Sentences with phrase «rights cases about»

Not exact matches

Still, there's an ironic punch line to the case: Because the stolen Bitcoins were sold right away, allegedly by Vinnik and long before Mt. Gox disclosed the hack, victims lost much more, in dollar value, than the hackers ever made — which, according to Chainalysis, was only about $ 20 million.

Organizations should also make sure that they talk about the business case for diversity, rather than simply stating it's the «right» thing to do.

«Ten years ago I would never think it possible for a college to punish a rape victim for talking about her attack,» Colby Bruno, a senior legal counsel at the Victim Rights Law Center, said when briefed on Beth's case.

As Scott Adams, the creator of Dilbert says, «I would argue that in some cases your performance can be enhanced by generating in yourself just the right amount of illusion about your own performance.

Right now, both scholars say the election is too close to call — and in any case, is unlikely to bring about the profound change Indonesia needs.

The case and others like it pending in lower courts raise questions about how much companies protect the privacy rights of their customers.

In many cases, improvement is not about doing more things right, but about doing less things wrong.

In case of any doubt, Wired also learned that, while at Harvard graduate school (right before dropping out to join Google) Damore wrote and performed in a skit about «Microtubule Jerking» and the women who helped with it.

In that case, «You need to think about what the role requires (a broad range of skills, including financial, consultative, planning, interpersonal and influencing skills) and then pick the right person for the role.

July 26, 2017: A discussion with Grace Ezzell and Will King, who will speak about blockchain use cases in land registry and property rights.

So in the worst case of a favorable signal that immediately reverses, we would briefly find ourselves about 84 % hedged rather than 100 % hedged, and would then place those hedges right back on.

He added, «I would ask you to talk to (Manhattan District Attorney) Cy Vance about that — DA Vance — it's his case right now.

(In case you're wondering about the link between charity and human rights, go here).

Whether it's mitigating risk in the purchase process, helping the buyer make the business case for the sale, or working within the buyer's limitations of time and resources — solving a problem is about a whole lot more than finding the right widget.

And although the case has to do with longstanding grievances between Canada and the US, Alden said the timing of it — right as the US is about to kick off a very intense round of NAFTA negotiations — was «highly provocative.»

Hal is here talking about the second case, that of what is called «free banking», and is right to point to George Selgin as a leading scholar in this field (here's a podcast I recorded with George a few years ago)-- his books are a must - read if you are serious about money.

I have an emergency fund and about 10 % of my portfolio sitting in cash for two reasons: I am about to enter the working world and need some extra cash and secondly in case the market suddenly pulls back I want to dive right in so I do not miss out on the gains.

3) The discussion about scaling vs. keeping it small is a very interesting one: I liked that the author presented real - life cases for either scenarios for food for thought instead of advocating one or the other (e.g. presenting a single «formula» as the golden rule that all shall follow)-- I can see how this particular decision can be case sensitive and there really is no «right» answer as long as it works for the entrepreneur!

yo the thing is not about believing or not, is the fact that if we don't believe then we are worthless living garbage who occupy a space in the universe only to create crap and pollution, in that kind of case we would better be recycled into some industrial material for a better use than eating and living like cattle, but if there is a god we acquire a divine status and a purpose to continue to exist beyond afterlife or at least the idea of it, which would give life a sense right?

Driscoll is a textbook case of someone who thinks that his ability to attract a following means that he's right about everything, or at least MORE right than anybody who hasn't been able to attract a following.

Always needing to be right, always needing to be in charge and control, always too busy and self - centered for others and always trying to figure out ways that you can profit from God, the Bible, church and religion tells me who you are, in which case I care not what you think about what the Bible says, whether or not it is without error and so on.

@James Byrd Well, in that case you have about 39 other religions to follow, to make certain you got the right religion, You're going to be a very busy person, following all of those religions.

As one who sat on a jury in a murder case in a state that is not shy about executions, I am aware of how important it is to make sure the right person is convicted.

I am speaking of... what every one must know in his own case: how difficult it is to command himself, and do what he wishes to do; how weak the governing principle of his mind is, and how poorly and imperfectly he comes up to his own notions of right and truth; how difficult it is to command his feelings, grief, anger, impatience, joy, fear; how difficult to govern his own tongue, to say just what he would; how difficult to rouse himself to do what he would, at this time or that; how difficult to rise in the morning; how difficult to go about his duties and not be idle; how difficult to eat and drink just what he should, how difficult to regulate his thoughts through the day; how difficult to keep out of his mind what should be kept out of it.

It can not be the case that the only prescription from which it makes sense to dissent is a prescription about whether one has a right to dissent, because this prescription implies that there is something else one might contest.

Also, the point David was making about rights was that the more conservative denominations enjoy the right to be welcomed and affirmed without question, while this is often not the case with LGBT people.

In this case hell better exist because you are the POOREST rep for a good Christian and have no right EVER pretending to be better than ANYONE when you treat other humans so poorly... not that you really care about the living!

It is, at least, apparent that the debates about humanitarian intervention by military force in the last decade, about the creation of international criminal tribunals in a number of cases, about the idea of a state's «universal jurisdiction» in cases of violations of the Genocide Convention or other «crimes against humanity,» about how far the global war on terror may proceed without violating the rights of states, and most recently, about the United - States - led use of force against the Saddam Hussein regime in Iraq, have all raised important points of positive and customary international law, and that in every one of these cases the outcome remains unsettled.

For readers of this journal, Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission is likely to be the most prominent case, one about the freedom of a Christian baker to decline to design a custom cake for a same - sex wedding celebration.

In the season finale, the justices delivered split opinions in two cases that had not even been fully briefed and argued on the merits — one about President Trump's limits on immigration from six majority - Muslim nations, the other about the right of a female same - sex spouse to be listed as a parent on a birth certificate alongside the birth mother.

A major part of the problem is that though Immanuel Kant wrote about dignity in the 18th century and the word was in use even earlier, strong efforts to elucidate and work with it have not been made (as have been made for, say, the notion of human rights, the subject of innumerable books, essays and court cases).

So where are the human rights they tell us about's when many suffer because of those in this world... it is only for those cases you see people become as good as the «Three Wise Monkeys»...?!

«We all want progress, but if you're on the wrong road, progress means doing an about - turn and walking back to the right road; in that case, the man who turns back soonest is the most progressive.»

So in case what has been expounded here is correct, in case there is no incommensurability in a human life, and what there is of the incommensurable is only such by an accident from which no consequences can be drawn, in so far as existence is regarded in terms of the idea, Hegel is right; but he is not right in talking about faith or in allowing Abraham to be regarded as the father of it; for by the latter he has pronounced judgment both upon Abraham and upon faith.

That is why every few years the Court must reiterate this abortion right as foundational to its legitimacy and to all the cases about privacy decided since Roe....

Yeah Right Ignoring the fact they wanted nothing to do with virgin daughters and preferred the young boys really supports your case that we are not speaking specifically about hom - o $ exuals.

Those who are involved in small groups often claim that these groups have influenced how they think on political and economic issues — for example, raising their interest in questions of peace and social justice or, in the case of conservative religious groups, generating ire about abortion and gay rights.

If it was such a miracle, Tallulah is correct, I think I might have heard about it right now, it would have been written up by medical doctors as an amazing case study and made the rounds and scrutinized.

The document from the Equality and Human Rights Commission follows the European Court of Human Rights judgment in four cases about religious rights in the workplace, one of which found that an employee suffered a breach of her right to religious freedom for being told not to wear a cross atRights Commission follows the European Court of Human Rights judgment in four cases about religious rights in the workplace, one of which found that an employee suffered a breach of her right to religious freedom for being told not to wear a cross atRights judgment in four cases about religious rights in the workplace, one of which found that an employee suffered a breach of her right to religious freedom for being told not to wear a cross atrights in the workplace, one of which found that an employee suffered a breach of her right to religious freedom for being told not to wear a cross at work.

Wow, Bill Deacon, so you are right about one case, if that makes you happy.

I'm a little late getting to this, but I wanted to say a few words about Fernández Martínez v. Spain, the church autonomy case the European Court of Human Rights decided last month.

Upon request, we will grant individuals reasonable access to Personal Information that we hold about them for the purpose of correcting, amending, or deleting such Personal Information where it is inaccurate; provided, however, that we reserve the right to deny access or limit access in cases where the burden or cost of providing access would be disproportionate to the risks to your privacy or in the case of a vexatious or fraudulent request.

Justice Blackmun responded that the case was not about «a fundamental right to engage in homosexual relations,» as the majority opinion pretended.

In case you haven't heard me rant lately on social media, I'm all about using up what's in my fridge and pantry right now.

Also, I hear that the rights of registered partners are about equal to married couples in Sweden, so no need to worry about that in your case: — RRB - My parents are celebrating their 40th anniversary this year, so I'm a little more optimistic about marriage than you are.

In case you have not thought ahead - as I had not - about the overnight prep, I made the spice / herb paste, rubbed it on, and put it all in the slow cooker right away.

The trick of making sheet pan dinner is to find the suitable veggies that take the same amount of time to roast, in my case these veggies were the right ones: in about 30 minutes zucchini, Brussels sprout, thinly sliced carrots and butternut squash are ready to be served.

If we understand your question right, it sounds like you might be wondering about the difference between nutritional protein content (4g, in this case) and baking protein content (12.7 %).

While some vacations are about getting away from it all, Hilton Anaheim's «Center of SoCal» package is about being right at the heart of it all — in this case, having both close proximity and specialized access to the very best entertainment venues Southern California has to offer.

You are SO right, it does start with Halloween and I have just about bought a case of butter.