Sentences with phrase «rights as gay people»

You're an embarrassment to people fighting for your rights as gay people.

Conservative students at Oxford university have started a campaign for the same rights as gay people and ethnic minorities after claims they are being persecuted on campus.

But I made a commitment to support anyone who recognized my rights as a gay person.

Not exact matches

Kenney allies routinely bring up his efforts as immigration minister to bring in gay people persecuted in Iraq and Iran, but there's no mention of him expanding or safeguarding LGBTQ rights for those within Canada.

to President Obama's second inaugural, in which he cast the holy places of women's rights, civil rights, and gay rights as the postmodern Bethlehem («We, the people, declare today that the most evident of truths — that all of us are created equal — is the star that guides us still; just as it guided our forebears through Seneca Falls, and Selma, and Stonewall»).

im glad no - one believes in demons - the devil or god — and they try to rationalise everything — and discredit the bible — just shows me where we are at in the holy book — see if i remember, the end times come when «scorners and scoffers abound» when — wrong is called right and right is called wrong — and people would be married and given in marriage as in the daysd of noah --- sodom and gammorah had gay issues badly - im just gonna laugh and alaugh and laugh when ya «ll burn - do me a favor — at least read the bible once — see what it says before you — go against it.

There are only individual rights, and they belong to people who are gay just as much as they belong to any individual.

Gay people started wanting the same marriage rights as others so people started being afraid.

Maybe when Christians stop toting themselves as the moral authority on EVERYTHING and keep their noses out of peoples personal lives AND stop trying to keep taxpaying American citizens from having rights (ie gays)... maybe then they will come into less ridicule.

I'm certain that had he lived to see a gay rights movement he would have been marching right alongside them as he did for minorities, the poor and oppressed, because it would have been a civil rights matter for him; a matter of justice for, as he said, ALL of God's people.

While glad to see the change of attitude among conservative Christians with respect to gay civil rights and acceptance of gays as human beings, some persons were troubled over other aspects of the issue.

Were religious people promoting peace when they voted down gay marriage (a civil rights issue, opponents of which will be viewed in the same light as the opponents against civil rights in the 50s and 60s) You are just so comfortable in the majority, you can't see the prejudice and bias you put on people that aren't like you.

It's one thing to disagree on fiscal or some social issues; it's another thing to look at gay people and say «that grosses me out; therefore, they shouldn't have the same rights as me».

So long as gay couples are granted equal rights by the government, people have the right to include or exclude whoever they want from their religions; social approval and disdain will come as it does.

Sane people can disagree about whether there ought to be a right to privacy, i.e., about whether it is logically a natural right and if so perhaps ought to be put into the Constitution via amendment, or about whether we (usually at state - level) should pass particular laws, such as ones that legalize gay - marriage, that factually expand what might be called privacy, but no sane U.S. Citizen, gay, straight, liberal, or conservative, should be left ignorant about the Constitution - wounding judicial usurpations done in the name of this right, more of which are planned to be done soon enough.

He seems obsessed with the idea that because people don't all agree with him on issues such as gay marriage that it is essential we all look to the bible to figure out what's ethical and moral, and all assume that it is the final word on what's right or wrong.

Just replace black with gay and you'll understand what is happening when people like you use their religion as a weapon against EQUAL rights in a SECULAR country.

And, of course, none of this as anything to do with gay people wishing to be married, and being denied the right to do so.

Gay marriage is about two gay people having the same rights and benefits as married, straight COUPLGay marriage is about two gay people having the same rights and benefits as married, straight COUPLgay people having the same rights and benefits as married, straight COUPLES.

If you were active in opposing things like gay rights people a hundred years from now will remember you at least as well as we remember slave owners these days.

The fundamental (excuse the pun) problems with far - right Christianity are exactly the same issues our Savior spoke about to the Pharisees: judgmentalism, hypocrisy, intolerance, and the hyper - extremity of observing the letter of the law rather than its spirit (as evidenced by statements from various preachers that people such gays and disobedient children should be killed).

Yes, gay people want inheritance rights, hospital rights, tax benefits, and social security benfits as straight people.

If a gay person is seen as having a right to a new, non-traditional, form of marriage, how can anyone deny a similar right to a bi-se.

, I don't think in my lifetime I will have to worry about that question coming up in the Catholic church, but gay people should have the right to marry in a civil ceremony in all 50 states as I do.

Trying to keep gay people from having the same rights as you just becuase they are gay and you are not is in no way moral behavior.

So this black person, who represents a group of colored people who were once segregated and considered less than whites, is attempting to rally in other black people to tell the public they don't consider gay people to have the same rights as straight people.

All people are God's Beloved children If they are gay They may not to be straightened Any more than my straight - ness Can by choice be «bent» What gives me the right To treat another's sexuality As if it is contagious?

They were treated to a litany of anti-LGBT propaganda, including the false claims that being molested as a child causes hom.ose.xuality, that LGBT people are se.xual predators trying to turn children gay by molesting them, and that gay rights activists want to replace marriage with a culture of se.xual promiscuity.

The gay rights movement needs to clean house to win a better public image of itself so that people stop contemplating scenarios where their children will be exposed to something as horrifying as some of the messages out there.

I just mean that maybe Christians can compromise by acknowledging that laws evolve and change and to accept that gays want the same rights as married people and to be respectful of that and maybe gays can compromise by not insisting to use the word «marriage» but instead use the word «union» or some other word or phrase to describe their relationship.

I can't see many people on the right wing who are Christian, yet would spit on a gay soldier fighting for their rights or allowing a less fortunate to die, as long as they can keep every last dollar for themselves.

Tanya Erzen is no sympathizer with what she describes as the Religious Right, although gay activists sometimes suggest that her sympathy for people in the ex-gay movement means she is just another conservative «homophobe.»

but if you expect people to respect you, then shouldnt you respect others who have a different opinion as well??? the truth is, not everyone thinks gay marriage is right.

People have the right to see the gay agenda as offensive and not support it.

The WSCC statement refuses to reduce homosexual people to their genital expression: «Gays and lesbians have just as much right to our approval and acceptance of their overall activity.»

NO, as it stands right now I only see Christians picking on gay people.

So when you start talking about evangelicals, the image that comes across in the American press and, as I understand it, in the British press as well, is that these people hate gays, are opposed to women's rights and are anti-environmentalist.

The Left - leaning churches see gay people as people with rights and the right to get married.

GLBTQ Celibacy... a movement that is trending and gaining increased momentum as folks get on board.. - LIE, because over 53 % of people in America now feel gays should have their civil right to get married.

I do nt understand what rights i have as a strait person, that someone who is gay does not?

That would be about the same as suggesting that in order to respect the rights of people who happen to be gay, you just need to take it up the ass every once in awhile.

«Gays aren't missing any rights, gays are the dinkus's that get loud when people do not recognize them as being «owed» something.&raGays aren't missing any rights, gays are the dinkus's that get loud when people do not recognize them as being «owed» something.&ragays are the dinkus's that get loud when people do not recognize them as being «owed» something.»

Chick Fil A as a business wasn't a problem until people discover it's owner contributed money to hate groups masked as «family values» that work against equal rights and protection of gays and lesbians.

CW, if gays shouldn't serve in the military, maybe they shouldn't be in the same schools as «normal» people, or work in the same jobs or pay the same taxes or have the same police and Judaical protections or the right to vote or the right to live anywhere in the country they choose.

This is not Gays VS Christians (or any religion - How fox news of CNN to go there) and it is NOT about what a CEO speaks — this is about people protesting a chain because they do not want the money they pay for a sandwich to go to extreme groups who hate GAYS and work very hard to make sure the gay people do not have the same rights as straight peoGays VS Christians (or any religion - How fox news of CNN to go there) and it is NOT about what a CEO speaks — this is about people protesting a chain because they do not want the money they pay for a sandwich to go to extreme groups who hate GAYS and work very hard to make sure the gay people do not have the same rights as straight peoGAYS and work very hard to make sure the gay people do not have the same rights as straight people.

Gay people can not live a happy, loving life with the same rights as strait people because of Christian beliefs.

Yes, there is an agenda to treat gay and bisexual people as full human beings with equal rights, and to establish that what consenting adults do sexually is their own business; just as you have an agenda to poke your nose into other people's bedrooms, and treat them as lesser beings if they do things there that you disapprove of.

I mean, it has to be a defining moment as it is for gay people right?

That is, where people are arguing to be recognized as «not gay by choice» specifically for the reason of claiming legal rights?

Be as Christian as you want, tell as many gay people as you want that they're going to hell over who they love, nobody cares, but don't trample people's rights because of a belief you hold that is * not * shared by everyone else.