Neufeld thinks that sexual abuse is acceptable on some level, or that his approach doesn't involve drawing «firm lines between right and wrong,» you are mistaken.

There is something wrong with a scientific approach that thinks it has to be proven with randomized experiments that a paltry human - made substance doesn't match up with the elixir of human breast milk (thousands of ingredients in the right proportions for that particular baby to build the brain, body, immune system).

Whether you're trying to keep your preschooler out of trouble or teach her right from wrong, try a better, more effective approach than simply saying «no.»

If one of you has a more lenient parenting style, and the other is harsher, do you fight about whose approach is right or wrong?

The approach agreed on by Clegg, Cameron and Hughes in private appears to be that the policies are right - it's just the communications which are wrong.

But while the hyper - critical media, mostly of the southern hue and boasting differing motives, got the end result right, they got the process frightfully wrong, because of their emotive approach.

The absurdity of suggesting that Iain Duncan Smith's Christian motivations were any kind of secret and of criticising the use of moral categories to justify his policy approaches - only lefties are allowed to have morals, after all; to be Right Wing is, by definition, to be evil, seeking to impose final solutions on the poor, force them to eat rotting horse - flesh, and cleansing them from beyond the sight of nice middle class folk; any right - winger employing a moral term such as «wrong» or «sin» must have some sinister ulterior motivation - has been covered already by the Editor and by CraRight Wing is, by definition, to be evil, seeking to impose final solutions on the poor, force them to eat rotting horse - flesh, and cleansing them from beyond the sight of nice middle class folk; any right - winger employing a moral term such as «wrong» or «sin» must have some sinister ulterior motivation - has been covered already by the Editor and by Craright - winger employing a moral term such as «wrong» or «sin» must have some sinister ulterior motivation - has been covered already by the Editor and by Cranmer.

«To right the wrongs of his predecessor, Stephen Crabb must reverse cuts to Universal Credit that will see two million working families an average of # 1,600 a year worse off, put right the injustice that millions of women approaching state pension age have suffered and he must scrap the illegal Bedroom Tax.

In contrast, deontological approaches focus on moral rules and ideas of rights and duties, such that certain things (like killing an innocent person) are wrong even if they maximize good outcomes (like saving extra lives).

What she's doing now: «My approach has been the same from the get - go,» Schor says, namely figuring out why and how things go wrong with the hope that you might then figure out how to make them right.

Instead of viewing the left and the right as either inherently correct or wrong, a more scientific approach is to recognize that liberals and conservatives emphasize different moral values.

However, the perception in the scientific community, right or wrong, is certain to be colored by the NIH approach.

As you can see, the take - home message from this is that there is no one - size - fits - all approach to nutrition, so you shouldn't be a slave to dogmatic myths about what's right and wrong.

I don't think that either approach is right or wrong, and nor do I think that one approach or the other is right for every person.

Like sidling up to the blackjack table, there is a right and a wrong way to approach an online dating website.

MANITOWOC — May 31 — There's a right and wrong way to approach online dating.

Hooking up online can be a challenge if you aren't using the right hookup site or you're approaching potential dates the wrong way.

If you take this approach to your life, especially your dating, you will see that there are no rights or wrongs.

Keep in mind, there are always right and wrong ways to approach it.

In those cases, he bucked the system and was proven to be a hero for it; «Civil War» presents a scenario where his individualism is not inherently the right approach, and may even be the wrong thing to do.

For example, you can create a story to use throughout soft - skill learning; such as training about HIPAA regulations and what is a right thing to do or a wrong approach to take.

Michelle Rhee left her D.C. schools post only a few months ago, but around the country a conventional wisdom has already settled in: Rhee had the right idea but the wrong approach.

This relationship - building approach helps the student develop positive, socially appropriate behaviors by focusing on what the student is doing right rather than on what the student is doing wrong.

A «comprehensive approach [to character education] is based on a somewhat dim view of human nature,» acknowledges William Kilpatrick, whose book Why Johnny Can't Tell Right from Wrong contains such assertions as: «Most behavior problems are the result of sheer «willfulness» on the part of children.»

Jepsen lightly approached the question of where Judge Thomas Moukawsher's broad indictment of public K - 12 education was right or wrong as a matter of policy, but the appeal sharply attacks the judge's legal basis for ruling that shortcomings he identified violate students» rights under the state Constitution to a free and adequate education.

However, there are right and wrong ways to approach producers.

It is a book best read in print, or on the iPad because it is full of screen - prints of social sharing examples and a dissection of where they were right or wrong in their approach.

Neither approach is necessarily right or wrong; there are multiple ways to skin a fish, so to speak.

I do think claiming there is one right way is the wrong approach.