Sentences with phrase «rights of certain people»

Not exact matches

I've seen in in the home raids and the deportations of innocent family friends and I've seen it in hate crimes, and I've seen it in laws passed by Obama that strip a certain type of people, people that look like me, of our rights in the interest of «national security.»

Stepping back from National Front will give Le Pen more freedom to change certain aspects of her project and to rally support she needs, according to people close to the far - right politician who spoke with Le Monde.

Everything from reaching out to a certain number of coaches every single day, running a specific 40 - yard dash time, eating certain healthy foods that would help increase my performance and attending the right summer camps at universities that would put me in front of the right people.

It is a seamless way of keeping the right people in touch, usually hyper - focused around a certain topic or issue.

Flat and bossless structures work by building, evolving and finessing a working configuration of the right people, process and technologies — relaxing certain traditional controls but making sure to harness that autonomy to useful effect.

Right, as long as you personally can outlive longevity of finite hydrocarbon energies, why bother caring about or planning for what alternative energies our descendents are, with certain, going to need when we've exhausted and / or priced hydrocarbons out most people's reach?

This might be the only time of year that people search certain phrases (like «Christmas office supplies») so targeting them at the right time can put you ahead of the game and in line to make big sales.

Given the fact that prior to the adoption of the decree the appeal cryptocurrency assets in the country is not governed by law, the document stipulates that legal persons have the right to own tokens, and, given the number of features to carry out certain operations.

So if there are certain types of inbound sales inquiries about a certain product line, or inquiries coming from certain sources, we know how to put a consistent process in place so that the inquiry gets routed to the right people at your company.

Provides new commitments from Australia, Chile, Japan, Malaysia and Mexico to extend temporary entry privileges, as well as the right to work for the spouses of certain covered Canadian business persons.

Shareholder — The people or organizations who posses some quantity of equity ownership of a company, usually in the form of stock; depending on the ownership formula, shareholders may be entitled to voting rights, dividend payments, or certain degrees of influence in the company, or bear accountability for its management

Its a sad day when our young black men do nt have the freedom to walk through certain neighborhoods without being harrased are mudered, no one has the right to just take a life just because of the color of your skin we as a people has to stand up to injustices such as this no one wants to hear the truth there is still a racial devide in America and our justice system create laws so that this kind of injustice can continue to happen rather u want to admit it are not our young black men are the prey.

I'm certain that had he lived to see a gay rights movement he would have been marching right alongside them as he did for minorities, the poor and oppressed, because it would have been a civil rights matter for him; a matter of justice for, as he said, ALL of God's people.

@James Byrd Well, in that case you have about 39 other religions to follow, to make certain you got the right religion, You're going to be a very busy person, following all of those religions.

It is written by men that every person is endowed by his or her creator with certain inalienable rights, and that among these is the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

Especially, if belief in Santa was affecting their behavior — like demanding that my kids pray to Santa in the public schools, and that certain people's rights must be curtailed because of their belief in Santa.

Name calling and denial of civil rights, oppression, and manipulation of people seems to be the hallmark of a certain strain of religion.

When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation — We hold these truths to be self - evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

Sometimes there are «right answers, and sometimes certain groups of people in the world achieve those right answers.»

Hypocritical would be preaching love for all but yet denying rights to certain people - a christian thing done constantly all in the name of some god that can't be shown to exist.

While we shouldn't butt into another country's affairs just for the sake of butting in, we should stand up for certain universal rights for all people whether american or whoever.

When the nation was established as a democratic republic, the people of the former English colonies, acting in their various constitutional conventions, transferred all governing power to their states and to the federal government, reserving for themselves only certain rights and powers they previously claimed to enjoy as subjects of the British Crown.

Any country of deceny should always stand up and fight when certain universal rights are being denied no matter who the person is.

If the point of religion is to bring peace and guide a culture toward certain specific behaviors, primarily for order and the preservation of the good qualities of society, then how can one say that one religion is better than another or that a «religion-less» person who STILL acts the SAME way (i.e. does right unto their neighbors, lives according to the thing the bible suggests) but is more tolerant is not as high quality a citizen as another who is associated with a Major League Religious Team?

There are two types of human rights - one is the peoples» rights, the rights of tribal peoples, rights of dalits, of women, the fisherfolk i.e. the rights of peoplehood of certain sections of society; and two, within each people, the rights of each person.

For it is only upon the vision of each person as called to enter into communion with God and others that certain supports and freedoms which allow and enable Man's response accrue to him - i.e. «rights».

Then 14 years after the Declaration of Independence, which proclaimed «all men are created equal and endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights,» the lie was embedded in the U.S. legal structure through the Naturalization Act of 1790, which barred the rights of citizenship from both free and enslaved black people.

The overall evidence weighs heavy towards doing the right thing in a land of brutal oppression of certain people because the Hebrew were holly, set apart for God and redeemed from the bondage of slavery themselves.

The other thought i had on this is that if we follow Jesus he will make us fishers of men we need guidance by the holy spirit to lead us to the right people to share our faith.I can still remember those days of people preaching in the streets I am not certain whether that method was effective.

Although Lincoln is often praised for this remark by those who oppose the mixing of religion and politics, it contains three of the most controversial ideas in American politics: that it is legitimate to invoke the name of God within the realm of political discourse; that God's existence isn't merely symbolic, but that he is always right; and that since God takes sides on certain issues, some people will be divinely justified while others will stand in opposition not only to their political opponents but to the very Creator and Sustainer of the Universe.

And since some people are incapable of knowing right from wrong, and making any choice either way either through age or handicap, the Bible tells us of a special grace that exists over certain individuals should they die.

Why in this world of freedom of expression and freedom of speech that we live in does it seem that certain people's rights seem to outweigh others.

We have looked at these middle period books in their own right to see whether some at any rate of the things he is saying are philosophically suggestive for people who are exploring certain ranges of facts, or looking at them in a new way.

If charismatics are right, they must not condemn any miraculous utterance, prophecy, sign, miracle, answer to prayer, or spiritual experience of any person or religious group as being of the devil, for there is no way to be certain when and where the Holy Spirit is blowing (John 3:8).

We hold these truths to be self - evident; that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; that to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundations on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.

What scholar right from the beginning excludes certain groups of people from criticizing his or her work?

Hey Fishon — You're right again, there are certain instances where I would not use certain words in certain ways because I would be sensitive to other peoples perceptions of those words.

One of the things we are really happy about is that we are one of the largest employers in Fort Bragg right now, giving us certain responsibility to keep people's livelihoods going.»

there is no doubting that Arsene has helped to provide us with some incredible footballing moments in the formative years of his managerial career at Arsenal, but that certainly doesn't and shouldn't mean that he has earned the right to decide when and how he should leave this club... there have been numerous managers at each of the biggest clubs in Europe throughout the last decade who have waged far more successful campaigns than ours yet somehow and someway each were given their walking papers because they failed to meet the standards laid out by the hierarchy of their respective clubs... of course that doesn't mean that clubs should simply follow the lead of others, especially if clubs of note have become too reactionary when it comes to issues of termination, for whatever reasons, but there should be some logical discourse when it comes to the setting of parameters for a changing of the guard... in the case of Arsenal, this sort of discourse was largely stifled when the higher - ups devised their sinister plan on the eve of our move to the Emirates... by giving Wenger a free pass due to supposed financial constraints he, unwittingly or not, set the bar too low... it reminds me of a landlord who says he will only rent to «professional people» to maintain a certain standard then does a complete about face when the market is lean and vacancies are up... for those who rented under the original mandate they of course feel cheated but there is little they can do, except move on, especially if the landlord clearly cares more about profitability than keeping their word... unfortunately for the lifelong fans of a football club it's not so easy to switch allegiances and frankly why should they, in most cases we have been around far longer than them... so how does one deal with such an untenable situation... do you simply shut - up and hope for the best, do you place the best interests of those with only self - serving agendas above the collective and pray that karma eventually catches up with them, do you run away with your tail between your legs and only return when things have ultimately changed, do you keep trying to find silver linings to justify your very existence, do you lower your expectations by convincing yourself it could be worse or do you stand up for what you believe in by holding people accountable for their actions, especially when every fiber of your being tells you that something is rotten in the state of Denmark

only people who never played the game of soccer talk about some one creating chance you created chance for yourself by your positioning ozil actually miss more easy goals scoring opportunity more than anyone else what i understand is when people takes a certain position their sense of Reasoning go right to the door

I know that a lot of Arsenal fans and other people in the football world looking in will blame Arsene Wenger for any and all problems that affect the club, and to a certain extent they are right because the bick does top with the boss and Wenger has more power at Arsenal than most managers are allowed.

I know that people will always trot out that famous old football saying about it being a «nice problem to have» when, like Arsenal right now, a club has a lot of competition for places in a certain area of the pitch.

Just to put in my.02 on this, this is a very difficult problem to have, and I believe that there are no truly right or wrong answers — the right answer is whatever you find that works best for you and your baby, which may be a combination of things; certain ideas may be very wrong for some people and very right for others.

If a child is getting bullied, or a certain group of people's rights are being violated, it's important to speak up.

Especially there are a lot of headlines out there right now blaming parents for certain things and I know it's really easy to do it especially when people aren't doing things the way we've done them in the past.

I'd surrounded myself with exclusively breastfeeding moms but I also found online a little milk supply support group and oh my god it was just like these are my people you know like at that point in time so I think sometimes you know when you do have certain issues it is really nice to be around the people that have the same issues however I mean all of us have issues with breastfeeding so even being around the mommas who were able to just take out their boob and you know nurse right away were I was taking out a supplement nursing system you know.

Progressive parents understand that our children are not merely extensions of us, but are whole people in their own right and who have certain, undeniable rights.

I've had lots of trouble at the beginning with people telling me that I'm not doing it right, that I should be doing things a certain way, or this weird competition that new parents get into when they tell everyone about their new babies.

She also laments a trend on the left and right of shouting down those who hold contrary opinions, and criticises the media for creating a culture whereby only certain groups of people are seen as valid to comment on issues from feminism, Brexit or religion.

Certain professions and companies don't hire cetain kind of people because they are «not right».