Sentences with phrase «rights over your children»

As we watch the videos of families crying in Florida we can not comprehend how those voted into power — who hold positions where they are able to create change — continually choose unrestricted gun rights over children's lives.

Consent Form: legal document signed by birth parents that terminates their rights over their child and transfer them to the adoptive parents Criminal Clearance: process used by police or FBI to determine whether the waiting parent has a criminal record.

In general, the parent with primary custodial rights over a child will get to decide what kind of visitation for the other parent is fair and reasonable.

The wife will be losing custody rights over her children.

As a father I have fewer rights over the children than their mother, so she says... — again this is a frequent misconception.

The concept of «men's rights» in marital law stems from the apparent historical preference of family courts to grant mothers custody rights over the children, relegating fathers to holidays and weekends.

Again, a domestic violence charge against your partner can give you more custody rights over your child in the event of a divorce.

But if you have hired a good lawyer, you can be certain to win the case and have the financial rights as well as rights over your children.

There is a current movement calling for shared parenting to give fathers equal rights over their children following a separation or divorce.

A biological father, also known as a birth father, has stronger legal rights over his child than the child's stepdad.

The best relationships I've seen between adoptive parents and adopted kids seems to be when the adoptive parents had nothing at all to do with the parents decision to relinquish or with their loss of rights over their child.

After a guardianship is ordered, the guardian has full custodial rights over the child and required to provide for the child's care, comfort and maintenance.

Custody rights over a child can be either legal custody, physical custody or both.

The court then awards the adoptive parents full legal custodial rights over the child.

If a third party holds custody rights over the child, it is likely the court will inquire as to whether that party wishes to adopt.

But if you have hired a good lawyer, you can be certain to win the case and have the financial rights as well as rights over your children.

Consent form — a legally binding document signed by the birth parents that transfers their parental rights over the child to the adoptive parents

Most parents have general guardianship rights over their children.

Married parents share equal parental rights over a child during the marriage and throughout separation unless a judge issues a court order to the contrary.

Married parents share equal parental rights over their child during a separation, unless a family court issues a child custody order to the contrary.

Not exact matches

Over one - third of respondents (34.98 %) said they would «give up the right to vote in all elections for life» just to secure an extra 10 % in pay, while 9 % said they would «give up their child's or future child's right to vote» for the rest of their lives.

Since his last re-election, Clarke has openly supported Republican causes on local and national right - wing media outlets; proudly trumpets on official Milwaukee County letterhead his 2013 award from the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association, whose leader suggested using women and children as human shields during Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy's standoff with federal agents; accused Milwaukee County Executive Chris Abele of having «penis envy» and being on heroin when crafting the county budget and needing to be drug tested; blasted Milwaukee County District Attorney John Chisholm and Chief Judge Jeffrey Kremers for being «soft on crime»; provided minimal protection for President Obama during his 2012 visit; employs former Scott Walker spokeswoman Fran McLaughlin, who was given criminal immunity over her role in Walker's mixing of campaign and county business; and created pro-gun public service announcements.

Thats Right... The orthodox jews have been wearing Tefilin for over 3000 yrs daily (apart from the sabbath)... and none of them has ever used it as a reason to murder women and children... Why cant you all admit... some of us out there are really losing it...

If I got to watch a school bus full of children roll over in front of their christian parents and burst into flames and roast I would probably jerk off right then and there.

If the grandmother can legally prevent her grandchildren from being born, it means that fathers have no rights of any kind over their pre-born children.

Gay rights groups have expressed outrage over comments made by a senior Vatican official linking homosexuality to child abuse.

The right of parents to exercise control over their children's education has been recognized.

I'm confused it says they will be gossips conceited unholy haters of good without love self love people in the end times to stay away not even to receive them not even pray for them is that blasphemy then it says they hold firm to a godliness but deny its power but I thought blasphemy they don't hold firm to any godliness but are not drawn by the spirit at all to wan na ask forgiveness even it says god is just and will forgive why I wish he would forgive all things his children suffer over that can't change need to also it says if u can say Jesus is lord the holy spirit is with u right or u couldn't even say those words please someone help I've been suffering

A council in east London is going to be quizzed by an advocate for children's rights over its decision to place a Christian girl with Muslim foster carers.

I concluded at the time of the riots that of all the things the government now needed to do, it was the married family which most urgently needed to be rebuilt: I was and remain as certain of that as anything I have ever written, and I have been saying it repeatedly for over 20 years: I was saying it, for instance, when I was attacking (in The Mail and also The Telegraph), as it went through the Commons, the parliamentary bill which became that disastrous piece of (Tory) legislation called the Children Act 1989, which abolished parental rights (substituting for them the much weaker «parental responsibility»), which encouraged parents not to spend too much time with their children, which even, preposterously, gave children the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smackChildren Act 1989, which abolished parental rights (substituting for them the much weaker «parental responsibility»), which encouraged parents not to spend too much time with their children, which even, preposterously, gave children the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smackchildren, which even, preposterously, gave children the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smackchildren the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smack.»

No one seemed concerned about the children in modern divorce, except to argue over parenting responsibilities such as child - support and visitation rights.

I know of a father who, though he had once been convinced parents of LGBT children should «hand them over to Satan» as recommended by John MacAruthur, just marched in his first pride parade right alongside his gay son.

That law firm clearly had cult - like qualities, and she began getting clues that it was when she was told, «The Firm encourages children», even exercising dominion over her reproductive rights.

I care about the life people like you are attempting to force in to this world, you care about what appeases your god - big difference when you really don't care or consider the child only what your imaginary friend god wants and yet your god cause abortions all the time... you care about a clump of cells, not the actual life of the child and that's much worse than me supporting the rights of a woman to have control over her body, especially if the clump of cells couldn't survive outside of the host.

At the very least, we must ensure the civil rights of children who may someday come into the world through cloning, by insisting that no child can be owned, bought, sold, or manipulated, that no government agency or group can sponsor the cloning of a child over which it will have guardianship (i.e., children will be cloned only in circumstances where they will be reared by a family), and that no child can be cloned solely for the purpose of procuring organs or for monetary gain.

Its funny that you want to take my right as a human to defend myself with as much firepower as possible but you do nt want to «trample» the rights of women by not allowing them to have abortions which kill over a million children per year.

London, England (CNN)- Pope Benedict XVI arrives in Britain this week amid criticism over the landmark visit's cost to taxpayers and anger over the Vatican's record on child abuse and human rights.

In the negotiations over the 1989 Convention on the Rights of the Child, now accepted by virtually every nation except the U.S., the minimum age at which the fetus becomes a child was hotly dispChild, now accepted by virtually every nation except the U.S., the minimum age at which the fetus becomes a child was hotly dispchild was hotly disputed.

Psychosis / most psychiatric illnesses often arise in adolescence or in early adult life however 75 per cent of children with mental health disorders / issues do not get the help they need — I fell into that 75 per cent, I was misdiagnosed by a doctor and then the self - induced trance - like altered state of consciousness induced by intense / deep meditation and prayer coupled with the theology about how prayer and God work in a Christian's life (more on this below) just pushed me right over the edge.

The court was asked to order Campus Crusade to turn over any revenue earned by the children's video, to award damages and, finally, to restore all film rights to the Genesis Project.

I very nearly gave up early in that 2005 series though — I think it was the farting aliens on Downing Street that made me roll my eyes so hard they nearly fell out of my head — but right around the eighth and ninth episodes (called The Empty Child and The Doctor Dances, a perfect mix of love and fear, creepiness and beauty) was when I fell head over heels in love with the show.

If his second marriage were invalid, the children of that marriage would be illegitimate; the claim of illegitimacy would challenge their right to the throne and threaten civil war over the succession.

A necessary consideration is that in Canon Law it is parents who are given all the rights over the education of children and not the state, not even bishops whose role is the very limited one of providing Catholic schools where they do not exist and inspecting and regulating them.

Over the rights and wishes from the majority of the population.and you still cant marry your sister, your brother or your ped abused child but that may change also.

It's not right that 30,000 children die every day due to poverty or that in Boston, where I live, there are over 6,000 homeless men, women and children.

How long will the Christians and people of the United States have to contemplate the incongruity of its government... as it supports with over a million dollars a day another government that represses, kills bishops, religious workers, children, men and women, violates human rights, closes itself to dialogue and obstructs the pastoral task of the churches?

Needs a repost — I had neighbors right next door that would do ritual beatings of their children, 2,4,6 years old every Sunday, I called the police serveral times over the screams from those poor young children and the cops said they could not do anything about it.

You DO know that Ramses II had over 100 children, right?

This child will be the one who has to grow up with the name, deal with being picked on in school over the name, for the name showing up on resumes, and being judged by that resume before even getting an interview, etc.... A parent should have the right to name their child, but to a limit.

Organized religion is the root of most evils today: Abuse of children and women, wars over religious territories, terrorists with radical religious beliefs, denial of a women's right to choose, denial of gay rights, oppression of differing cultures, corruption in churches, synagogues, mosques, etc..