Sentences with phrase «righting using wings»

Not exact matches

Since then, the two have formed a solid working relationship — a partnership based on mutual need: Paul could use legislative heft in advance of a potential 2016 presidential bid, and McConnell needs some home - state cred with the new right wing.

As for Anthony Weiner, he was targeted by the late provocateur Andrew Breitbart and fellow Right - wing activists who used fake email addresses and pretended to be underage girls.

«A right - wing media network anchored around Breitbart developed as a distinct and insulated media system, using social media as a backbone to transmit a hyper - partisan perspective,» the study says.

U.S. President Donald Trump loudly insisted on Tuesday that both left - and right - wing groups used force in the aftermath of a white supremacist rally and that all of the facts were not yet in about street clashes in Charlottesville, Va..

In a nutshell, because it has given more ammunition to supporters of Donald Trump and other right - wing gun advocates who argue that the media is biased against their cause and uses tricks to discredit them.

Using a personality profiling methodology, the company — formed by high - powered right - wing investors for just this purpose — began offering its profiling system to dozens of political campaigns.

Cambridge Analytica is a shady company owned by the British firm SCL Group — and, reportedly, in part by the right - wing - funding Mercer family — which claimed it could build models that identify persuadable voters by using six key personality types.

Since his last re-election, Clarke has openly supported Republican causes on local and national right - wing media outlets; proudly trumpets on official Milwaukee County letterhead his 2013 award from the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association, whose leader suggested using women and children as human shields during Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy's standoff with federal agents; accused Milwaukee County Executive Chris Abele of having «penis envy» and being on heroin when crafting the county budget and needing to be drug tested; blasted Milwaukee County District Attorney John Chisholm and Chief Judge Jeffrey Kremers for being «soft on crime»; provided minimal protection for President Obama during his 2012 visit; employs former Scott Walker spokeswoman Fran McLaughlin, who was given criminal immunity over her role in Walker's mixing of campaign and county business; and created pro-gun public service announcements.

In the article, the MSM propagandist states such things as: 2017 has seen, according to his one time Goldman Sachs source, a «dramatic crash in [physical gold coin] demand,» that interest in gold coins is linked to «political conservatism, or anarcho - libertarianism» and «end of the world right wing sentiments,» that gold has been implicated in a «conspiracy to commit money laundering,» that gold is «financed by people in the narcotics trade,» that it comes from «illegal mines and drug dealers in Peru, Bolivia and Ecuador,» that «the federal authorities assume the NTR Metals [case] represented only a fraction of illegally sourced and financed gold,» that therefore the US attorney is broadly investigating the gold industry, that gold is «produced by exploited workers,» that «crude [gold] extraction techniques create serious and lasting environmental damage,» that gold plays an important part in «tax evasion,» that it is related to American gun sales, which the author abhors; that «drug dealers [use] gold imports as a way of laundering their proceeds,» and that «they came to realize that illegal gold [is] an intrinsically better business» than drug dealing; to name but a few of the aspersions cast against gold in the short article.

«The Bush administration uses him to try to create a connection between right - wing Protestant evangelicals and right - wing Catholics.»

i would say bringing harm to children or young people would be a definite... but yet the right wing «christians» can somehow justify dropping bombs on civilians... but sometimes maybe bombs have to be used to protect us or others, just like a person may need to use gun to protect himself or his family..

No money involved there, but how can we dissuade people from learning it, I got it... throw in some Christian faith, high - jack it from ordinary people and use said faith to attack said theory even though it really doesn't matter — but hey, its a wedge issue and might get said right - wing politician into power by exploiting peoples faith.

Right wing christian wacko's don't believe in using contraception or abortion, yet then when these babies are born into poverty they also don't believe in goverment assistance.

I once attended a lecture in which a right - wing evangelical speaker used isolated examples of eco-terrorism to paint the entire green movement as having a «violent, anti-Christian agenda.»

Vouchers can also be used for a David Duke school or a right - wing militia school or a Louis Farrakhan school — any type of ethnically or ideologically extremist school with a hateful and divisive agenda.

In my mind, militant right - wing «Christians» (i use the term loosely), are little different in their fanaticism than the radical zealots many Muslim madrassahs turn out.

I bet the judge is a right - wing troll using his court to «prove» the point that the Court system is using sharia law.

After all that, the political campaigning wing of the right - to - life movement could have used a break, but this was not to be.

In American political rhetoric — stump speeches, newspaper editorials, party propaganda — the terms «left wing» and «right wing» are used as epithets.

Are you using the crazy right - wing nutjob version?

Third, the right wing makes an error that has long been used to justify commercial broadcasting: it confuses the public with the market, and equates citizens with consumers.

These right - wing, nut - jobs who claim to be Christian only want to over-populate the Earth which in turn, will use up natural resources faster.

See, for instance, the use of 2 Chronicles 7:14 («If my people who are called by my name humble themselves, and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and I will forgive their sin and heal their land») by many in the Evangelical wing of the religious right.

It (In God We Trust), however... is «consistently» used by many if not all of the christian right - wing to show that as far as a «religion»... the U.S...

You are SERIOUSLY using a video from this right - wing whack job organization as EVIDENCE?

I used blue cheese dressing instead of ranch and 1/3 cup of wing sauce we just the right amount of heat.

At least Theo finally realized that he's not a striker, and is best used on the right wing.

I think that Wenger uses Ramsey on the wings nowdays to slow the right side a bit down.

We have Alexis, Giroud, Welbeck, Lucas, Akpom, Sanogo for CF On wings we have Alexis, Walcott, Ox, Lucas, Welbeck, Campbell, Iwobi and Ramsey (Wenger uses him on right sometimes)

we don't need any more midfielders we have enough what with Santi Cazorla, Jack Wilshere coming back and what with Alex Iwobi playing the way he is and its time Theo Walcott started playing on the right wing like he use to, so it remains us to concentrate on a WC striker and may be an understudy to Laurent Koscielny / Per Mertesacker

They welcomed Dominic Lopez back to the lineup on Sunday and right off the bat he showed off why he was missed so much — he provides another versatile option on the wing which really allows Team Goldin to space the floor and properly use their talented bigs down low.

You might as well use Walcott as a right wing back!

If my memory serves me correctly, Welbeck was mostly used as a striker and right - winger, but I'm sure he has played before at left - wing for us and ManU.

OT: Looking @ our team I think we need one good attacker more especially on that right wing, not necessarily a striker as walcott and sanchez can play there, as in someone like Pedro... If we use our best line up up front which Sanchez, Giroud and Walcott, then imagine what we will have on the bench offensively..

Use Ox on the right wing till Theo is fit.

Walcott is no longer needed with our new formation 3 -5-2 we are using Belerin on the right wing what was once TW's hang out, i think TW shot himself in the foot by demanding he wanted to be a striker which his not, TW with his lightning speed (but not much dribbling skills) will best serve teams that park the bus and counter attack

eleny is santi replacment (which is a joke) and ramsey will be used in the right wing, bec he is bale lost brother, and wengers fav player.

He's a beast, Just what we have been missing, am excited, if wenger gets the right players before the first game, I will give him my 100 % support, am always going to support the team, it's wenger that needs to use the players well, don't put lacazette on the forking wing pls...

The Arrows featured a mini-wing mounted high up above the front wing in something that looked like it would have been more at home with the high wings used in the 1960s, while the Jordan had a smaller wing on a pylon located right in front of the driver.

ks not sure what you got thumbed down for i think wilshire does seem to play better coming from a deeper postion and rotating the players more i think we all agree thats been a problem for us for quite a while the left wing can be sorted aslong as we use the right players wich we seem to have sitting on the bench most of the time,,, i really hope wenger goes in for a top defencive player in january and as he normally dosent do alot in the winter maybe someone who can cover cb / cdm

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Mkhitaryan and Maitland - Niles would be explosive that way, because Mkhitaryan can use his stronger right leg to dribble in the right wing and we all know Maitland - Niles's skills and pace when he played as a left wingback.

Another fault stemming from his inability to change non working tactics is to persist with square pegs in round holes; so many central midfielder or even strikers have been used on the right wing, also on the left at times.

Why not get Martinez and use Theo on the right wing??? We need a striker

With the 3 -4-3, Henderson is used as a willing right wing - back.

I see our priorities in the transfer market using this formation being a new left and right wing back, a center back, a defensive midfielder and a striker.

I have seen another sanchez on the right wing in the OX, walcot and giroud should be used as our super subs after wenger gets that striker in that said transfer list,

However, we are getting worse and worse Wenger doesn't sign the right players and doesn't use properly the ones we have Not only did Wenger not get the Top forward and DM we need but he hasn't used Lucas often enough, the forward he did get He has given too much attention to Ramsey and Iwobi Most of Our top players are not performing well too I would say are most consistent players are Alexis and Koscielny Also, Wenger should have stayed with Alexis up front and Giroud as SuperSub and used Lucas or Welbeck and Walcott on wings

i think we should keep Wilshere and there is no way Theo is moving with his huge wages so throw him on the right wing, back to back four to be able to better use Belerin and Monreal, lets get back to basic's with our two signings we should do better once the transfer market shuts so players settle

Best used out on the right wing to allow him to cut in on his left, that may not work at Anfield given the effectiveness and importance of pace out wide for Klopp with Mohamed Salah and Sadio Mane impressing.