If it does, we are taking a step backwards from so many years of hard work to recognize the human
rights of gay people.
The Dems will capitalize on the issue of civil liberties by including
the rights of gay people and listing the ways the Bush administration has happily invaded our privacy since 9/11.
The urban, liberal group values
the rights of gay people to do things more than they value the rights of religious people to not do things.
Addressing an audience of diplomats in Geneva, US Secretary of State Hilary Clinton called for
the rights of gay people to be respected.
If that's what people in that church believe, I respect their freedom to do so — but we should not kid ourselves that the equal
rights of gay people do not need to be regularly restated.
But on the same historic day, several US states passed legislation that restricted
the rights of gay people.
if by «bully» you mean, finance groups to aid and restrict the human
rights of gay people», then yes.
Just like the Christians who have no remorse for blocking the civil
rights of gay people that brings harm to their families, especially during emergencies when they are denied being with their loved ones during death in a hospital and protection for their children.
But I do think that black religious leaders have a responsibility, if they can not support gay marriage, to at least support and fight for the secular
rights of gay people.
Not exact matches
«Extending the
right to religious freedom, clearly designed for an individual
person, to a corporation would have repressive consequences to the American workplace,» says Justin Nelson, president and co-founder
of the National
Gay & Lesbian Chamber
of Commerce.
The company is also very closely tied to
right - wing Republicans, including Rebekah Mercer, co-owner
of Breitbart News — a publication known for regularly publishing what The New York Times calls» «hate news» — a toxic mix
of lies, white - supremacist content, and bullying that can inspire attacks on Muslims,
gay people, women, African Americans, and others.»
«[W] orkplace diversity proposals (which mostly concern
rights for lesbian,
gay, bisexual and transgender
people and those seeking more diversity among corporate board members) account for 9 percent
of the total number
of shareholder resolutions filed so far this year.»
Kenney allies routinely bring up his efforts as immigration minister to bring in
gay people persecuted in Iraq and Iran, but there's no mention
of him expanding or safeguarding LGBTQ
rights for those within Canada.
The fact that I enjoy white privilege does not change the fact that there are
people who would want the
right to fire me or kick me out
of my home simply because I'm
gay.
to President Obama's second inaugural, in which he cast the holy places
of women's
rights, civil
rights, and
gay rights as the postmodern Bethlehem («We, the
people, declare today that the most evident
of truths — that all
of us are created equal — is the star that guides us still; just as it guided our forebears through Seneca Falls, and Selma, and Stonewall»).
I am in favor
of gay rights, it's the word marriage, that I believe
people are having trouble with, not
gays.
im glad no - one believes in demons - the devil or god — and they try to rationalise everything — and discredit the bible — just shows me where we are at in the holy book — see if i remember, the end times come when «scorners and scoffers abound» when — wrong is called
right and
right is called wrong — and
people would be married and given in marriage as in the daysd
of noah --- sodom and gammorah had
gay issues badly - im just gonna laugh and alaugh and laugh when ya «ll burn - do me a favor — at least read the bible once — see what it says before you — go against it.
a tyrannical government taking the rest
of everyone's
rights, (not just
gays or other races
of people).
Fishon, you are probably
right about the numbers
of churches that specifically ban
gay people.
Gay rights campaigner Dan Savage said the idea that churches send out an anti-gay message «totally jibes with my experience and that of millions of other gay and lesbian people.&raq
Gay rights campaigner Dan Savage said the idea that churches send out an anti-
gay message «totally jibes with my experience and that of millions of other gay and lesbian people.&raq
gay message «totally jibes with my experience and that
of millions
of other
gay and lesbian people.&raq
gay and lesbian
people.»
Maybe when Christians stop toting themselves as the moral authority on EVERYTHING and keep their noses out
of peoples personal lives AND stop trying to keep taxpaying American citizens from having
rights (ie
gays)... maybe then they will come into less ridicule.
Perhaps with enough
people hammering the issues
of abortion and
gay marriage, Harris is
right to direct her attention and effort to other issues
of mercy and justice, but the flavor
of the book seems to downplay the importance
of traditional marriage, infant life, and the church's role in mercy ministry.
President Barack Obama has come out in personal support
of same - sex marriage, has encouraged states to recognize the
rights of same - sex couples to marry and even led the movement to abolish Don't Ask, Don't Tell, but he has kept mum on whether or not he believes the Constitution gives
gay people the
right to marry.
It seems to me that the
right - wing
of this country is more focused on fire and brimstone issues that divide us like
gay marriage and abortion just so they can avoid the fact that their primary reason for their economic platform is to feed
people's greed.
People today are so preoccupied with making it illegal to even roll your eye's at the thought
of gay marriage meanwhile over the last 10 years the powers that be have removed some
of the most basic human
rights that even Muslim countries have!
I agree that the cause
of fighting for
gay rights is definitely one worth fighting for, I just don't want
people grabbing and thumping Bibles to do it — conservative, progressive, liberals or New Agers.
I'm certain that had he lived to see a
gay rights movement he would have been marching
right alongside them as he did for minorities, the poor and oppressed, because it would have been a civil
rights matter for him; a matter
of justice for, as he said, ALL
of God's
people.
Look at every over 40 member
of your church and see if any
of them are spending more time ministering or discussing Jesus than they are freaking out about their gun
rights or
gay people or Obama.
Because the majority
of people disagree, or are opposed to
gays having marital
rights, doesn't make it «
right».
Again and again, Charles hammered home the point that it is not necessary to oppose
gay civil
rights on Christian principle; but it is necessary to show love and acceptance, because the church has the responsibility
of welcoming and sharing the good news
of Jesus Christ with all
people.
While glad to see the change
of attitude among conservative Christians with respect to
gay civil
rights and acceptance
of gays as human beings, some
persons were troubled over other aspects
of the issue.
David Thorstad, a spokesman for the h0m0s
rights movement and NAMBLA, clearly states the objectives: «The ultimate goal
of the
gay liberation movement is the achievement
of s freedom for all — not just equal
rights for «lesbians and
gay men, but also freedom
of s expression for young
people and children.»
To deny same gender life - partnerships these
rights because some
people find the thought
of gay marriage icky or offensive is discrimination, pure and simple.
Were religious
people promoting peace when they voted down
gay marriage (a civil
rights issue, opponents
of which will be viewed in the same light as the opponents against civil
rights in the 50s and 60s) You are just so comfortable in the majority, you can't see the prejudice and bias you put on
people that aren't like you.
Furthermore, regardless
of your belief that being
gay is abnormal, denying
people the
rights you enjoy to marry a consenting adult is simply WRONG.
One outcome
of the events surrounding the civil
rights controversy in Bloomington has been a new concern to face the myriad questions relating to homosexuality and religion and to minister to the spiritual needs
of gay persons.
Heroes
of this movement included Germaine Greer and Peter Tatchell, outspoken campaigners for the
rights of women and
gay people.
Corporations are
people and have free speech
rights, so businesses should be able to deny services to
gays because
of their beliefs, but if another corporation doesn't want to enter into a business venture because they found out their future partners are anti-gay bigots that is somehow wrong?
The NAACP's support for marriage equality is deeply rooted in the fourteenth amendment
of the United States constitution and equal protection
of all
people» said NAACP president Benjamin Todd Jealous, a strong backer
of gay rights.
He said that before it happens, he must first suffer many things and be rejected
of this generation That rejection is what you see going on
right now — with the rise
of atheism and
gays and with
people worshipping Lucifer — once that rejection is fully complete, only then shall Jesus come....
Young
people,
gays and non-
gays, have led the
gay rights movement, radically changing how
gays are perceived, protected and accepted within only a couple
of generations.
society needs to stop protecting the
rights of gays and lesbians and should focus on our mere extinction if we do nt repent, and hed to the words
of CHRIST, we should not be spending even a minute talking about
gays, bc the main story is how ignorant and stupid society has become, KNOW THIS, IF YOU REMOVE THE WORDS CHRIST FROM CHRISTMAS AND DECIDE THAT IS NO LONGER A STORY ABOUT A BABY FROM BETHLEHEN AND NOW ITS ABOUT SANTA CLAUS, AND
PEOPLE ARE LEARNING TO ACCEPT OTHER RELIGIONS MOVING TO NY THEN YOU CAN EXPECT EVIL AND DISOBIENCE TO PROVAIL how can any group of people who blantenly marry in a church before GOD ALMIGHTY and demand that society accept them, have any place NEXT TO A HOLY GOD IN HEAVEN, WHO IS WITH OUT SIN, ACCEPT THEI
PEOPLE ARE LEARNING TO ACCEPT OTHER RELIGIONS MOVING TO NY THEN YOU CAN EXPECT EVIL AND DISOBIENCE TO PROVAIL how can any group
of people who blantenly marry in a church before GOD ALMIGHTY and demand that society accept them, have any place NEXT TO A HOLY GOD IN HEAVEN, WHO IS WITH OUT SIN, ACCEPT THEI
people who blantenly marry in a church before GOD ALMIGHTY and demand that society accept them, have any place NEXT TO A HOLY GOD IN HEAVEN, WHO IS WITH OUT SIN, ACCEPT THEIR SIN.
In contrast, last week — in an unprecedented compromise — Utah passed two bills: one banning discrimination against lesbians,
gays, bisexuals, and transgender
people; and on protecting the
rights of those who object to same - sex marriage on religious grounds.
You defenders
of religion keep some interesting company: Osama Bin LLaden, Iraninan Mullahs, Saudi Wahabists (who will cut your head off in public if you preach anything but Islam), Joe Smith who preached that black
people did not have souls (the church changed it mind after the civil
rights act and are now bigotted against
gay people), the Taliban, the pope and his child rapists, ignorant & stupid evangelicals who think that revelations is a roadmap to the future.
Sane
people can disagree about whether there ought to be a
right to privacy, i.e., about whether it is logically a natural
right and if so perhaps ought to be put into the Constitution via amendment, or about whether we (usually at state - level) should pass particular laws, such as ones that legalize
gay - marriage, that factually expand what might be called privacy, but no sane U.S. Citizen,
gay, straight, liberal, or conservative, should be left ignorant about the Constitution - wounding judicial usurpations done in the name
of this
right, more
of which are planned to be done soon enough.
If you don't want Jews, blacks, whites,
gays, Hispanics or any other subset
of people on you property, what
right does the government have to force you?
The reason that there is so much controversy about being
gay whether it is a
right, or a wrong thing to do is that much
of the truth is not being told to
people about YHWH the King.
And,
of course, none
of this as anything to do with
gay people wishing to be married, and being denied the
right to do so.
They (you) are the same
people, writers, and talk show hosts who defend the «
right»
of gays (read: qu ee rs) to adopt little boys.
Gay marriage should be decided by
people, not the courts, because the majority - elected legislatures, not courts, have historically protected the
rights of the minorities.