Sentences with phrase «rights interpretation of»

«We had not the right interpretation of the American law... We didn't lie.

(Note: The Right Interpretation of the Mythological is based upon a lecture delivered at Breslau on 9th January, 1944 by Ernst Lohmeyer.)

The recognition of the kerygmatic character of the gospels, and of the fact that the kerygma was not confined to the historical narratives of the gospels, made the right interpretation of the mythology of the New Testament more urgent than it had ever been before.

But, for the record... I see a tremendous amount of Christians arguing with other «Christians» about what God really means and who's got the right interpretation of which Bible verse.

It reaches further than the question as to the right interpretation of Whitehead itself.

Why is it so terribly important that we shout from the rooftops «only I have the right interpretation of the Bible!

Some scholars would defend the substantial authenticity of many continuous sections of the discourse, e.g. in the «rabbinical» arguments 7:15 - 24, 8:16 - 19, 10:24 - 38, but for the most part the discourses must be considered as artificially built up around genuine words of Jesus, in an attempt to give what the evangelist considered a right interpretation of some aspect of his teaching as a whole.

A child born in an isolated tribal culture without a missionary that doesn't accept the right interpretation of Jesus goes to hell, because according to your book of immorality, we have something written on our «heart» so no one has an excuse.

The Catholic Church possesses the right interpretation of the bible.

Not exact matches

It's just my interpretation of the market, but it seems like there has been a shift in development resources away from smart devices, which is a very crowded space right now, to the types of e-shops where discoverability is less of an issue and we can work together to make games like Shovel Knight and one of my favourites Guacamelee!

Entrepreneurs, after all, must create their own rules and interpretation of what's right and the subsequent supporting environment.

Important factors that may affect the Company's business and operations and that may cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward - looking statements include, but are not limited to, increased competition; the Company's ability to maintain, extend and expand its reputation and brand image; the Company's ability to differentiate its products from other brands; the consolidation of retail customers; the Company's ability to predict, identify and interpret changes in consumer preferences and demand; the Company's ability to drive revenue growth in its key product categories, increase its market share, or add products; an impairment of the carrying value of goodwill or other indefinite - lived intangible assets; volatility in commodity, energy and other input costs; changes in the Company's management team or other key personnel; the Company's inability to realize the anticipated benefits from the Company's cost savings initiatives; changes in relationships with significant customers and suppliers; execution of the Company's international expansion strategy; changes in laws and regulations; legal claims or other regulatory enforcement actions; product recalls or product liability claims; unanticipated business disruptions; failure to successfully integrate the Company; the Company's ability to complete or realize the benefits from potential and completed acquisitions, alliances, divestitures or joint ventures; economic and political conditions in the nations in which the Company operates; the volatility of capital markets; increased pension, labor and people - related expenses; volatility in the market value of all or a portion of the derivatives that the Company uses; exchange rate fluctuations; disruptions in information technology networks and systems; the Company's inability to protect intellectual property rights; impacts of natural events in the locations in which the Company or its customers, suppliers or regulators operate; the Company's indebtedness and ability to pay such indebtedness; the Company's dividend payments on its Series A Preferred Stock; tax law changes or interpretations; pricing actions; and other factors.

Important factors that may affect the Company's business and operations and that may cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward - looking statements include, but are not limited to, operating in a highly competitive industry; changes in the retail landscape or the loss of key retail customers; the Company's ability to maintain, extend and expand its reputation and brand image; the impacts of the Company's international operations; the Company's ability to leverage its brand value; the Company's ability to predict, identify and interpret changes in consumer preferences and demand; the Company's ability to drive revenue growth in its key product categories, increase its market share, or add products; an impairment of the carrying value of goodwill or other indefinite - lived intangible assets; volatility in commodity, energy and other input costs; changes in the Company's management team or other key personnel; the Company's ability to realize the anticipated benefits from its cost savings initiatives; changes in relationships with significant customers and suppliers; the execution of the Company's international expansion strategy; tax law changes or interpretations; legal claims or other regulatory enforcement actions; product recalls or product liability claims; unanticipated business disruptions; the Company's ability to complete or realize the benefits from potential and completed acquisitions, alliances, divestitures or joint ventures; economic and political conditions in the United States and in various other nations in which we operate; the volatility of capital markets; increased pension, labor and people - related expenses; volatility in the market value of all or a portion of the derivatives we use; exchange rate fluctuations; risks associated with information technology and systems, including service interruptions, misappropriation of data or breaches of security; the Company's ability to protect intellectual property rights; impacts of natural events in the locations in which we or the Company's customers, suppliers or regulators operate; the Company's indebtedness and ability to pay such indebtedness; the Company's ownership structure; the impact of future sales of its common stock in the public markets; the Company's ability to continue to pay a regular dividend; changes in laws and regulations; restatements of the Company's consolidated financial statements; and other factors.

Important factors that may affect the Company's business and operations and that may cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward - looking statements include, but are not limited to, increased competition; the Company's ability to maintain, extend and expand its reputation and brand image; the Company's ability to differentiate its products from other brands; the consolidation of retail customers; the Company's ability to predict, identify and interpret changes in consumer preferences and demand; the Company's ability to drive revenue growth in its key product categories, increase its market share or add products; an impairment of the carrying value of goodwill or other indefinite - lived intangible assets; volatility in commodity, energy and other input costs; changes in the Company's management team or other key personnel; the Company's inability to realize the anticipated benefits from the Company's cost savings initiatives; changes in relationships with significant customers and suppliers; execution of the Company's international expansion strategy; changes in laws and regulations; legal claims or other regulatory enforcement actions; product recalls or product liability claims; unanticipated business disruptions; failure to successfully integrate the business and operations of the Company in the expected time frame; the Company's ability to complete or realize the benefits from potential and completed acquisitions, alliances, divestitures or joint ventures; economic and political conditions in the nations in which the Company operates; the volatility of capital markets; increased pension, labor and people - related expenses; volatility in the market value of all or a portion of the derivatives that the Company uses; exchange rate fluctuations; risks associated with information technology and systems, including service interruptions, misappropriation of data or breaches of security; the Company's inability to protect intellectual property rights; impacts of natural events in the locations in which the Company or its customers, suppliers or regulators operate; the Company's indebtedness and ability to pay such indebtedness; tax law changes or interpretations; and other factors.

It would balance the right to bear arms «with an equal respect for the lives of all citizens of Florida» and instruct Florida courts to apply the U.S. Supreme Court's carefully qualified interpretations of the Second Amendment.

For example, I've seen a lot of «man was created in God's image» interpretations to help you think you've validated your position, but I can clear that one up for you right now.

Use the bible for what it was intended, moral stories of how people should act, although current societal norms would certainly preclude stoning and other current justice and civil rights departures from the rigid teachings / interpretations of the bible.

A preamble to an Act can not creates rights and obligation for persons but it can and should be used in the interpretation of the Act, and especially open textured provisions of the Act such as the power of the Minister under s 2 (3)(c) to consider any matter she considers relevant when making an order to require a person to obtain a licence for the export of natural gas, crude oil or refined fuels.

So, for example, Christians, for example, can't even agree amongst themselves about a single interpretation of the bible (oh, that's right, there is more than one bible!).

I'm really amazed at the response of the «Christians» to this, this cant be the right interpretation, so attack the messenger, good thing they weren't around when Jesus showed up!!!!

Does it blow your mind to know that A) other people disagree with your interpretation of biblical scripture and that B) neither of you can ever be objectively right?

I take a literal interpretation of Creation and believe it to be right around 7200 years old.

The Bible and the Quran have always been and will always be open to interpretation, but when people start killing others in that religions name, or start denying others their rights in the name of religion, something is badly wrong.

The law as all of the right wing want to claim is not subject to «judicial interpretation» but to be enforced as written.

And then translated into English with a variety of English - based interpretations, right?

She is right about the Constitution, of course, but not about the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Constitution.

It is worse right now than what is «average» with the worst ebola outbreak in West Africa, people killing each other over their interpretation of the «one true God» in places like the Central African Republic, Nigeria, Syria, Iraq and of course Israel and Gaza, not to mention Vlad and Sergei with their itchy button fingers on SAM launchers in the Ukraine.

And of course, their interpretation of god has to the be the right one.

And «getting it right» requires careful interpretation and sensitivity to the limits of the text.

On the «right» end of the spectrum is the fundamentalism of those who insist that reliable knowledge can only be found in an ultraliteral interpretation of the Bible, and that alternate ways of knowing must be completely subordinated to this way of reading the Bible.

There are two ways to get interpretation of scripture (as you said right and wrong).

Whatever else is said was to challenge the article based on it own interpretations of the bible and how it motivated killers based on a double standard of right and wrong.

When so many people with different versions of God (s) claim a monopoly of truth for their interpretation exclusive of all the others, the logical conclusion is that none of them are right.

Ignoring the origins of the Bible doesn't do service to anyone, except feed the vanity of a bunch of self - important smug, holier - than thou people who want to believe that they are superior to others based solely on them having the «right» Bible and the «right» interpretation of the Bible.

Mason is exactly right in identifying as a key question in a reciprocal Whitehead / Heidegger interpretation the problem whether Whitehead «is a part of the metaphysical tradition which Heidegger seeks to dismantle» (p. 83).

Hence, only the first interpretation is meaningful, and it can not be used to deduce from the existence of (genuine) moral evil the nonexistence of benevolent omnipotence, since «whether the free men created by God would always do what is right would presumably be up to them» (GPE 271).

According to Wright, the Puritan emphasis on the right of individual interpretation of scripture ironically paved the way for eighteenth century rationalism.

The Supreme Court's decision upholding a ban on partialbirth abortions, Gonzales v. Carhart, «is a significant step in the right direction — moving away from the infamous «abortion distortion» in Supreme Court jurisprudence and bringing their interpretation of abortion law more in line with other fields of law».

Oh that's right, YOUR interpretation of YOUR specific version of a book of magicks.

The Pharisees believed there was another source of authority called the oral Torah, the traditional interpretation of the scriptures that had been handed down from generation to generation, right from the time of Moses.

Plus, I am confronted with uncomfortable question of «whose interpretation of Scripture is the right one?»

If the purpose of the legislation of the Sunnah is to expound the legislation of the Qur» an, and if God's policy with His Prophet was to endorse Muhammad's interpretation when it was correct and to guide him to what was right when he made a mistake, then the Sunnah legislation is the same as the legislation of the Qur» an, and equally binding on all Muslims.

Oh kermi, that's cute... maybe the 3 of you can compare notes and argue over who has the right interpretation.

But if we are Christians who take scripture seriously we will recognize that right at this point we have a task of understanding and interpretation.

My concern here is that WTS and other Reformed institutions are elevating Calvin's theological interpretation of God to the point that it is understood to be a comprehensive explanation of God, the only «right» way of thinking about Him and worshipping Him.

The argument is not that all men capable of rationality reach the same conclusions but that those who are willing to be attentive to the right data and open to the correct interpretation can be led to see that certain conclusions follow necessarily.

You far right radical Christians insist that everyone believe and adhere to your personal interpretations of what the bible says.

Somewhat dubious, I searched for the data, which reveals the pro-lifer was right on the facts but offering an unsupported interpretation: The study showed that the maternal mortality rate declined after abortion was prohibited in 1989, but that it had already been declining for more than a decade, probably as a result of rising levels of women's education.

Lincoln, he believes, renewed the theory of statecraft by insisting that «ultimate moral questions did not admit of relativistic interpretations,» while knowing at the same time that the attempt to right moral wrongs may have tragic consequences and almost certainly will not achieve unqualified success.

But we could too easily replace this shallowness by another, cruel as sentimental attitudes inevitably are, which leaves out of account the presence in human life of the sheerly irrevocable, of that which has been done, and it is now too late to undo, of the damage inflicted on others that can not be put right and that no interpretation can possible render edifying.