Not exact matches
Specifically, any unsolicited actions of others that physically affect an individual's
property or person, no matter if the result of those actions is damaging, beneficial, or neutral to the
owner, are considered violent or aggressive when they are
against the
owner's free will and interfere with his
right to self - determination and the principle of self - ownership.
It is the
owner's responsibility to provide reasonable notice and take reasonable precautions
against unwanted trespass; e.g., putting up a wall or fence, closing and / or locking a door or gate, posting signs and / or hiring security to patrol the
property and enforce
property rights - or occasionally checking to make sure their
property isn't overrun with squatters.
Therefore, the grantor promises (1) that he or she is the
owner of the
property, (2) that there are no encumbrances
against the
property during the time the grantor owned it, and (3) that the grantor will not interfere with the transferee's
rights to the
property.
The main question is whether the court, in applying the common law of nuisance, should require a balancing of social utility and reasonableness of the project
against the
property owner's
right to be compensated for interference from a public project.
The family of an individual that has been wrongfully injured or killed due to negligent or absent security has the
right to take legal action
against the
property owner.
When the injuries are as a result of the negligence of the
property owner, an attorney can secure your
rights and seek damages
against the condominium
owner, and even the condominium association.
The Land Titles Act does not recognize any
right of adverse possession as
against the registered
owner of
property.
By using a this deed, the grantor promises the transferee (1) that he or she is the
owner of the
property and has the
right to convey it, (2) that no one else is possessing the
property, (3) that there are no encumbrances
against the
property, (4) that no one with a better claim to the
property will interfere with the transferee's
rights, and (5) to defend certain claims regarding title to the
property.
If you were bitten or attacked and you believe it was because the dog's handler or the private
property owner was negligent in controlling the dog, you may have the
right to bring a negligence - based claim
against that individual.
Contact us to assert your
rights against a negligent landlord,
owner, security company or
property manager.
In these cases, we will seek just compensation for the
owner by bringing an inverse condemnation suit
against the government and can assert the overly restrictive regulations equate to a «taking» of
property or of
property rights.
When a person is injured due to unsafe conditions on another person's
property, they could have the
right to make a claim for their damages
against the
owner of the
property.
Victims injured by negligence on someone else's
property have the
right to make a claim
against the
property owner.
If you actually don't have the
right of way you think you do, your claim for relief may be
against the former
owners of the
property or your title insurance provider.Once we confirmed your
right - of - way, you'd have to file an action for an injunction
against your neighbor (pending a demand letter and other negotiations not working).
Cases that do go forward — and occasionally get high - profile media coverage — are more often
against property owners and managers than
against real estate sales associates, says Stuart Ishimaru, an attorney with the Civil
Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice.
A California tenant served with an eviction notice in 2009 by a bank that became the
owner of the foreclosed
property she was renting does not have the
right to bring a private action
against the bank for allegedly violating the 2009 Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act.