Sentences with phrase «rights by denying»

A state can deny individuals their human rights by denying them access the healthcare, education, or other social goods.

You have once again proven me right by denying the appeal of your decision.

Not exact matches

Both are by men who say Yale discriminated against them based on their race or gender, or denied them their due - process rights.

Courage: Swift stood up to the most successful company in the world by denying Apple Music the right to stream her latest work.

The companies join gay - rights and human rights groups as well as the American Civil Liberties Union in attacking the law over its broad language, which could be used by business owners to use religious objections to deny same - sex couples wedding.

U.S. authorities say Beijing denies foreign companies the right to block use of technology by a Chinese entity once a licensing period ends.

First, there is no incentive for Facebook to do any of this; while the company denies this report in Gizmodo that the company shelved a change to the News Feed algorithm that would have eliminated fake news stories because it disproportionately affected right - wing sites, the fact remains that the company is heavily incentivized to be perceived as neutral by all sides; anything else would drive away users, a particularly problematic outcome for a social network.2

-- Human rights observers were denied access at least five times that year to Kandahar facilities run by the notorious National Directorate of Security

In previous cases recorded by the human rights organizations, citizens were denied access to plane tickets because they failed to follow a court ruling.

The irony continues with the feting of Okotoks as the greenest community in Canada by such pundits as Prime Minister Stephen Harper and CBC's Peter Mansbridge at the same time the «rurban» community sits in the chosen provincial riding of Wildrose leader Danielle Smith — a right wing student of the climate - change - denying Fraser Institute and cheerful avower that global warming science is «not settled.»

Yes it is, in Californa it was the black church support of Prop 8 that denied gay and lesbians the right to marry after it was upheld by the state Supreme Court.

Meanwhile, christians in the United States continued their campaign to deny legal rights to gays, while continuing to pour funds into efforts to make gay behavior a criminal offense, punishable by death, in several African countries.

By demanding that their states revoke liquor licenses, temperance reformers risked denying individuals their constitutional right to due process.

10 — Yes, I do vigorously deny the existence of thousands of gods claimed by other religions, it's my right as a Christian.

By denying certiorari, the Supreme Court let stand a 9th Circuit ruling that affirmed World Vision's right to fire employees who didn't share the organization's religious views.

By denying gays the right to marry, you aren't giving a Paul approved «out» for those who burn with passion.

The right of individuals to possess property, denied by the radical wing of the Reformation, Calvin upheld.

I'm confused it says they will be gossips conceited unholy haters of good without love self love people in the end times to stay away not even to receive them not even pray for them is that blasphemy then it says they hold firm to a godliness but deny its power but I thought blasphemy they don't hold firm to any godliness but are not drawn by the spirit at all to wan na ask forgiveness even it says god is just and will forgive why I wish he would forgive all things his children suffer over that can't change need to also it says if u can say Jesus is lord the holy spirit is with u right or u couldn't even say those words please someone help I've been suffering

The church tries to get around the issue by attempting to somehow separate the individual from who they are and thereby maintain the right to openly condemn them and / or seek to impose a life of celibacy and deny them the same rights of love, marriage, and family they themselves enjoy.

I may not support Mr. Hawking's conclusion, but I can't deny the method by which he could be right.

due to some crazy religious beliefs out there in the world i.e. marrying off young children and marrying genetic kin, the government can't ever allow religion to dictate marriage policy, so have your ceremonies and deny same - gender couples to marry in your church but bluntly stated your crying and foot - stomping will accomplish nothing, marriage isn't a religious thing it is a civil rights and equality thing, thus if the religious win by denying same gender cuples their civil rights to equal treatment under the law, then don't be surprised when others use those same grounds to deny you your rights under the law.

«But why would the very God I believe imprinted us all with a conscience — with a deep sense of right and wrong — ask me to deny that conscience by accepting genocide as just?»

6 — You would be screaming from the rooftops in OPPOSITION if Muslim Koran Sharia Law (or another religion different from your own) was imposed upon everyone and YOU were denied Equal Rights if you did NOT abide by Muslim Law, but you think it is OK to impose Christian Bible Laws on everyone to DENY OTHERS Equal Rights if they do NOT abide by Christian Bible Law.

But such would have to be Arkes» outlook: if indeed there are fundamental principles of natural law and natural right, discernible to the human mind generally (as Arkes thinks), then policies or practices that effectively deny these can only be supported for the short term, or in the long term only by continuing fraud and force.

This is not to deny that rights themselves may conflict, so that those of one individual may be limited, or may in specified ways be overridden, by the rights of others.

Ok we cant deny it anymore the church said, so lets say GOD created evolution but we will not calll it evolution because thats just is admitting that science was right, lets call it Smart design, and so creationism was born, its no surprise that any great discovery gets hijacked and twisted and changed to fit with the religious when so long before proven it gets denied by the same people.

Jesus reveals a free God, who is uncoopted and uncontained by those identified with religion This God is free to hear the cry of the outcasts against the guardians of religious society This God is not under the power of Brahman but is free to hear ones against Brahmans and other upper castes and side with the Dalits, who are ousted from the Temples and who are denied the right to study the Scriptures.28

If you check some of the posts by those who profess a belief, Scarn, you'll find they are intent on denying others the rights they enjoy, telling others their beliefs are blasphemy and that they'll go to hell, and insisting that only those who believe can be moral and compassionate.

There is a very simple difference — anti-gay people think they can control other people through law by denying them legal rights...pro - gay people understand that religious people have their rights to believe and worship freely, but not to discriminate against others via the law based on religious beliefs.

How is she denying Mr. Cathy his rights to free expression by voicing her opinion about his?

Now, gee, why do you think the LGBT community might have issues with people trying to deny them equal rights especially when those people are trying to convince everyone else gay people are subhuman and are even hated by God?

fosters an insatiable avarice, generates false values and needs by its global culture, kills humans due to poverty, malnutrition and violence, exploits women and children, denies to many the basic human right to life and the means of living a decent human life.

Bruce A. Ackerman, in Social Justice in the Liberal State (Yale University Press, 1980), arguing for an astringently secular, rational model, is faithful to the framers at least in the proposition that «nobody has the right to vindicate political authority by asserting a privileged insight into the moral universe which is denied to the rest of us.»

If morality as proclaimed by various religions is denied a place at the policy table, then our nation will only be guided by those with a very cramped and limited moral view — which would have been a disaster for abolition and civil rights way back then — and would be no less a disaster today.

By using the word «person» to define an unborn child, Clinton was recognizing another person's humanity while also denying that person's basic rights.

It's part of the larger Let Her Learn movement by the NWLC that tries to end all of the policies that end up denying students their right to their education, especially at a young age.

The platform planks for «32 embodied a number of Century concerns: U.S. adherence to the World Court protocol; U.S. entry into the League of Nations, provided that its covenant be amended to eliminate military sanctions; U.S. recognition of the Soviet Union (which was granted a year later); the safeguarding of the rights of conscientious objectors (including those denied citizenship, such as Canadian - born theologian D. C. Macintosh of Yale Divinity School); the abolition of compulsory military training in state - supported educational institutions other than military and naval academies; emergency measures for relief and public - works employment; the securing of constitutional rights for minorities; the reduction of gross inequality of income by steeply progressive rates of taxation on large incomes; «progressive socialization of the ownership and control of natural resources, public utilities and basic industries»; «the nationalization of our entire banking system»; and so on (June 8, 1932).

We can not circle our wagons around human rights, a universalism that promises to keep our hands clean by denying we have hands.

In the regime of Roe and its judicial progeny, psychological distress triggers a constitutional right to abortion, even if the distress is occasioned by being denied an abortion.

«4 With the term ascription, built on the model of description, Hart focuses on a remarkable character of juridical statements: they can be contested, either by denying alleged facts or by invoking circumstances which can weaken, alternate, even annul the claim of a right or the accusation of a crime.

And if in certain circumstances such a right is denied him, this is by no means necessarily an attack on his freedom, even though he may protest.

If homosexuals were allowed to serve in the military and occupy the same quarters, how does a commanding officer respond to the charge that, by allowing homosexuals to room together, he is discriminating against heterosexuals if he denies them as unmarried men and women the similar right of sharing the same quarters?

I can't imagine anyone sitting around thinking to themselves: «Gee, I wonder whether I should choose to be straight, which is considered normal and acceptable; or perhaps choose to be gay, which is roundly condemned by a large percentage of otherwise intelligent people, considered a sin by many churches, was once illegal in most states, will likely result in my being shunned, abused, ridiculed, abandoned, abused, and beaten — possibly killed; will deny me many rights and advantages available to married people; may cost me jobs; and which in general will set me outside of society, marginalized and ostracized.

It is absurd because «there is no right to deny rights to others because there is no right to harm others by immoral dispossession (or injure them in their equal status).»

You're bothered by «good» people being denied entry into heaven just because they don't «believe» in the right God.

Reese responds, «If someone is called to the priesthood by God but denied it by church officials, then it is not a violation of a human right; it is a violation of a divine right — the right of God to call whomever he chooses to the priesthood.»

I'm sorry you are inconvenienced by hearing about the fight for equality, but maybe you should stop complaining and be thankful that you are not the one being denied your rights.

Tho there is a large majority of people who are still afraid of what happened on 911 (and justifiably so) I think that we know deep in our hearts we are denying Muslim Americans the right to worship by denying the mosque at Ground Zero.

When any group attempts to deny or actually denies another group the same rights / privileges granted by the United States Constitution, we are a weaker nation.

By contrast, after the New Jersey Supreme Court denied Gov. Chris Christie's appeal of a judge's overturning of the state's ban on same - sex marriage, an attempt by state lawmakers to later write a bill with religious protections collapsed under pressure from gay - rights groupBy contrast, after the New Jersey Supreme Court denied Gov. Chris Christie's appeal of a judge's overturning of the state's ban on same - sex marriage, an attempt by state lawmakers to later write a bill with religious protections collapsed under pressure from gay - rights groupby state lawmakers to later write a bill with religious protections collapsed under pressure from gay - rights groups.