Sentences with phrase «rights are as a parent»

This contact is known as visitation in Kansas, and knowing what your rights are as a parent will help ensure your relationship with your child continues after divorce.

Not exact matches

«We want to be thoughtful about what we do, giving parents the right tools to oversee their kids» use of our products,» USA Today quoted Diwanji as saying.

Anything within their legal rights will be made transparent, only keeping confidential any Amazon information (their more secretive parent company) that is considered proprietary, as well as complying with the appropriate employee data guidelines.

The handcrafted medal on the right was awarded to him last year when he served as co-president of the parents council at his son's school.

While the successor's curse might lead us to believe that being born into an iconic family such as the Murdoch's means that one can never achieve success in his own right, there are paths out of a parent's shadow that a successor must take.

As a parent, it can make sense to take out a Parent PLUS loan — you want to do what's best for your child and help pay for their education, parent, it can make sense to take out a Parent PLUS loan — you want to do what's best for your child and help pay for their education, Parent PLUS loan — you want to do what's best for your child and help pay for their education, right?

«We're excited where we are right now,» said John Krafcik, CEO of Waymo, formerly known as the Google self - driving car project and now a separate company within Google's parent company, Alphabet.

As an employer, Edward Jones has been named among the «100 Best Companies to Work For» and «Best Workplaces for Parents» by Fortune magazine, as well as one of the Human Rights Campaign's «Best Places to Work for LGBT Equality.&raquAs an employer, Edward Jones has been named among the «100 Best Companies to Work For» and «Best Workplaces for Parents» by Fortune magazine, as well as one of the Human Rights Campaign's «Best Places to Work for LGBT Equality.&raquas well as one of the Human Rights Campaign's «Best Places to Work for LGBT Equality.&raquas one of the Human Rights Campaign's «Best Places to Work for LGBT Equality.»

Because of what Sinek characterizes as «faulty parenting,» corporations are faced with millennials who are «hard - wired» to get much of what they want right away, from food deliveries to entertainment on demand.

Parent of 6 — Akin and Ryan have co-authored bills (PLURAL) to limit women's rights, and as a sitting member of the science committee he has proven himself to be unworthy of our trust on these matters.

We don't always get it right as church leaders, we don't always get it right as parents, but the big picture is as a family we're on this journey together — we've been called as a family to do this.

Perhaps the most common use of the language of parental rights is to protect the possessive claims of those whose history of abuse or neglect as parents has largely undermined their claim to the title.

As Nuremberg had shown, there is a higher law than the positive law of nations and every child has the right to be brought up by his or her parents.

Among them are the rights to: bullet joint parenting; bullet joint adoption; bullet joint foster care, custody, and visitation (including non-biological parents); bullet status as next - of - kin for hospital visits and medical decisions where one partner is too ill to be competent; bullet joint insurance policies for home, auto and health; bullet dissolution and divorce protections such as community property and child support; bullet immigration and residency for partners from other countries; bullet inheritance automatically in the absence of a will; bullet joint leases with automatic renewal rights in the event one partner dies or leaves the house or apartment; bullet inheritance of jointly - owned real and personal property through the right of survivorship (which avoids the time and expense and taxes in probate); bullet benefits such as annuities, pension plans, Social Security, and Medicare; bullet spousal exemptions to property tax increases upon the death of one partner who is a co-owner of the home; bullet veterans» discounts on medical care, education, and home loans; joint filing of tax returns; bullet joint filing of customs claims when traveling; bullet wrongful death benefits for a surviving partner and children; bullet bereavement or sick leave to care for a partner or child; bullet decision - making power with respect to whether a deceased partner will be cremated or not and where to bury him or her; bullet crime victims» recovery benefits; bullet loss of consortium tort benefits; bullet domestic violence protection orders; bullet judicial protections and evidentiary immunity; bullet and more...

To hold that same - sex marriage is part of the fundamental right to marry, or necessary for giving LGBT people the equal protection of the laws, the Court implicitly made a number of other assumptions: that one - flesh union has no distinct value in itself, only the feelings fostered by any kind of consensual sex; that there is nothing special about knowing the love of the two people whose union gave you life, whose bodies gave you yours, so long as you have two sources of care and support; that what children need is parenting in some disembodied sense, and not mothering and fathering.

One of the most poignant experiences for young people growing up in our society is to espouse some cause such as civil rights or world peace — a cause they learned to love in their home or church — and then find that their parents are opposed to overt action on behalf of social justice.

I concluded at the time of the riots that of all the things the government now needed to do, it was the married family which most urgently needed to be rebuilt: I was and remain as certain of that as anything I have ever written, and I have been saying it repeatedly for over 20 years: I was saying it, for instance, when I was attacking (in The Mail and also The Telegraph), as it went through the Commons, the parliamentary bill which became that disastrous piece of (Tory) legislation called the Children Act 1989, which abolished parental rights (substituting for them the much weaker «parental responsibility»), which encouraged parents not to spend too much time with their children, which even, preposterously, gave children the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smack.»

When asked if dads should get the same time off as mothers after the birth of their child he replied: «I don't see why not, a child has two parents often and actually to give them both equal rights is a good thing.

You may feel that you have improved as parents, but your child is going right on with his perverse ways.

They have the ability to renounce their parents religion and chose another (as our wonderfully christian right candidate Newt has — numerous times) as they do with nationality — assuming certain criteria are met.

That was something taught to me right from the beginning by my parents, my teachers, and the priests and nuns at the church I attended as a child.

I know of a father who, though he had once been convinced parents of LGBT children should «hand them over to Satan» as recommended by John MacAruthur, just marched in his first pride parade right alongside his gay son.

Do you think it would be right as a parent for you to tell the kids «watch out for the pit», and then wash your hands of it should any not believe your warning?

Your parents had rights under the law as people who were born.

i certainly do not feel any hate towards this upbringing as my parents were doing what they felt right.

In the season finale, the justices delivered split opinions in two cases that had not even been fully briefed and argued on the merits — one about President Trump's limits on immigration from six majority - Muslim nations, the other about the right of a female same - sex spouse to be listed as a parent on a birth certificate alongside the birth mother.

This obligation is qualified only by the principle that parents may not make grossly unjust demands upon the child, on pain of interference by the state as guardian of basic human rights.

So much of our lives are what Eugene Peterson characterized as a «long obedience in the same direction» with no real finish line: parenting, marriage building, discipleship, friendships, growing up, making the world right.

As for the conclusion of Aidan O'Neill QC, that schools will be within their statutory rights to dismiss staff who refuse to use stories or textbooks promoting same - sex marriage and that parents who object to gay marriage being taught to their children will have no right to withdraw their children from lessons, does that sound at all unlikely, given the cases of the Strasbourg four, which were considered by the European Court of Justice in September?

It is unlikely that Pope Paul VI or any of the bishops in 1968 would have imagined that within a few decades a substantial proportion of Catholic parents in some Western countries would be living together outside of marriage or that the Church in those countries would be defending her rights against those who claim that homosexual partnerships must be treated as being of equal value with marriage.

Rather than being seen as a subject with its own set of rights, the child has become an object whose parents get to determine which set of rights it has.

(i) a woman's right to an abortion; (iii) medical immunization of teen girls (and boys) against HPV; (iv) assisted suicide; (vi) gay marriage; (vii) my right to view art and theatre deemed «offensive,» «blasphemous» or «obscene» Catholics; (viii) basic $ ex education for older school children; (ix) treating drug abuse as principally a medical issue; (x) population control; (xi) buying alcohol on a Sunday in many places; (xii) use of condoms and other contraceptives; (xiii) embryonic stem cell research; (xiv) little 10 year - old boys joining organizations such as the Boy Scouts of America, regardless of the religious views of their parents; and (xv) gays being allowed to serve openly in the military.

Individuals in same - sex partnerships are now claiming the right to be listed on the birth certificates of their partners» children — as parents.

Every parent has a right and a duty to ensure that their primary role as educators of their children is not sub-contracted out to schools.

In any event, we have no right to refuse this opportunity to any who, either by their own adult act of commitment or through the earnest decision of their parents, can be brought within the ambit of the Christian community where God's care, as made available through Christ's deed in the world, may have its effect.

Children believe in invisible monsters under their beds, are convinced of it no matter how reassuring you as a parent are, but we know they aren't actually real, right?

We are immersed in a thoroughly secular bourgeois culture, and so we have to will ourselves, again and again, to recall our religiously formed and religiously ordered rights and responsibilities as parents, as families.

Face it, we as a society have every right to tell parents that some things are just not in society's best interest to teach their children.

Do we not do the same when we are disciplined by our parents as children or by our employer when we call ourselves adults, don't we want to «get our own back» don't we relish it when they become ill or have an accident and we say «it serves them right» justice has been done.

I was a most imperfect parent, as I didn't learn all that right away.

Jesus Christ, is and it will be forever more the unique object lesson of living, the human being not ever, although we may be Christians we don't leave of to sin, for the very her writing she says Aerquémonos confiadamente at the throne of your handsomeness in order to reach forgiving in order to the perpetual help, in as much as not tenemos one God which not it can feel pity for of we, rather one which fué tempting all over, but without sin, according to the letter at the age of Hebrews, and the apostle John she says, whether various hubiere sin, solicitor tenemos in order to with the parent to Jesus Christ the that's right, not ever not any human being it will be the best object lesson not other than The Christ Jesus, nor Buddah bo Mahoma nor none, we don't follow to humanity rather at a God which fué tempting all over but without sin, not ever we owe put her scope in the humanity not other than in the.

It makes parents think that divorce won't be a big deal so long as they do it right.

As a naturally strong - willed child, my parents had to reiterate to that valuing other people was more important than being right.

As a parent, it is your right (and duty) to help your kids put information into a proper context — but trying to shield them from information and dissenting opinions will hinder their educations and thus their options later in life.

That is their right as a parent, again, within the bounds of the law.

You are right, the god that flooded everything is just as immoral, he killed innocent babies and children for the sins of the parents, that god does not deserve worship.

According to the logic of the Court, the Free Exercise Clause does not protect churches in these circumstances, unless some other constitutional right, such as Free Speech or the right of parents to control the upbringing of their children, is violated by the governmental intrusion.

What I think I'd like to do is to write about it here in a series of posts, hand - in - hand with these homeschool book posts, taking on what I think he gets right as well as assumptions about children, parenting, and education with which I take issue.

Then he turned to more individualistic terms to define fairness as «a bargain in American life»: «When you work hard and pay your taxes; when you're a good parent and citizen; when you obey the law and play by the rules you have a right to expect certain things in exchange, as a part of the bargain.

After all, it was through political and legal struggles over many years, and as a result of compromises, that other Western democracies recognized the pluralistic nature of a free society and adopted policies protecting the rights of parents and of educators to maintain and receive public funding for faith - based schools.